Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Jacques maritain is firmly convinced that every philosopher has some primary intuition that permeates his whole doctrine, and that, consequently, his philosophy can be understood only if one is aware of that primary intuition. For Maritain, as for St. Thomas Aquinas, that primary intuition is the intuition of being (ens) in which both recognize the primacy of esse (the act of existing), and therefore its primacy for the philosopher who studies being. Maritain is constantly aware, from the very beginning of his philosophical reflections, that the philosopher who studies being, starts from the being that is given to him through the senses. This being, which is given to him, actually is but need not be. It is, in short, composed of that which is and the act whereby it is, or, if you will, of essence and existence. Existence must be recognized as having primacy over essence; and the philosopher will be true to reality, and therefore will be in a position to solve problems of reality, only if he respects that primacy.
1 Cf. Ration et Raisons (Paris: Librairie Universelle de France, 1947), 86–87.Google Scholar
2 Cf. Court Traité de l'Existence et de l'Existant (Paris: Paul Hartmann, 1947), 37–38; 63.Google Scholar
3 Cf. De Veritate, 1Google Scholar, 1, c; De Potentia, 7Google Scholar, 2, ad 9.
4 Cf. Maritain, Raissa, Les Grandes Amitiés (New York: Editions de la Maison Française, 1941–1944), II, 201.Google Scholar
5 Scholasticism and Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1940), 58.Google Scholar
6 Cf. Trois Réformateurs, 2 ed. (Paris: Plon, 1930), 33–35.Google Scholar
7 Cf. La Personne et le Bien Commun (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1947), 9–10.Google Scholar
8 Cf. ibid., 28.
9 Cf. ibid., 29.
10 Cf. ibid., 31.
11 Cf. Principes d'une Politique Humamste (Paris: Paul Hartmann, 1945), 15.Google Scholar
12 Cf., ibid., 15.
13 Cf. Les Droits de l'Homme et la Loi Naturelle (New York: Editions de la Maison Française, 1942), 18.Google Scholar
14 Cf. La Personne et le Bien Commun, 36.Google Scholar
15 Cf. Trots Réformateurs, 31.Google Scholar
16 Cf. ibid., 172; Aristotle, , Politics, 1253a.Google Scholar
17 Cf. La Personne et le Bien Commun, 67.Google Scholar
18 Cf. Sort de I'Homme (Neuchâtel: Editions de la Baconnière, 1943), 61.Google Scholar
19 Cf. La Personne et le Bien Commun, 51.Google Scholar
20 Cf. Trots Réformateurs, 274Google Scholar, n. 29.
21 Scholasticism and Politics, 72.Google Scholar
22 Cf. Principes d'une Politique Humaniste, 173.Google Scholar
23 Cf. La Personne et le Bien Commun, 63.Google Scholar
24 Cf. ibid., 63.
25 Cf. Du Règime Temporel et de la Libertè (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1933), 56.Google Scholar
26 Cf. Principes d'une Politique Humaniste, 18.Google Scholar
27 Cf. Confession de Foi (New York: Editions de la Maison Française, 1941), 23.Google Scholar
28 Cf. La Pensée de Saint Paul (New York: Editions de la Maison Française, 1941), 241.Google Scholar
29 Cf. Some Reflections on Culture and Liberty (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1933), 41.Google Scholar
30 Cf. Principes d'une Politique Humaniste, 18.Google Scholar
31 Cf. ibid., 18–19.
32 Cf. ibid., 21.
33 Cf. ibid., 19.
34 Cf. Some Reflections on Culture and Liberty, 47–48.Google Scholar
35 Cf. ibid., 47.
36 Cf. ibid., 48.
37 Cf. ibid., 48–49.
38 Cf. ibid., 49–50.