Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:44:07.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The intervention taboo(s): Strategy and normative invalidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2017

Michelle Bentley
Michelle Bentley*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London
*
*Correspondence to: Dr Michelle Bentley, Department of Politics and International Relations, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, TW20 0EX. Author’s email: Michelle.Bentley@rhul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intervention comprises one of the most contentious issues in International Relations. This controversy results from the way normative understanding is structured around two key, but mutually exclusive, taboos: the moral expectation to respond in cases of humanitarian need and the protection of state sovereignty. In examining this dilemma, this article asks: what happens to the construction of rhetorical strategy, where that strategy seeks to justify intervention (or not), within a binary normative environment? It is argued that actors can only successfully construct a rhetorical case by engaging in, what is termed here, normative invalidation. In a binary situation, actors cannot adhere to both taboos. These taboos are so compelling, however, that actors must necessarily invalidate or neutralise any taboo not adhered to. This is discussed in relation to the Strategic Narratives paradigm and comparative case studies on the presidential rhetoric of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

Keywords

Normative TheoryStrategic NarrativesInterventionUS Foreign Policy
Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 557 - 580
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Morgenthau, Hans J., ‘To intervene or not to intervene’, Foreign Affairs, 45:3 (1967), p. 425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 ‘Rhetorical strategy’ is defined here as the narrative(s) employed by an actor to create a specific view of the decision for (non-)intervention. It is the rhetorical presentation of a policy to be audience in order to convince them to support the case put forward.

3 Webster, Hutton, Taboo: A Sociological Study (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1942), pp. 13 Google Scholar, 17.

4 Walter Gantz, ‘The Movement of Taboos: A Message-Orientated Approach’, Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, Seattle, Washington, 13–16 August 1978; Allan, Kate and Burridge, Keith, Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Tannenwald, Nina, The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Quester, George, ‘If the nuclear taboo gets broken’, Naval War College Review, 58:2 (2005), p. 74 Google Scholar; Price, Richard, ‘International norms and the mines taboo: Pulls towards compliance’, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 5:3 (1998), p. 115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Bjorkdahl, Annika, ‘Norms in International Relations: Some conceptual and methodological reflections’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15:1 (2002), p. 13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Katzenstein, Peter, ‘Introduction: Alternative perspectives on national security’, in Peter Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 5 Google Scholar. The concept of ‘proper’ behaviour is also employed by Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52:4 (1998), p. 891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Tannenwald, The Nuclear Taboo, p. 10.

9 Goertz, Gary and Diehl, Paul F., ‘Towards a theory of international norms: Some conceptual and measurement issues’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36:4 (2012), pp. 634–664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Sluka, Jeffrey, ‘Terrorism and taboo: an anthropological perspective on political violence against citizens’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1:2 (2008), pp. 167–183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Stein, Janice Gross, ‘Taboos and regional security regimes’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 26:3 (2010), pp. 6–81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Frankenberg, Gunter, ‘Torture and taboo: an essay comparing paradigms of comparative law’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 56:2 (2008), pp. 403–422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Price, Richard, ‘A genealogy of the chemical weapons taboo’, International Organization, 49:1 (1995), pp. 73–103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Heinze, Eric A., ‘Humanitarian intervention: Morality and international law on intolerable violations of human rights’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 8:4 (2004), p. 471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Pickering, Jeffrey and Kisangani, Emizet F., ‘The international military intervention debate: an updated resource for conflict scholars’, Journal of Peace Research, 46:4 (2009), p. 589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Wheeler, Nicholas, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Bellamy, Alex. J., ‘Kosovo and the advent of sovereignty as responsibility’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3:2 (2009), pp. 163–184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mulaj, Kledja, ‘Dilemmas of reacting to mass atrocities: Humanitarian intervention to end violent conflict in the western Balkans’, Democracy and Security, 7:2 (2011), p. 141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Pasic, Amir and Weiss, Thomas G., ‘The politics of rescue: Yugoslavia’s wars and the humanitarian impulse’, Ethics and International Affairs, 11:1 (1997), pp. 105–131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 To the extent that any suffering can be considered legitimate.

