Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:48:32.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Best Form of Government: A Perspective on the Continuity of Political Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

James V. Schall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past half-century or so, the world has seen the formation of some one hundred new nation-states, while many of the other fifty-odd political entities have radically altered their previous form of constitution by force, revolution, conquest, election, or change of political philosophy. This has given renewed life to the classical issue about what is the best form of rule under which men ought to live. Political modernization has become a crucial aspect of political science. The external form of almost all these new nation-states, to be sure, even of the most absolute, has almost invariably been some legal variety of “constitutional democracy,” the wording commonly given in modern times to the structure of the best state.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , January 1978 , pp. 97 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Pye, Lucian, Aspects of Political Development (Boston, 1966), chap. 1Google Scholar.

2 “Democracy is probably the greatest political symbol of the modern age,” Wilson, Francis Graham wrote in 1936 (The Elements of Modern Politics, p. 187)Google Scholar.

“The dominant political idea in the modern world is democracy. Most of the contradictions of contemporary politics find their place under the democratic umbrella.… And where are the political theorists of democracy today? … Liberal democratic principles ceased to evolve in the nineteenth century.… Liberal democratic principles ceased to evolve then, but the world did not stop at that point, and it has become a very different place since. Meanwhile democracy, for lack of thought, has ceased to be a living political idea” (Cobban, Alfred, “Ethics and the Decline of Political Theory,” Contemporary Political Thought, eds. , Gould and , Thursby (New York, 1969), p. 293Google Scholar.

3 Cf. “Africa's Record on Human Rights: Millions of People on the Run,” US News, 8 November 1976, pp. 39–40.

4 Cf. Moynihan, Daniel, “The Caged Revolution,” Harper's, 01, 1976Google Scholar.

5 “I confess that in America I saw more than America; I sought there the image of democracy itself, with its inclinations, its character, its prejudices, and its passions in order to learn what we have to fear or to hope from its progress” (de Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America [New York, 1956], I: 15)Google Scholar.

“At the beginning of the twentieth century no political idea seemed more solidly entrenched than that of democracy. Among most bourgeois liberals, intellectuals, and socialists it was esteemed as gospel. Only a few die-hard conservatives, disgruntled cynics, and hard-bitten defenders of direct action appeared to hold out against it. From the great revolutions of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries it had been handed down as a shibboleth to nearly all who were dissatisfied with the relics of despotism and, feudalism that still remained as encumbrances to progress in many countries. So strong was the faith in democracy that it made some headway even in such backward nations as Spain, Russia, and Turkey” (Burns, Edward McNall, Ideas in Conflict [New York, 1960], p. 3)Google Scholar.

6 See my “On the Teaching of Ancient and Medieval Political Theory,” Modern Age, Spring, 1975, pp. 157–66.

7 cf. Partridge, P. H., “Politics, Philosophy, Ideology,” Political Philosophy, ed. Quinton, A. (Oxford, 1967), pp. 32–52Google Scholar.

8 Bay, Christian, “A Critical Evaluation of Behavioral Literature,” Contemporary Political Thought, p. 139Google Scholar.

9 Cf. de Saint-Simon, Henri, “New Christianity,” Social Organization, the Science of Man, and Other Writings, ed. Markham, F. (New York, 1952), pp. 81–116Google Scholar.

10 Bay, , “Behavioral Literature,” p. 158Google Scholar.

11 Pirsig, Robert, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (New York), p. 8Google Scholar.

12 Cf. McCoy, Charles N. R., The Structure of Political Thought (New York, 1963), pp. 138–50Google Scholar.

13 Plato, Republic 546Google Scholar.

14 Republic 544.

15 Aristotle Politics, bk. 3, chap. 14; bk. 4, chap. 10; bk. 5, chaps. 10, 11, 12.

16 Cf. Deane, H., The Political and Social Ideas of St. Augustine (New York, 1963)Google Scholar; Bigongiari, D., “The Political Ideas of St. Augustine,” in The Political Writings of St. Augustine, ed. Paolucci, H. (Chicago, 1962), PP. 343–58;Google ScholarEast, J., “The Political Relevance of St. Augustine,” Modern Age, Spring, 1972, pp. 167–81Google Scholar; Niebuhr, R., “Augustine's Political Realism,” Perspectives on Political Philosophy, ed. Downton, J., (New York, 1971), I:243–57Google Scholar.

