Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:37:42.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Significance of Lucrezia in Machiavelli's La Mandragola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Susan Behuniak-Long
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The “fall” of Lucrezia in Machiavelli's play La Mandragola is a puzzlement. She is presented as an intelligent and virtuous wife who by play's end not only agrees to commit adultery but murder as well. Any attempt to interpret the play must address the significance of Lucrezia and her fall. It is argued here, however, that the real deception is that Lucrezia does not undergo a conversion—she is of questionable character from the start. Upon examination, her similarity with the Goddess Fortuna reveals a deeper tale being told within the play. Machiavelh uses her to mock the Church, and St. Augustine in particular, and to deliver a frightening message that the free will is no match for the goddess.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , Spring 1989 , pp. 264 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I am indebted to Charles D. Tarlton for sharing his ideas and resources, and to Michael C. O'Neill for introducing me to the theater arts.

I have used the following sources and translations of Machiavelli's works: La Mandragola, trans. Mera Flaumenhaft (Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1981); “Capitoli di Fortuna,” trans. Joseph Tusiani in Lust and Liberty (New York: Ivan Obolensky, Inc., 1963); The Prince, trans. Luigi Ricci (Mentor Book, 1952); and The Discourses, trans. Luigi Ricci (New York: Random House, 1950). In addition, I used Livy's From the Founding of the City, trans. B. O. Foster (London: William Heinemann, Ltd., 1919), and St. Augustine's City of God, trans. Marcus Dods (New York: Random House, Inc., 1950). Numbers within parentheses indicate the page number of the appropriate text.

1. Lord, Carnes, “On Machiavelli's Mandragola,” Journal of Politics, 41 (1979): 811–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Radcliff-Umstead, Douglas, The Birth of Modern Comedy in Renaissance Italy (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1969), p. 128.Google Scholar

3. Bondanella, Peter E., Machiavelli and the Art of Renaissance History (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1971), p. 114.Google Scholar

4. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel, Fortune Is a Woman: Gender and Pblitics in the Thought of Niccolo Machiavelli (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), pp. 47–48.Google Scholar

5. Sumberg, Theodore A., “La Mandragola: An Interpretation,” Journal of Pblitics 23 (1961): 339.Google Scholar

6. Burke, Kenneth, The Philosophy of Literary Form (New York: Vintage Books, 1957);Google ScholarA Grammar of Motives (Cleveland: World Publishing Co., 1962);Google ScholarLanguage as Symbolic Action (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966).Google Scholar

7. Sumberg, , “La Mandragola: An Interpretation,” p. 338.Google Scholar

8. Frye, Northrop, Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), p. 164.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., pp. 169–170.

10. Kennard, Joseph Spencer, The Italian Theatre: From Its Beginning to the Close of the Seventeenth Century (New York: Benjamin Bloom, Inc., 1964), p. 113.Google Scholar

11. Beuf, Carlo, Cesare Borgia: The Machiavellian Prince (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1942);Google ScholarCorvo, Frederick Baron, A History of the Borgias (New York: Random House, 1931);Google ScholarGregorovius, Ferdinand, Lucretia Borgia, trans. Garner, John Leslie (New York: Benjamin Bloom, 1968).Google Scholar

12. Sumberg, , “La Mandragola: An Interpretation,” p. 330.Google Scholar

13. Rebhorn, Wayne A., Foxes and Lions: Machiavelli's Confidence Men (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988), p. 54.Google Scholar

14. See Pitkin's discussion of Machiavelli's images of women, Fortune, pp. 109–169.Google Scholar

15. Tarlton, Charles D., Fortune's Circle: A Biographical Interpretation of Niccolo Machiavelli (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970), p. 155.Google Scholar

16. Tarlton, Charles D., “The Symbolism of Redemption and the Exorcism of Fortune in Machiavelli's Prince,” Review of Politics 30 (1968): 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Fleisher, Martin, “Trust and Deceit in Machiavelli's Comedies,” Journal of the History of Ideas 27 (1966): 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Pitkin, , Fortune, p. 144;Google ScholarPatch, Howard Rollin, “The Tradition of the Goddess Fortuna in Roman Literature and in the Transitional Period,” Smith College Studies in Modern Language 3 (1922): 151.Google Scholar

19. Discourses, pp. 380–83;Google ScholarJacobson, Norman, Pride and Solace: The Functions and Limits of Political Theory (New York: Methuen, Inc., 1986), p. 32.Google Scholar

20. See Sumberg, “La Mandragola: An Interpretation”; Lord, “On Machiavelli's Mandragola”; Hulliung, Mark “Machiavelli's Mandragola: A Day and a Night in the Life of a Citizen,” Review of Politics 40 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

21. Flaumenhaft, Mera J., “The Comic Remedy: Machiavelli's ‘Mandragola',” Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy 1 (1978): 40.Google Scholar

22. Sumberg, , “La Mandragola: An Interpretation,” p. 337;Google ScholarHulliung, , “Machiavelli's Mandragola” p. 47.Google Scholar

23. Mazzeo, Joseph Anthony, Renaissance and Seventeenth Century Studies (New york: Columbia University Press, 1964), p. 153.Google Scholar

24. Herrick, Marvin T., Italian Comedy in the Renaissance (Urbana: The University of Illinois Press, 1960), p. 80.Google Scholar

25. Oreglia, Giacomo, The Commedia dell'Arte (New York: Hill and Wang, 1968), p. 3;Google ScholarNicoll, Allardyce, Masks, Mimes and Miracles (New York: Cooper Square Publishers, Inc., 1963),Google Scholar and The World of Harlequin: A Critical Study of the Commedia dell'Arte (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

26. Michael C. O'Neill suggested this point during a guest lecture in my political theory class at Wilkes College.

27. This point is discussed by Flaumenhaft, “The Comic Remedy,” p. 52.Google Scholar

28. Mazzeo, , Renaissance, p. 92.Google Scholar

29. Patch, , “Tradition of the Goddess Fortuna,” p. 135.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., pp. 138, 141.

31. Ibid., p. 149.

32. Ibid., p. 132.

33. Ibid., p. 131.

34. Ibid., p. 132.

35. Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Birth of Tragedy, trans. Kaufmann, Walter (New York: Random House, 1967).Google Scholar

36. Frye, , Anatomy of Criticism, p. 164.Google Scholar

37. Flaumenhaft, Mera J., Mandragola (Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc., 1981), p. 4.Google Scholar