19 Annan, Kofi, ‘Intervention’, Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 15:2 (1999), p. 116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Hehir, Aidan, ‘The responsibility to protect in international political discourse: Encouraging statement of intent or illusory platitudes?’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 15:8 (2011), p. 1332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Fiott, Daniel, ‘Realist thought and humanitarian intervention’, The International History Review, 35:4 (2013), p. 767 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Adams, Major Mark, ‘A duty to intervene?’, The RUSI Journal, 145:6 (2000), pp. 32–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Weiss, Thomas G., ‘The sunset of humanitarian intervention? The responsibility to protect in a unipolar era’, Security Dialogue, 35:2 (2004), p. 141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Noam Chomsky, ‘The current bombings: Behind the rhetoric’, Z-Net (2009), available at: {https://chomsky.info/199903__/}; Stanlake J. T. M. Samkange, ‘African perspectives on intervention and state sovereignty’, African Security Review, 11:1 (2002), pp. 73–4.

25 MacFarlane, S. Neil, Thielking, Carolin J., and Weiss, Thomas G., ‘The responsibility to protect? Is anyone interested in humanitarian intervention?’, Third World Quarterly, 25:5 (2004), p. 977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kurth, James, ‘Humanitarian intervention after Iraq: Legal ideals vs. military realities’, Orbis, 50:1 (2006), pp. 87–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cottey, Andrew, ‘Beyond humanitarian intervention: the new politics of peacekeeping and intervention’, Contemporary Politics, 14:4 (2008), p. 429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Adebajo, Adekeye, ‘The revolt against the West: Intervention and sovereignty’, Third World Quarterly, 37:7 (2016), pp. 1187–1202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Weiss, ‘The responsibility to protect?’, p. 135.

28 Menon, Rajan, ‘Pious words, puny deeds: the “international community” and mass atrocities’, Ethics and International Affairs, 23:3 (2009), p. 237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Bellamy, Alex J., ‘Motives, outcomes, intent and the legitimacy of humanitarian intervention’, Journal of Military Ethics, 3:3 (2004), pp. 216–232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Glanville, Luke, ‘Norms, interests and humanitarian intervention’, Global Change, Peace and Security, 18:3 (2006), p. 155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Price, ‘International norms and the mines taboo’, p. 105.

32 Ibid., pp. 116–17.

33 Among others: Pease, Kelly Kate and Forsythe, David P., ‘Human Rights, humanitarian intervention, and world politics’, Human Rights Quarterly, 15:2 (1996), pp. 290–314 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Charvet, John, ‘The idea of state sovereignty and the right of humanitarian intervention’, International Political Science Review, 18:1 (1997), pp. 39–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ayoob, M., ‘Humanitarian intervention and state sovereignty’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 6:1 (2002), pp. 81–102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anderson, Andreas, ‘Democracy and susceptibility to UN intervention’, International Peacekeeping, 13:2 (2006), pp. 185–186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Enabulele, A. O., ‘Humanitarian intervention and territorial sovereignty: the dilemma of two strange bedfellows’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 14:3 (2010), pp. 407–424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heraclides, Alexis, ‘Humanitarian intervention in the 19th century: the heyday of a controversial concept’, Global Society, 26:2 (2012), p. 216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Steinberg, Michael, ‘Reforming the notion of national sovereignty by external intervention’, Defense & Security Analysis, 29:1 (2013), pp. 68–75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Sorensen, Georg, ‘Sovereignty: Change and continuity in a fundamental institution’, Political Studies, 47:3 (1999), pp. 590–604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Jackson, Robert, ‘Sovereignty in world politics: a glance at the conceptual and historical landscape’, Political Studies, 47:3 (1999), pp. 431–456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tannam, Etain, ‘International intervention in ethnic conflict: Competing approaches’, Ethnopolitics, 11:4 (2012), p. 342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brockmeier, Sarah, Kurtz, Gerrit, and Junk, Julian, ‘Emerging norm and rhetorical tools: Europe and a responsibility to protect’, Conflict, Security & Development, 14:4 (2014), pp. 429–460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Weber, Cynthia, Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leonard, Eric K., ‘Seeking sovereignty: Gaining understanding through critical analysis’, New Political Science, 23:3 (2001), pp. 407–428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kurtulus, Ersun, ‘Theories of sovereignty: an interdisciplinary approach’, Global Society, 18:4 (2004), pp. 347–371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 United Nations, Charter of the United Nations (1945), available at: {www.un.org/en/charter-united-nations/}.

