Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:16:04.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

C-terminal interaction of translational release factors eRF1 and eRF3 of fission yeast: G-domain uncoupled binding and the role of conserved amino acids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

KANAE EBIHARA
Affiliation:
Department of Tumor Biology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, P.O. Takanawa, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
YOSHIKAZU NAKAMURA
Affiliation:
Department of Tumor Biology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, P.O. Takanawa, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Translation termination in eukaryotes requires a stop codon-responsive (class-I) release factor, eRF1, and a guanine nucleotide-responsive (class-II) release factor, eRF3. Schizosaccharomyces pombe eRF3 has an N-terminal polypeptide similar in size to the prion-like domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae eRF3 in addition to the EF-1α-like catalytic domain. By in vivo two-hybrid assay as well as by an in vitro pull-down analysis using purified proteins of S. pombe as well as of S. cerevisiae, eRF1 bound to the C-terminal one-third domain of eRF3, named eRF3C, but not to the N-terminal two-thirds, which was inconsistent with the previous report by Paushkin et al. (1997, Mol Cell Biol 17:2798–2805). The activity of S. pombe eRF3 in eRF1 binding was affected by Ala substitutions for the C-terminal residues conserved not only in eRF3s but also in elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-1α. These single mutational defects in the eRF1–eRF3 interaction became evident when either truncated protein eRF3C or C-terminally altered eRF1 proteins were used for the authentic protein, providing further support for the presence of a C-terminal interaction. Given that eRF3 is an EF-Tu/EF-1α homolog required for translation termination, the apparent dispensability of the N-terminal domain of eRF3 for binding to eRF1 is in contrast to importance, direct or indirect, in EF-Tu/EF-1α for binding to aminoacyl-tRNA, although both eRF3 and EF-Tu/EF-1α share some common amino acids for binding to eRF1 and aminoacyl-tRNA, respectively. These differences probably reflect the independence of eRF1 binding in relation to the G-domain function of eRF3 (i.e., probably uncoupled with GTP hydrolysis), whereas aminoacyl-tRNA binding depends on that of EF-Tu/EF-1α (i.e., coupled with GTP hydrolysis), which sheds some light on the mechanism of eRF3 function.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 RNA Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)