Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:34:48.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pobedonostsev's Conception of the Good Society: An Analysis of His Thought After 1880

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Robert F. Byrnes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Established societies as well as revolutionary organizations and movements have always developed, though often only obscurely, a vision of an ideal society, generally located in the future although often also in the romantic past. For established communities, the goal sought by the society has had tremendous significance because faith in the desirability of the end envisioned has been one of the chief binding forces. Perhaps of even greater importance has been the dynamic stimulus the belief in an ideal society has given to rising revolutionary movements, such as those which have led to the great upheavals of history. The ultimate and ideal goal is particularly significant during times of crisis, when the loyalties of men are shaken and when frequently the factors most decisive in determining a citizen's position are his acceptance of and confidence in the final aims of the group to which he belongs. As an eminent English dramatist once said, a map of the world which does not include the ideal society has little interest for man, for it is upon the shores of such societies that man is always landing.

A study of a conception of the good society is not only an analysis of a source of cohesion and power; it can also shed great illumination upon an entire system of thought. The examination of a philosophy from this angle, that of the ultimate, ideal aims to be achieved, is particularly revealing in the case of Konstantine Petrovich Pobedonostsev, who was lay administrator of the Russian Orthodox Church from 1880 until October, 1905, and was one of the most prominent statesmen in Russia during the last third of the nineteenth century. During the 1880's in particular, he was as powerful in determining the direction of Russian domestic policy as Bismarck was for three decades in guiding the German state.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , April 1951 , pp. 169 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* This article is a product of a Senior Fellowship of the Russian Institute of Columbia University awarded the author for two years for training in the Russian area and for research upon a forthcoming book, The Philosophy of Pobedonostsev.

1 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P., Pisma Pobedonostseva k Aleksandru III (Letters of Pobedonostsev to Alexander III) (Moscow, 1925–1926), II, 330Google Scholar; Bartenev, Peter I., editor, “Iz Dnevnika K. P. Pobedonostseva,” (From the Diary of K. P. Pobedonostsev) Russkii Arhkiv, I (1907) 652Google Scholar; Polovtsov, A. A., editor, Russkii Biograficheskii Slovar (Russian Biographical Dictionary) (St. Petersburg, 1896–1918), XIV, 141–143;Google ScholarGlinski, Boris, “Konstantin Petrovitch Pobedonostsev. Materialy dlia biografii,” (Konstantine Petrovich Pobedonostsev. Materials for His Biography), Istoricheskii Vestnik, CVIII (1907), 251Google Scholar; Labry, Raoul, Alexandre Ivanovich Herzen, 1812–1870 (Paris, 1928), 94Google Scholar; Benardaki, N. and Bogushevicha, I., Ukazatel Statei sereznago soderzhaniia (Index of Articles of Serious Content) (St. Petersburg, 1858), number four, 7;Google ScholarGennadi, Grigori, Spravochnyi Slovar o russkikh pisateliakh (Reference Dictionary of Russian Writers) (Moscow, 1875–1906), II, 149Google Scholar; Sopikov, V. S., Opit Rossiiskoi Bibliografii (Experiment in Russian Bibliography) (St. Petersburg, 1904–1905), part three, 19, 31; part four, 302.Google Scholar

2 Chicherin, Boris N., Vospominaniia. Zemstvo i Moskovskaia Duma (Recollections. The Zemstvo and the Moscow Duma) (Moscow, 1934), 103–104Google Scholar; Pobe-donostsev, Konstantine P., “Vospominaniia o Zubkove,” (Recollections about Zubkov), Russkii Arkhiv, I (1904), 301–305Google Scholar; Gotie, IU. V., “Borba pravitelstvennykh gruppirovok i manifest 29 aprelia 1881 g.,” (The Struggle of the Governmental Groups and the Manifesto of 29 April 1881), Istoricheskie Zapiski, II (1938), 240–299Google Scholar; Nolde, A. E., “Obzor nauchnoi iuridicheskoi deiatelnosti K. P. Pobedonostseva. Nekrolog,” (Survey of the Scientific Juridical Activity of K. P. Pobedonostsev. An Obituary) Zhurnal Ministerstva Narodnoi Prosveshchenniia, VIII (1907), 84–88Google Scholar; Rappoport, A. S., “Pobiedonostzev, The Apostle of Absolutism and Orthodoxy,” Fortnightly Review, n. s. LXXXI (1907), 869–870Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 330–331Google Scholar; Glinski, , loc. cit., 252–254.Google Scholar

3 Almost everything which Pobedonostsev wrote or translated from 1880 until his death in 1907 is available in this country or in western Europe. The only exceptions are minor articles and brief translations; some of these short articles and translations may have been included in his larger works, which are all available.