38 Peter, Mateja, ‘The politics of self-defence: Beyond a legal understanding of international norms’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24:2 (2011), p. 245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 UN, Charter of the United Nations.

40 Knox, Robert, ‘Civilizing interventions? Race, war and international law’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26:1 (2013), p. 114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Martin, Stevie, ‘Sovereignty and the responsibility to protect’, Griffith Law Review, 20:1 (2011), p. 153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 UN, Charter of the United Nations; Hurd, Ian, ‘Is humanitarian intervention legal? The rule of law in an incoherent world’, Ethics and International Affairs, 25:3 (2011), p. 303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Panke, Diana and Petersohn, Ulrich, ‘Why international norms disappear sometimes’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:4 (2012), p. 733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Rothe, Dawn L. and Mullins, Christopher W., ‘The death of state sovereignty? An empirical exploration’, International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 34:1 (2010), pp. 79–96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Matiya, Jarvis, ‘Can there be a human rights approach to international intervention?’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 39:1 (2013), p. 107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Brockmeier, Sarah, Stuenkel, Oliver, and Tourinho, Marcos, ‘The impact of the Libya intervention debates on norms of protection’, Global Society, 30:1 (2016), pp. 113–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Hayman, P. A. and Williams, John, ‘Westphalian sovereignty: Rights, intervention, meaning and context’, Global Society, 20:4 (2006), pp. 521–541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Shain, Selver B., ‘How exception became the norm: Normalizing intervention as an exercise in risk management in Kosovo’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 15:1 (2013), pp. 17–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47 Szende, Jennifer, ‘Selective humanitarian intervention: Moral reason and collective agents’, Journal of Global Ethics, 8:1 (2012), pp. 64–65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Bellamy, ‘Kosovo and the advent of sovereignty as responsibility’; Thakur, Ramesh, ‘Intervention, sovereignty and the responsibility to protect: Experiences from ICSS’, Security Dialogue, 33:3 (2002), pp. 323–340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Etzioni, Amitai, ‘Sovereignty as responsibility’, Orbis, 50:1 (2006), pp. 71–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glanville, Luke, ‘The antecedents of “sovereignty as responsibility”’, European Journal of International Relations, 17:2 (2010), pp. 233–255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Tanguy, Joelle, ‘Redefining sovereignty and intervention’, Ethics and International Affairs, 17:1 (2003), pp. 141–148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chandler, David, ‘Reconceptualizing international intervention: Statebuilding, “organic processes” and the limits of casual knowledge’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9:1 (2015), p. 74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Cilliers, Jakkie and Sturman, Kathryn, ‘The right intervention’, African Security Review, 11:3 (2002), p. 28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Legro, Jeffrey W., ‘Which norms matter? Revisiting the “failure” of internationalism’, International Organization, 51:1 (1997), pp. 31–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Axelrod, Robert, ‘An evolutionary approach to norms’, American Political Science Review, 80:4 (1986), pp. 1095–1111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Bentley, Michelle, Syria and the Chemical Weapons Taboo: Exploiting the Forbidden (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016)Google Scholar.

