Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T13:48:22.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Researching Islam, Security, and the State in Central Asia: A Round Table Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2016

David W. Montgomery ,
John Heathershaw ,
Adeeb Khalid ,
Edward Lemon  and
Tim Epkenhans
David W. Montgomery
Affiliation:
CEDAR—Communities Engaging with Difference and Religion
John Heathershaw
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Adeeb Khalid
Affiliation:
Carleton College
Edward Lemon
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Tim Epkenhans
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As researchers in Central Asian Studies, we discuss the different perspectives our methodological approaches provide to understanding the content and context of Islam, security, and the state in the region. We acknowledge the role of bias in creating narratives that dominate regional and international discourse and question mono-causal explanations of Islamic practice and the roots of radicalism. As such, we offer insights into the challenges and best practices of doing research on Islam and security and posit Central Asian Studies as a case for the value of multi-disciplinary research.

Type
Interim Report from the Field
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 3 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Atkin, Muriel. 1989. The Subtlest Battle: Islam in Soviet Tajikistan. Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Bennigsen, Alexandre, and Broxup, Marie. 1983. The Islamic Threat to the Soviet Union. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bennigsen, Alexandre, and Wimbush, S. Enders. 1985. Mystics and Commissars: Sufism in the Soviet Union. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loic. 1992. An Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Michael. 2000. Commanding Right and Forbidding Wrong in Islamic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2008. “Process Tracing.” In Qualitative Methods in International Relations: a Pluralist Guide edited by Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, 114–130. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d'Encausse, Hélène Carrère. 1978. L'Empire éclaté: la révolte des nations en URSS. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Driscoll, Jesse. 2015. Warlords and Coalition Politics in Post-Soviet States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudoignon, Stéphane A., and Noack, Christian, eds. 2014. Allah's Kolkhozes: Migration, De-Stalinisation, Privatisation, and the New Muslim Congregations in the Soviet Realm (1950s–2000s). Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, Vol. 2, edited by van Dijk, T., 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Greyerz, K. von. 2010. “Ego-Documents: The Last Word?” German History 28 (3): 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh. 2009. “Ethnographic Research.” In Qualitative Methods in International Relations: a Pluralist Guide edited by Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, 93–113. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Heathershaw, John. 2009. Post-Conflict Tajikistan: the Politics of Peacebuilding and the Emergence of Legitimate Order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathershaw, John, and Montgomery, David W.. 2014. The Myth of Post-Soviet Muslim Radicalization in the Central Asian Republics. Chatham House: London.Google Scholar
Husaynī, Saidumar. 2013. Xotiraho az naxust ošnoiyam ba Harakati Islomii Toǧikiston to rasmiyati on [Memoirs from the First Acquaintance with the IRPT until Its Registration]. Dušanbe: Muattar.Google Scholar
Keller, Shoshana. 2001. To Moscow, Not Mecca: The Soviet Campaign against Islam in Central Asia, 1917–1941. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kemper, Michael, Motika, Raoul and Reichmuth, Stefan, eds. 2010. Islamic Education in the Soviet Union and it Successor States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendzior, Sarah. 2011. “Digital Distrust: Uzbek Cynicism and Solidarity in the Internet Age.” American Ethnologist 38 (3): 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalid, Adeeb. 2007. Islam after Communism: Religion and Politics in Central Asia. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Khalid, Adeeb. 2015. Making Uzbekistan: Nation, Empire, and Revolution in the Early USSR. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvale, Steiner, and Brinkmann, Svend. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernest, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and the Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mahmadnazar, A., ed. 1989. Darsi xeštanšinosī; [A Lesson in Self-Awareness]. Dušanbe: Irfon.Google Scholar
Mollinga, Peter. 2008. “Field Research Methodology as Boundary Work.” In Fieldwork in Difficult Environment: Methodology as Boundary Work in Development Research edited by Wall, Caleb R.L. and Mollinga, Peter, 1–18. Berlin: LitVerlag.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2002. “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.” Millennium 31 (3): 627–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olcott, Martha Brill. 1982. “Soviet Islam and World Revolution.” World Politics 34 (4): 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olick, Jeffrey K., and Robbins, Joyce. 1998. “Social Memory Studies: From ‘Collective Memory’ to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1): 105–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Louise, and Jorgensen, Marianne. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ro'i, Yaacov. 2000. Islam in the Soviet Union: From the Second World War to Gorbachev. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Roziq, Zubaydulloh. 2013. HNIT dar masiri taʿrix [The IRPT on the Path of History]. Dušanbe: Muattar.Google Scholar
Rywkin, Michael. 1982. Moscow's Muslim Challenge: Soviet Central Asia. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Tasar, Eren. 2010. “Soviet and Muslim: the Institutionalization of Islam in Central Asia, 1943–1991,” PhD diss., Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tucker, Noah. 2015. Islamic State Messaging to Central Asians Migrant Workers in Russia. George Washington University: CERIA Brief, February.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis edited by Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D. and Hamilton, H., 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wall, Caleb R.L., and Mollinga, Peter, eds. 2008. Fieldwork in Difficult Environment: Methodology as Boundary Work in Development Research. Berlin: LitVerlag.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2009. “Ethnographic Research in the Shadow of Civil War.” In Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power edited by Schatz, Edward, 119–142. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar