Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:19:22.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response: The History of Liberal Political Philosophy Revisited - Katrina Forrester: In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019. Pp. 432.)

Review products

Katrina Forrester: In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019. Pp. 432.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2022

Katrina Forrester
Katrina Forrester*
Affiliation:
Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
A Symposium on Katrina Forrester's In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , Summer 2022 , pp. 440 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Kornhauser, Anne M., Debating the American State: Liberal Anxieties and the New Leviathan, 1930–1970 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015)Google Scholar; and Amadae, S. M, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

2 Murad Idris, “Islam, Rawls, and the Disciplinary Limits of Late Twentieth-Century Liberal Philosophy,” Modern Intellectual History 18, no. 4 (2021): 1034–57.

3 This line of critique was first put to me by Danielle Allen, by Melissa Schwartzberg in a forum on In the Shadow of Justice in October 2019 at New York University, and by Battistoni in H-Diplo Roundtable XXI-24 on In the Shadow of Justice (Jan. 2020). See also Sophie Smith, “Historicizing Rawls,” Modern Intellectual History 18, no. 4 (2021): 906–39.

4 Smith opens the door to this criticism when she paraphrases my call to look to “social theory, history, and political struggle” as a call to look to “social movements and history” (“Historicizing Rawls,” 939).

5 Nancy Fraser and Rahel Jaeggi, Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018). I develop this theme in Katrina Forrester, “Liberalism and Social Theory after John Rawls”, Analyse & Kritik, forthcoming 2022.

6 Erin Pineda, Seeing Like an Activist (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).

7 For example see Brandon M. Terry and Tommie Shelby, introduction to To Shape a New World: Essays on the Political Philosophy of Martin Luther King Jr., ed. Terry and Shelby (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018), 1–15.

8 See, for example, Táíwò, Olúfẹ́mi O., Reconsidering Reparations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Bo Harvey, “Political Philosophy after Forrester's Rawls,” Legal Form: A Forum for Marxist Analysis and Critique, Jan. 3, 2022, https://legalform.blog/2022/01/03/harvey-forrester-rawls/.