54 Weiner, Myron, ‘The clash of norms: Dilemmas in refugee policies’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 11:4 (1998), pp. 433–453 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shannon, Vaughn P., ‘Norms are what states make of them: the political psychology of norm violation’, International Studies Quarterly, 44:2 (2000), pp. 293–316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Cohen, Marshall, ‘Moral skepticism and international relations’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13:4 (1984), pp. 299–346 Google Scholar; Dixon, Paul, ‘“There is nothing politically right that is morally wrong”? Beyond realism and idealism in the Northern Ireland peace process’, Irish Political Studies, 29:2 (2004), pp. 236–257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jannika Brostrom, ‘Morality and the national interest: Towards a “moral realist” research agenda’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs (2015), available at: {www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09557571.2015.1015488}.

57 In discussing this normative situation, this is not to suggest that it will always remain so. Norms come and go, as to their relationships with other norms; nor are they essentialist in my interpretation. The identified dilemma, therefore, is limited to its history and present use. It may be that one, or both, taboos will disappear and actors will be either free or subject to other/new considerations in terms of their construction of rhetorical strategy. Yet the conclusions surrounding how actors deal with normative dilemma in respect to rhetorical strategy still hold. And unless either taboo is effectively removed from current understanding (for whatever reason), both will continue to exert a major influence over how an actor communicates a decision of intervention and will shape the nature of the rhetorical strategy employed in doing so.

58 Doty, Roxanne, Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Milliken, Jennifer, ‘The study of discourse in International Relations: a critique of research and methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:2 (1999), pp. 225–254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hansen, Lene, Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar; Epstein, Charlotte, The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Epstein, Charlotte, ‘Theorizing agency in Hobbes’ wake: the rational actor, the self, or the speaking subject?’, International Organization, 67:2 (2013), pp. 287–316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Krebs, Ron R., Narrative and the Making of US National Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Krebs, Ron R. and Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, ‘Twisting tongues and twisting arms: the power of political rhetoric’, European Journal of International Relations, 13:1 (2007), pp. 35–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 See, for example, Finnemore and Sikkink, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, pp. 887–917.

61 De Graaf, Beatrice, Dimitriu, George, and Ringsmose, Jens, ‘Shaping societies for war: Strategic narratives and public opinion’, in Beatrice De Graaf, George Dimitriu and Jens Ringsmose (eds), Strategic Narratives, Public Opinion, and War (London: Routledge, 2015), pp. 3–14 Google Scholar; Krebs, Narrative and the Making of US National Security.

62 Miskimmon, Alister, O’Loughlin, Ben, and Roselle, Laura, Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order (New York: Routledge, 2013), p. 2 Google Scholar.

63 Freedman, Lawrence, ‘The transformation of strategic affairs’, The Adelphi Papers, 45:379 (2006), p. 22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Hajer, Maarten, The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford: Clarendon, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tuathail, Gearóid Ó, ‘Theorizing practical geopolitical reasoning: the case of the United States: Response to the war in Bosnia’, Political Geography, 21:5 (2002), pp. 601–628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dimitriu, George R., ‘Winning the story war: Strategic communication and the conflict in Afghanistan’, Public Relations Review, 38:2 (2011), pp. 195–207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Arquilla, John and Rondfelt, David, ‘What next for networks and netwars’, in John Arquilla and David Rondfelt (eds), Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime and Militancy (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001), p. 328 Google Scholar.

65 Miskimmon et al., Strategic Narratives, p. 3.

66 Norheim-Martinsen, Per M., ‘EU strategic culture: When the means becomes the end’, Contemporary Security Policy, 32:3 (2011), p. 521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Bentley, Michelle, Weapons of Mass Destruction and US Foreign Policy: The Strategic Use of a Concept (London: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar.

68 Skinner, Quentin, ‘Some problems in the analysis of political thought and action’, Political Theory, 2:3 (1974), p. 293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Quentin Skinner: ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory, 8:1 (1969), p. 49; ‘Conventions and the understanding of speech acts’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 20:79 (1970), pp. 118–38; ‘Hermeneutics and the role of history’, New Literary History, 7:1 (1975), p. 216; ‘Introduction: Seeing things their way’, in Quentin Skinner (ed.), Visions of Politics: Volume 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 7.