17 Speech of 9 July 1975, AFL-CIO, Washington, 1975, p. 30Google Scholar.

18 Address on BBC in The Times, London, 2 04 1976Google Scholar.

19 Speech of 30 June 1975; cf. also Le Monde, 30 May 1975, Interview.

20 See my “Theory in American Politics,” Modern Age, Spring, 1960. Cf. also Kristol, I., “The American Revolution as a Successful Revolution,” America's Continuing Revolution (New York, 1976), pp. 1–21Google Scholar.

21 This is, of course, the burden of much of the work of Eric Voegelin. Cf. especially his The New Science of Politics (Chicago, 1952), chaps. 4 and 6Google Scholar.

22 Cf. Republic 592 and 361.

23 Cf. McCoy, Political Thought, chap. 3. Cf. also my “The Significance of Post-Aristotelean Thought in Political Theory,” Cithara, November, 1963, pp. 56–79.

24 Cf. McCoy, , Political Thought, pp. 82–87Google Scholar. Cf. also McCoy's, “On the Revival of Classical Political Philosophy,” Review of Politics, 35 (1973), 161–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Cf. Cassirer, E., Essay on Man (New Haven, 1944), chap. 1Google Scholar.

26 Romans 13, 1 ff.; 1 Peter 2, 13 ff.

27 Cf. de Coulanges, Fustel, The Ancient City (New York, 1955)Google Scholar.

28 Cf. Christopher, Dawson's two essays on Augustine in St. Augustine (New York, 1957)Google Scholar.

29 “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore he who resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad …” (Romans, 13, 1–3). Cf. also John, chaps. 18 and 19.

30 Cf. Rommen, H., “The Genealogy of Natural Rights,” Thought, Autumn, 1954, pp. 403–25Google Scholar; Morrall, J., Political Thought in Medieval Times (New York, 1962)Google Scholar.

31 Langland, William, Piers the Plowman, trans. Goodridge, J. (Penguin, 1959), pp. 69, 75Google Scholar.

32 Cf. Strauss, Leo, “Marsilius of Padua,” History of Political Philosophy, eds. Strauss, and Cropsey, (New York, 1963), pp. 227–46Google Scholar.

33 See my “Political Theory and Political Theology,” Laval Théologique et Philosophique (Février, 1975), pp. 25–48Google Scholar.

34 Cf. Lederberg, J., “Experimental Genetics and Human Evolution,” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 10, 1966Google Scholar. Cf. also my “On the Nonexistence of Christian Political Philosophy,” Worldview, 04, 1976Google Scholar.

35 See also my “Revolution and Conservation in the Christian Social Perspective,” Studies (Dublin), Summer, 1974, pp. 153–66Google Scholar; “Apocalypse as a Secular Enterprise,” Scottish Journal of Theology, 29, No. 4 (1976), 357–73Google Scholar.

36 Wattenberg, Ben, The Real America (New York, 1976)Google Scholar; Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (New York, 1965)Google Scholar.

37 Wattenberg, , Real America, p. 5Google Scholar. Cf. also in this context Kahn, Herman, The Next 200 Years (New York, 1976)Google Scholar and Macrae, N., “America's Third Century,” Economist, 25 10 1975Google Scholar, Survey.

38 “Political philosophy can coincide with the philosophy of history because the final state replaces the best regime” (Bloom, Allan, “Georg W. F. Hegel,” History of Political Philosophy, p. 651)Google Scholar.

39 Cf. Becker, C., The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers (New Haven, 1932)Google Scholar.

40 Arendt, Revolution, chap. 1.

41 Boorstin, Daniel, The Genius of American Politics (Chicago, 1953)Google Scholar.

42 Moynihan, Daniel, “The American Experiment,” The Public Interest, Fall, 1975Google Scholar.

43 Cf. Mark, Max, Modern Ideologies (New York, 1973)Google Scholar.

44 Plamenatz, John, “The Use of Political Theory,” Political Philosophy, p. 29Google Scholar.

45 Strauss, Leo, “What Is Political Philosophy?” Contemporary Political Thought, p. 64Google Scholar.

46 Republic 613.

47 Republic 361.

48 Republic 613.