4 Stead, William T., The Truth about Russia (London, 1889), 324Google Scholar; Novi-kova, Olga A., Russian Memories (London, 1917), 68Google Scholar; White, Andrew, “A Statesman of Russia: Constantine Pobedonostzeff,” Century Magazine, LVI (1898), 114–115Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, I, 8–9, 16–17, 38, 403; II, 10, 316–317;Google ScholarGlinski, , loc. cit., 273–274.Google Scholar

5 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P., K. P. Pobedonostsev i ego korrespondenty: Pisma i zapiski. Novum Regnum (K. P. Pobedonostsev and His Correspondence. Letters and Memoranda. Novum Regnum) (Moscow, 1923), II, 651–652, 965–966Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Moskovskii Sbornik (Moscow Collection) (3rd ed.; Moscow, 1896), 31–52, 84–86, 142–146Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Uchene i uchitel. Pedagogicheskiia zametki (Teaching and the Teacher. Pedagogical Notes) (Moscow, 1904), II, 49–50Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, (translator), Novaia Shkola (The New School) Moscow, 1898, 18–22Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , “Gosudar Imperator Aleksandr Aleksandrovich,” (Tsar Alexander Alexandrovich), Russkii Arkhiv, I (1906), 620Google Scholar; Edmond, Demolins, A Quoi tient la supériorité des Anglo-Saxons (Paris, 1899), 26–27Google Scholar; Spencer, Herbert, The Study of Sociology New York, 1873, 367–371Google Scholar; Nordau, Max, Die conventiollen Lügen der Kulturmenschheit (6th ed.; Chicago, 1884), 142–157Google Scholar; Dillon, E. J. (Lanin, E. B., pseud.), “Constantine Pobedonostseff,” Contemporary Review, LXIII (1893), 588Google Scholar; Chicherin, , op. cit., 105–106Google Scholar; Nolde, , loc. cit. 114Google Scholar; White, , loc. cit., 117Google Scholar; Istorichcskii Vestnik, XLVII (1892), 840.Google Scholar

6 Stead, William T., The M. P. for Russia. Reminiscences and Correspondence of Madame Olga Novikoff (New York, 1909), 37–40Google Scholar; Chicherin, , op. cit., 272–274.Google Scholar

7 General von Schweinitz, Hans, Dcnkwürdigkeiten (Berlin, 1927), II, 223.Google Scholar

8 Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, I, 116–120; II, 38–40, 46–47, 223–226Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Mos–korsHi Sbornik, 3rd ed., 245–251; 4th ed., 258–259.Google Scholar

9 Pobedonostsev, , Moskovikii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 71–76, 140–156, 186–194; 5th ed., 327–331.Google Scholar

10 Pobedonostsev, , “Gosudar,” 619–624Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, I, 170–171; II, 3–4, 46–47, 145Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Novum Regnum, II, 832–835, 1004–1006.Google Scholar In one characteristic attack on parliamentary government, Pobedonostsev remarked that the political machine in a parliamentary system to work effectively required perfect balance. Representation must be mechanical, impersonal, and mathematically perfect. This, he said, was impossible. The mystical relationship between the narod and the state was to accomplish the feat possible only to a perfectly representative system. (Pobedonostsev, , Moskorskii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 31–33.)Google Scholar

11 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P., Proshchanie Moskyi s Tsarem Svoim (The Parting of Moscow from Its Tsar) (Moscow, 1894)Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , “Le Plè“ (Le Play) Russkoe Obozrenie, XXIII (1893), 27Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Moskovskii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 1–2, 46–48, 87–88, 121–122, 247–256Google Scholar; Moskovskii Sbornik, 4th ed., 258–259Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, I, 170–171; II, 3–4, 41–42, 144–145, 205–207Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Novum Regnum, I, 51–54; II, 1004–1005Google Scholar; Dillon, E. J., The Eclipse of Russia (London, 1918), 83Google Scholar; Lenin, Vladimir, Sochineniia (Complete Works) (2nd ed., Moscow, 1932), XVI, 449Google Scholar; Slonimski, L., O velikoi lzhi nashego vremeni (About the Great Lie of Our Time) (St. Petersburg, 1908), 18–21Google Scholar; Firsov, N. N., “Pobedonostsev. Opit kharakteristiki po pismam,”Google Scholar (Pobedonostsev, . A Study of His Character from His Letters), Byloe, XXV (1924), 260.Google Scholar

12 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P., “Iz chernovykh bumag K. P, Pobedonostseva,” (From the Black Pages of K. P. Pobedonostsev), Krasnyi Arkhiv, XVIII (1926), 205Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Moskorskii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 3–9, 12–13, 20–23, 154–156, 216–221Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Puma, II, 79–82, 102–104, 108–110, 191–192, 259–260, 308–309Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Novum Regnum, II, 832–834, 921Google Scholar; Nikolski, N., “K. P. Pobedonostsev,” Tserkornyi Vestnik, XXXIII (1907), 382Google Scholar; Glinski, , loc. cit., 263–264Google Scholar; White, , loc. cit., 113–116Google Scholar; Schweinitz, , Op. cit., II, 243–244, 275, 302, 388, 395–396.Google Scholar