70 Bentley, Syria and the Chemical Weapons Taboo.

71 Kroslak, Daniela, The Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide (London: C. Hurst & Co., 2007)Google Scholar; Wallis, Andrew, Silent Accomplice: The Untold Story of France’s Role in the Rwandan Genocide (London: I. B. Tauris & Co., 2014)Google Scholar.

72 Clinton engrained his post-Somalia aversion to peacekeeping in May 1994, signing into force ‘Presidential Decision Directive 25: The Clinton Administration’s Policy on Reforming Multilateral Peace Operations’ (although this only limited, and did not explicitly rule out, US engagement in peacekeeping). For discussion, see: Burkhalter, Holly L., ‘The question of genocide: the Clinton administration and Rwanda’, World Policy Journal, 11:4 (1994/1995), pp. 48–49 Google Scholar; Ware, Glenn T., ‘The emerging norm of humanitarian intervention and Presidential Decision Directive 25’, Naval Law Review, 44 (1997), pp. 1–58 Google Scholar; Schraeder, Peter J., ‘Trends and transformations in the Clinton administration’s foreign policy toward Africa (1993–1999)’, Issue: A Journal of Opinion, 26:2 (1998), pp. 2–3 Google Scholar; Lock-Pullan, Richard, ‘Learning the limits of virtue: Clinton, the army and the criteria for the use of military force’, Contemporary Security Policy, 24:2 (2003), pp. 144–146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 Power, Samantha, The Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide (London: Harper Perennial, 2003), p. 335 Google Scholar.

74 Melvern, Linda, A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda’s Genocide (London: Zed Books, 2000)Google Scholar; Melvern, Linda, Conspiracy to Murder: The Rwandan Genocide (London: Verso, 2004)Google Scholar. See also Dallaire, Romeo, Shake Hands with the Devil: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda (New York: Carroll and Graf, 2004)Google Scholar.

75 Lyn Graybill, ‘“Responsible … by Omission”: The United States and genocide in Rwanda’, Seton Hall Journal of Diplomatic and International Relations, winter/spring (2002), pp. 88–9.

76 Douglas Jehl, ‘Officials told to avoid calling Rwanda killings “genocide”’, New York Times (10 June 1994), available at: {www.nytimes.com/1994/06/10/world/officials-told-to-avoid-calling-rwanda-killings-genocide.html}; Burkhalter, ‘The question of genocide’, p. 45; Philip Gourevitch, We Wish to Inform You that Tomorrow We Will be Killed with our Families: Stories from Rwanda (London: Picador, 1998), p. 132.

77 Adam Jones, Crimes Against Humanity (Oxford: Oneworld Publication, 2008), p. 26.

78 Power, The Problem From Hell, p. 384.

79 William Clinton, ‘Radio Address on the Situation in Rwanda’, Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States (hereafter PPPUS), Book 1 (1994), p. 807.

80 Alain Destexhe, Rwanda and Genocide in the Twentieth Century (London: Pluto, 1994), p. 33; David Durenberger, ‘The international community’s failure in Rwanda’, Congressional Record – Senate (8 June 1994), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1994-06-08/html/CREC-1994-06-08-pt1-PgS51.htm}.

81 Clinton, William, ‘Remarks on Legislation to Ban Assault Weapons’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1994), p. 814 Google Scholar. See also William Clinton, ‘Remarks at the Gallaudet University Commencement Ceremony’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1994), p. 906.

