Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-stzjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T14:04:26.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TRANSITIVITY AND INTRANSITIVITY IN EVIDENTIAL SUPPORT: SOME FURTHER RESULTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2012

WILLIAM ROCHE
WILLIAM ROCHE*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Texas Christian University
*
*DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY, 2800 S. UNIVERSITY DR. FORT WORTH, TX 76129. E-mail:w.roche@tcu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Igor Douven establishes several new intransitivity results concerning evidential support. I add to Douven’s very instructive discussion by establishing two further intransitivity results and a transitivity result.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Symbolic Logic , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 259 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Chandler, J. (2010). The transmission of support: A Bayesian re-analysis. Synthese, 176, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douven, I. (2011). Further results on the intransitivity of evidential support. Review of Symbolic Logic, 4, 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eells, E., & Sober, E. (1983). Probabilistic causality and the question of transitivity. Philosophy of Science, 50, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitelson, B. (2008). A decision procedure for probability calculus with applications. Review of Symbolic Logic, 1, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanen, M. (1971). Confirmation and adequacy conditions. Philosophy of Science, 38, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. (1970). Theories and the transitivity of confirmation. Philosophy of Science, 37, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, L. (2010). Wright, Okasha and Chandler on transmission failure. Synthese. To appear. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9771-x.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. (2004). Wright on the transmission of support: A Bayesian analysis. Analysis, 64, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pynn, G. (2011). The Bayesian explanation of transmission failure. Synthese. To appear. doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-9890-z.Google Scholar
Roche, W. (2012). A weaker condition for transitivity in probabilistic support. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shogenji, T. (2003). A condition for transitivity in probabilistic support. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 613–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (2002). (Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, 330–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. (2003). Some reflections on the acquisition of warrant by inference. In Nuccetelli, S., editor. New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 57–77.Google Scholar