Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:13:54.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Campaign and Party Finance in the West German “Party State”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Arthur B. Gunlicks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In contrast to the United States, where there is little or no public financing of parties and candidates below the presidential level, the German “party state” grants generous subsidies in a variety of forms to the political parties, though not to individual candidates. The German Basic Law (constitution), various laws passed by the national and Land (state) parliaments, and the Federal Constitutional Court have been important factors in the development of a complex and costly system of public financing for election campaigns, parliamentary parties and party foundations and for free television and radio time and billboard advertising space. In addition, the federal government incurs large tax expenditures through the encouragement of tax deductible contributions to political parties. In spite of the crucial role which public financing has assumed, recent scandals have occurred involving illegal contributions from business interests. A revised party law of 1984 and a Federal Constitutional Court decision in July 1986 have brought about significant changes, but controversy in Germany over public financing and the impact of recent reforms continues.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , Winter 1988 , pp. 30 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. von Arnim, Hans Herbert, Parteienfinanzierung: Eine verfassungssrechtliche Untersuchung (Wiesbaden: Karl-Bräuer-Institut des Bundes der Steuerzahler, 1982), p. 5 (Geleitwort).Google Scholar

2. The Law on Political Parties, Documents on Politics and Society in the Federal Republic of Germany (Bonn: Inter Nationes, 1978), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

3. Sachverständigen-Kommission, , Bericht zur Neuordnung der Parteienfinanzierung (Köln: Bundesanzeiger Verlag, 1983), p. 35Google Scholar; Gunlicks, Arthur B., “Campaign and Party Finance at the State Level in Germany: The Case of Lower Saxony,” Comparative Politics 12, no. 2 (01 1980): 213.Google Scholar

4. Kulitz, Peter, Untemehmerspenden an politischen Parteien (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1983), pp. 126–30Google Scholar. See also Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichtes (BVerfGE), vol. 6, p. 280Google Scholar and vol. 8, pp. 51 and 64–69.

5. Gunlicks, , “Campaign Party Finance,” p. 214.Google Scholar

6. Abschnitt, Vierter, Gesetz über die politischen Parteien (Parteiengesetz) vom 24. Juli 1967Google Scholar, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I, Nr. 44.

7. Fünfter und Siebenter Absatz, Parteiengesetz vom 24. Juli 1967.

8. Gesetz zur Änderung des Parteiengesetzes vom 22. Juli 1969, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I, Nr. 65.

9. Gesetz zur Änderung des Parteiengesetzes vom 24. Juli 1974, Bundesgesetzblatt, Teil I, Nr. 79.Google Scholar

10. Wewer, Goettrik, “Fragen an die politischen Stiftungen,” Das Parlament (Themenausgabe Parteiendemokratie), Nr. 37–38 (13./20 09 1986), p. 18Google Scholar. For background, see von Vieregge, Henning, Gesellschaftspolitische Stiftungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Baden-Baden, 1980).Google Scholar

11. “Parteispenden: Ueberraschend hohe Grenze,” Das Parlament, Nr. 31 (2 08 1986), p. 7.Google Scholar

12. von Arnim, Hans Herbert, “Verfassungsfragen der Parteienfinanzierung — Teil 1” Juristische Arbeitsblätter 17, Heft 3 (März, 1985), p. 123.Google Scholar

13. Bericht, pp. 99–100Google Scholar; Lösche, Peter, Wovon leben die Parteien? — Ueber das Geld in der Politik (Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1984) p. 18.Google Scholar

14. Kulitz, , Untemehmerspenden, pp. 134–35.Google Scholar

15. Bericht, p. 43.Google Scholar

16. Lösche, , Parteien, p. 48.Google Scholar

17. Ibid., p. 50; Kulitz, , Unternehmnerspenden, pp. 80–83, 139–140.Google Scholar

18. Kulitz, , Untemehmerspenden, pp. 84, 139Google Scholar; Der Spiegel, Nr. 28 (7 07 1986), pp. 17–28.Google Scholar

19. Lösche, , Parteien, pp. 51–52Google Scholar; Kulitz, , Unternehmerspenden, pp. 77–78.Google Scholar

20. Kulitz, , Unternehmerspenden, pp. 141–42.Google Scholar

21. Ibid., p. 143, footnote 96; Bericht, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar

22. Bericht, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

23. Lösche, , Parteien, pp. 58–60.Google Scholar

24. Ibid., p. 20.

25. Bericht, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

26. Ibid., pp. 229–37.

27. von Arnim, Hans Herbert, “Verfassungsfragen der Parteienfinanzierung — Teil 1,” p. 126.Google Scholar

28. Parteiengesetz, Das Deutsche Bundesrecht, 514Google Scholar. Lieferung Februar 1984.

29. For excerpts of the court's decision, see Das Parlament, Nr. 31 (2 08 1986), p. 7.Google Scholar

30. Bundestag, Deutscher, “Bekanntmachung von Rechenschafts-berichten 1986 der politischen Parteien,” Drucksache 11/977 (16.10.87), pp. 18–20 and 173–74.Google Scholar

31. Olzog, Günter, Die politischen Parteien, 16 Auf., (Munich: Olzog Verlag, 1988), p. 66.Google Scholar

32. Der Spiegel, Nr. 48 (23 11 1987), p. 52.Google Scholar

33. The New York Times, 17 02 1987, p. A12Google Scholar; and The German Tribune, 1 03 1987, p. 3.Google Scholar

34. The German Tribune, 21 12 1986, p. 3.Google Scholar