82 Harrow, Kenneth W., ‘“Ancient tribal warfare”: Foundational fantasies of ethnicity and history’, Research in African Literatures, 36:2 (2005), pp. 34–45 Google Scholar. See also Newbury, Catharine and Newbury, David, ‘A Catholic mass in Kigali: Contested views of the genocide and ethnicity in Rwanda’, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 33:2–3 (1999), p. 293 Google ScholarPubMed; Fein, Helen, ‘Civil wars and genocide: Paths and circles’, Human Rights Review, 1:3 (2000), p. 57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 Chari, Tendai, ‘Representation or misrepresentation? The New York Times’s framing of the 1994 Rwandan genocide’, African Identities, 8:4 (2010), pp. 333–349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Clinton, William, ‘Remarks to the White House Conference on Africa’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1994), p. 1150 Google Scholar; Clinton, William, ‘Interview with the French Media in Paris’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1994), pp. 1056–1057 Google Scholar.

85 Clinton, William, ‘Remarks Announcing Assistance to Rwandan Refugees and an Exchange with Reporters’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1994), pp. 1298 Google Scholar, 1299.

86 Clinton, William, ‘Exchange with Reporters in Hot Springs’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1994), p. 1305 Google Scholar.

87 William Clinton, ‘Proclamation 6747 – United Nations Day, 1994’, Compilation of Presidential Documents (hereafter CPD) (1994), p. 2095.

88 Dunne, Tim and Kroslak, Daniela, ‘Genocide: Knowing what it is that we want to remember, or forget, or forgive’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 4:3–4 (2000), pp. 37–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 Bellamy, ‘Kosovo and the advent of sovereignty as responsibility’.

90 Clinton, ‘Remarks to the Arab American Institute Conference’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1998), pp. 718–19; Clinton, ‘Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Dinner in Aspen, Colorado’, PPPUS, Book 2 (1998), p. 1329.

91 Clinton, ‘Remarks on Departure for Europe and an Exchange with Reporters’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 686.

92 Clinton, ‘Remarks and a Question-and-Answer Session with the American Society of Newspaper Editors in San Francisco, California’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 553.

93 Clinton, ‘Statement on the Observance of Orthodox Easter’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 536.

94 Clinton, ‘Remarks to the Arkansas State Democratic Committee in Little Rock, Arkansas’, PPPUS, Book 2 (1998), p. 1271; Clinton, ‘Remarks at a Reception for Lieutenant Governor Gray Davis of California in Los Angeles’, PPPUS, Book 2 (1998), p. 1438.

95 Clinton, ‘Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Dinner in Las Vegas’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 799.

96 Clinton, ‘Remarks Prior to Discussions with United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan and an Exchange with Reporters’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1998), p. 355; Clinton, ‘Remarks at a Democratic National Committee Dinner in Philadelphia’, PPPUS, Book 2 (1998), p. 1734; Clinton, ‘Remarks to Kosovo International Security Force Troops in Skopje’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 993.

97 Clinton, ‘Address to the Nation on Airstrikes Against Serbian Targets in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 451.

98 Clinton, ‘Remarks at the Legislative Convention of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 429.

99 Falk, Richard A., ‘Kosovo, world order, and the future of international law’, The American Journal of International Law, 93:4 (1999), pp. 847–857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mandelbaum, Michael, ‘A perfect failure: NATO’s war against Yugoslavia’, Foreign Affairs, 78:5 (1999), pp. 2–8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For criticism of the criticism, see Steinberg, James B., ‘A perfect polemic: Blind to reality in Kosovo’, Foreign Affairs, 78:6 (1999), pp. 128–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 Henkin, Louis, ‘Kosovo and the law of humanitarian intervention’, The American Journal of International Law, 93:4 (1999), pp. 824–828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Merriam, John J., ‘Kosovo and the law of humanitarian intervention’, Case Western Journal of International Law, 33:1 (2001), pp. 111–154 Google Scholar; Cohen, Marjorie, ‘NATO bombing of Kosovo: Humanitarian intervention or crime against humanity’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 15:1 (2002), pp. 79–2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

101 William Clinton, ‘Remarks Following a Meeting with a Congressional Delegation and an Exchange with Reporters’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 653.

