Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:38:51.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limes Germanicus—Bridge and Frontier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Goetz A. Briefs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is great significance in the recent renaming of the Siegfried line, Germany's line of fortifications in the West. By the will of the Fuehrer, the western fortification is now called Limes. The new name is obviously intended to imply something very specific, otherwise it would not have been chosen.

“Limes”, a Latin word meaning “borderline”, is a word of great significance in Roman as well as German history. The term was first used by the Roman conquerors to signify the line of fortifications which, after many setbacks, they built around the northernmost reaches of their realm. The Roman Limes enclosed what today is die greater part of Bavaria, the rest of Southern Germany, Switzerland and the Rhinelands. Started under the Roman Emperor Domitian in 83 A.D. and finished in the Second Century, the fortifications signified that the Roman impetus of expansion had reached its limit. It meant a consolidation of the earlier conquests against Teutonic invasion from the North and East.

Type
Articles
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1939 , pp. 261 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Scheler, Max, “Von zwei deutschen Krankheiten,” in: Nation und Weltanschauung, Schrifien zur Sociologie und Weltanschauungslehre, Leipzig, 1923, p. 151 ff.Google Scholar

2 Hefele, Herman, “Die römische Wirklichkeit”, in: Wiederbegegnung von Kirche und Kultur in Deutschland, Munchen, 1927, p. 196Google Scholar.

3 Hefele, H., op. cit., p. 201Google Scholar.

4 Ibid., p. 198.

5 Compare also Zieglor, Leopold, Der Europäische Ceist, Darmstadt, 1929, p. 104Google Scholar: the social character of the historically dominant races precludes for any reasonably predictable time “die Wiederverkirchlichung oder gar Wiederverrömischung des Occidens.… weil diesem Character der protestantische Personalismus und Subjectivismus für immer in Fleich und Blut übergegangen ist”. Compare also pp. 102–104.

6 Toennies, Ferdinand, Cemeinschaft und Cesellschaft. Crundbegriffe der reinen Sociologie, 2nd Ed., Berlin, 1912Google Scholar.

7 Ball, Hugo, Die Folgen der Reformation, München und Leipzig, 1924, p. 130Google Scholar.

8 Scheler, M., op. cit, p. 148Google Scholar.

9 Menzer, Paul, “Deutsche Philosophie als Ausdruck deutscher Seele,” in: Kanlstudien, vol. 39, Heft 3–4, p. 275Google Scholar.

10 Hegel, in his Heidelberg Initiation lecture, later on also in his Initiation speech at the Berlin University; cf. Kroner, R., Von Kant bis Hegel, Tübingen, 1921, p. 3Google Scholar.

11 Stein, Lorenz von, Ceschichte der socialen Bewegung in Franlgreich, I, ed. by Salomon, G., Munchen, , 1921, p. 13Google Scholar.