Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:27:50.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Where are the aircraft carriers?’* –nonverbal communication in international politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Raymond Cohen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The subject of nonverbal communication, or signalling, as it is usually called, between states, has received some attention in the literature in the past, usually within the context of conflict or crisis studies. John W. Burton argues that ‘military smoke signals’ are used by parties to conflict when direct communication is ruled out. James Cable, in a study of gunboat diplomacy, suggests that displays of naval power can perform the ‘expressive function’ of emphasizing attitudes, lending verisimilitude to otherwise unconvincing statements or providing an outlet for emotion. Specific examples of nonverbal signalling are common: among others Charles McClelland describes its use in the Berlin and Quemoy crises; Coral Bell shows how the superpowers have developed the mechanism to a fine degree of sophistication.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 79 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Burton, J. W., Conflict and Communication (London, 1969), p. 54.Google Scholar

2. Cable, J., Gunboat Diplomacy (New York, 1971), p. 63.Google Scholar

3. McClelland, C. A., ‘Action Structures and Communication in Two International Crises: Quemoy and Berlin’, International Politics and Foreign Policy, Rosenau, J. N. (ed.), revised edition (New York, 1969), pp. 473–482.Google Scholar

4. Bell, C., The Conventions of Crisis (London, 1970)Google Scholar. See also Bell, C., ‘The October Middle East War; A Case Study in Crisis Management During Detente’, International Affairs, 1 (1974), pp. 535–538.Google Scholar

5. Jervis, R., The Logic of Images in International Relations (Princeton, 1970), pp. 18–40.Google Scholar

6. Goffman, E., Strategic Interaction (Oxford, 1970).Google Scholar

7. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V., ‘The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior; Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding’, Semiotica, i (1969), p. 75.Google Scholar

8. Ibid. p. 60.

9. Gathorne-Hardy, G. M., A Short History of International Affairs 1920–1939 (London, 1950), p. 486.Google Scholar

10. Churchill, W. S., Grand Alliance (London, 1950), p. 22.Google Scholar

11. Churchill, W. S., Closing the Ring (London, 1952), p. 167.Google Scholar

12. Cable, op. cit. pp. 196, 199.

13. Lorenz, K., On Aggression (London, 1966), pp. 111–112.Google Scholar

14. Keesing's Contemporary Archives, ix (1952-1954), p. 13733.Google Scholar

15. The Times, 23 April 1969.

16. Barker, A. J., Suez: The Seven Day War (London, 1964), pp. 90–91.Google Scholar

17. Toynbee, A. J., Survey of International Affairs 1934 (London, 1935), p. 536.Google Scholar

18. Ekman and Friesen, op cit. p. 60.

19. Ibid.

20. Austin, J. L., Philosophical Papers (London, 1961). pp. 220–239Google Scholar, quoted in Jervis, op. cit. p. 37.

21. Thomas, H., The Spanish Civil War (London, 1965), pp. 564–565.Google Scholar

22. Keesing's Contemporary Archives, xvii (1969-1970), p. 23544.Google Scholar

23. Ibid, ix (1952–1954) p. 13677; Sir Eden, A., Full Circle (London, 1960), pp. 134–135.Google Scholar

24. Argyle, M., Bodily Communication (New York, 1975), p. 362.Google Scholar

25. Jervis, op. cit. p. 38.

26. See also Schelling, T. C., The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, Mass., 1960)Google Scholar, Chap. 2.

27. Jervis, op. cit. pp. 123–130.

28. New York Times, 26 February-2 March 1977; Africa Diary, xvii (1977), p. 8417.

29. Vagts, A., Defence and Diplomacy (New York, 1956), p. 235Google Scholar, quoted in Jervis, op. cit. p. 135.

30. United States Department of State, Bulletin, xiv, p. 356 (28 April 1946), p. 731.Google Scholar

31. Documents on German Foreign Policy, Series D, iii (London, 1951), p. 27.

32. Wilson, H., The Labour Government 1964–1970 (London, 1971), pp. 178–183Google Scholar; Keesing's Contemporary Archives, xv (1965-1966), pp. 21136Google Scholar, 21175.

33. New York Times, 13 September 1952.

34. Keesing's Contemporary Archives, xi (1957-1958), p. 15563.Google Scholar

35. Schelling, op. cit. pp. 195–199; T. C. Schelling, A rms and Influence (New Haven, 1966).

36. The Times, 11 July 1967.

37. Watt, D. C., Survey of International Affairs 1961 (London, 1965), pp. 604–606.Google Scholar

38. New York Times, 16 December 1971; M. & Kalb, H., Kissinger (Boston, 1974), pp. 259–260Google Scholar; Nixon, R., Memoirs (London, 1978), pp. 525–531.Google Scholar

39. Keesing's Contemporary Archives, xxi (1975), p. 27102.Google Scholar

40. The Guardian Weekly, 11 March 1979.

41. Nixon, op. cit. pp. 937–939.

42. Bernstein, B., ‘Elaborated and Restricted Codes; Their Social Origins and Some Consequences’, The Ethnography of Communication. American Anthropologist, (special edition), 66 (1964)Google Scholar. J. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes (eds.).

43. Cable, op cit. p. 142; Keesing's Contemporary Archives, xvi (1967-1968), pp. 22586–22587.Google Scholar

44. Sorensen, T. C., Kennedy (New York, 1966), pp. 326–346Google Scholar; Thomas, H., Cuba or the Pursuit of Freedom (London, 1971), p. 1368.Google Scholar