102 Clinton, ‘American Society of Newspaper Editors’, p. 551.

103 William Clinton, ‘Remarks to the Community at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 689.

104 William Clinton, ‘Remarks for Following Discussions with NATO Secretary General Javier Solana and an Exchange with Reporters’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 601.

105 Greenhill, Kelly, ‘Counting the cost: the politics of numbers in armed conflict’, in Peter Andreas and Kelly Greenhill (eds), Sex, Drugs, and Body Counts: The Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Conflict (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010), pp. 149–154 Google Scholar.

106 William Clinton, ‘Remarks on the Situation in the Balkans and an Exchange With Reporters’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), pp. 499–500; William Clinton, ‘Interview with Dan Rather of CBS News’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 475.

107 William Clinton, ‘Remarks on Senate Action on Gun Control Legislation and an Exchange With Reporters’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 756.

108 William Clinton, ‘Statement on the Situation in Kosovo’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 57.

109 William Clinton, ‘The President’s News Conference’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), pp. 409–10.

110 William Clinton, ‘The President’s News Conference with Premier Zhu Rongji of China’, PPPUS, Book 1 (1999), p. 521.

111 Holland, Jack, ‘Obama as modern Jeffersonian’, in Michelle Bentley and Jack Holland (eds), The Obama Doctrine: A Legacy of Continuity in US Foreign Policy (Routledge: London, 2016)Google Scholar.

112 Barack Obama, ‘Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the State of the Union’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400050/pdf/DCPD-201400050.pdf}.

113 Barack Obama, ‘Remarks Prior to a Meeting with President Toomas H. Ilves of Estonia’, CPD (2013), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201300583/pdf/DCPD-201300583.pdf}.

114 Barack Obama, ‘Address to the Nation on the Situation on Syria: September 10, 2013’, CPD (2013), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201300615/pdf/DCPD-201300615.pdf}.

115 Barack Obama, ‘The President’s Weekly Address: September 13’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400662/pdf/DCPD-201400662.pdf}.

116 Barack Obama, ‘Remarks on the Situation in Iraq and an Exchange With Reporters: August 9’, CPD (2014), {available at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400606/pdf/DCPD-201400606.pdf}.

117 Barack Obama, ‘Remarks With Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India in New Delhi, India and an Exchange With Reporters: January 25’, CPD (2015), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201500051/pdf/DCPD-201500051.pdf}.

118 Barack Obama, ‘Remarks on the Situation in Iraq and an Exchange With Reporters: June 13’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400454/pdf/DCPD-201400454.pdf}. See also Barack Obama, ‘Remarks on the Situation in Iraq: August 7’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400602/pdf/DCPD-201400602.pdf}; Barack Obama, ‘Address to the Nation on United States Strategy to Combat the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant Terrorist Organization (ISIL): September 10’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400654/pdf/DCPD-201400654.pdf}; Barack Obama, ‘Remarks on the Situation in Iraq and an Exchange With Reporters: June 19’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400470/pdf/DCPD-201400470.pdf}.

119 Alkopher, Tal Dingott, ‘From Kosovo to Syria: the transformation of NATO Secretaries General’s discourse on military humanitarian intervention’, European Security, 25:1 (2016), pp. 49–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

120 Widmaier, Wesley W. and Glanville, Luke, ‘The benefits of norm ambiguity: Constructing the wider responsibility to protect across Rwanda, Iraq and Libya’, Contemporary Politics, 21:4 (2015), p. 376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

121 Obama, ‘Remarks: June 13’.

122 Obama, ‘Weekly Address: September 13’.

123 Barack Obama, ‘Remarks at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida: September 17’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400669/pdf/DCPD-201400669.pdf}.

124 Obama, ‘Remarks: June 19’.

125 Obama, ‘Remarks: August 9’.

126 Barack Obama, ‘Remarks at the American Legion National Conventional in Charlotte, North Carolina: August 26’, CPD (2014), available at: {www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201400621/pdf/DCPD-201400621.pdf}.