13 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P., Prazdniki gospodni (The Lord's Days), (7th ed.; Moscow, 1905), 14Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, (translator), Osnovnaia konstitutsiia (The Fundamental Constitution) (Moscow, 1897), 21–32, 70–72, 148–151, 174–176Google Scholar; Le Play, Frédérick, La Constitution essentielle de l'humanite (Tours, 1881)Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Moskovskii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 33–34, 186–194Google Scholar; Moskovskii Sbornik, 5th ed., 151–156, 327–331Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , “Gosudar,“ 619–621Google Scholar; Bompard, Maurice, Mon Ambassade en Russie, 1903–1908 (Paris, 1937), 257–258Google Scholar; Mikhailovich, Grand Prince Alexander, Vospomirumia (Recollections) (Paris, 1933), 189Google Scholar; Dostoevski, Feodor, The Brothers Karamazov (New York, Modern Library, 1929), 300.Google Scholar

14 Pobedonostsev, , “Le-Plè,” 14–15.Google Scholar

15 Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 38–41, 223–225.Google Scholar

16 Pobedonostsev, (translator), Osnovnaia konstitutsiia, preface, XLII, 1–6, 82–87Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , “Le-Ple,” 10, 14–15Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 147–148Google Scholar; Vestnik Evropi, number five, 1889, 820–821.Google Scholar

17 Pobedonostsev, , Uchene, 5th ed., I, 35; 1st ed., II, 15–19, 42–48Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Novum Regnum, II, 865–866.Google Scholar

18 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P., Vechnaia Pamiat (In Memoriam) (Moscow, 1896), 14–16Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Uchene, 5th ed., I, 31–38; 1st ed., II, 38–54Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Maskorskii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 68–76Google Scholar; Moskovskii Sbornik, 5th ed., 297–298Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Novaia Shkola, preface, 3–4, 25–30, 69–72, 95–102Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 27–28Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , “Gosudar,” 620–624Google Scholar; White, Andrew, Autobiography (New York, 1905), 144Google Scholar; Hans, Nicholas, History of Russian Educational Policy (London, 1931), 155–156Google Scholar; Istorichcskii Vestnik, LXXV (1899), 645.Google Scholar

19 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P. (translator), Istoriia detskoi dushi (The Story of a Child's Soul) (Moscow, 1897)Google Scholar; Corelli, Marie, The Mighty Atom (Philadelphia, 1896)Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Moskovskii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 268–274Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Prazdniki, 10–11, 16–20, 26–27, 31–32, 48–51, 55–58, 64Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 271Google Scholar; Vrba, Rudolf, Russland und der Panslavismus (Prague, 1913), II, 170.Google Scholar

20 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P. (translator), Pobeda, pobedivshaia mir (Triumphant Peace) (10th ed.; Moscow, 1905), 16–49, 57–92, 133–184Google Scholar; Lilly, William S., Chapters in European History (London, 1886), I, 49–87Google Scholar; The Confessions of St. Augustine (New York, 1927), 1–40Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Osnovnaia Konstitutsiia, 117–120.Google Scholar

21 Boudou, Adrien, Le Saint-Siège et la Russie (Paris, 1922), II, 539–544Google Scholar; Curtiss, John S., Church and State in Russia (New York, 1940), 170Google Scholar; Volkhovsky, F. V., “The Philosophy of Reaction,” Free Russia, X (1899), 90Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 11–13, 323–325Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Novum Regnum, II, 896Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , “Gosudar,” 622.Google Scholar

22 Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 308–309.Google Scholar

23 Pobedonostsev, Konstantine P., “Russia and Popular Education. A Reply to Prince Kropotkin,” North American Review, CLXXIII (1901), 349–354Google Scholar; Pobedonstsev, , Mas–kovskii Sbornik, 3rd ed., 45–47, 208–216; 4th ed., 50–55; 5th ed., 54–57Google Scholar; White, , loc. cit., 114–116Google Scholar; Volkhovsky, , loc. cit., 90.Google Scholar

24 Pobedonostsev, , Vechnaia Pamiat, 62Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Prazdniki, 4, 41–43Google Scholar; Bompard, , op. cit., 257–258.Google Scholar

25 Pobedonostsev, , Pisma, II, 47–51, 108–110, 146Google Scholar; Pobedonostsev, , Uchene, 1st ed., II, 11–12Google Scholar; White, , op. cit., 69–70.Google Scholar