Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:36:41.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Algebraic methods in mechanism analysis and synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2007

Manfred L. Husty*
Affiliation:
University Innsbruck, Institute of Basic Sciences in Engineering, Unit Geometry and CAD, Technikerstraße 13, A6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Martin Pfurner
Affiliation:
University Innsbruck, Institute of Basic Sciences in Engineering, Unit Geometry and CAD, Technikerstraße 13, A6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Hans-Peter Schröcker
Affiliation:
University Innsbruck, Institute of Basic Sciences in Engineering, Unit Geometry and CAD, Technikerstraße 13, A6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Katrin Brunnthaler
Affiliation:
University Innsbruck, Institute of Basic Sciences in Engineering, Unit Geometry and CAD, Technikerstraße 13, A6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: manfred.husty@uibk.ac.at

Summary

Algebraic methods in connection with classical multidimensional geometry have proven to be very efficient in the computation of direct and inverse kinematics of mechanisms as well as the explanation of strange, pathological behavior. In this paper, we give an overview of the results achieved within the last few years using the algebraic geometric method, geometric preprocessing, and numerical analysis. We provide the mathematical and geometrical background, like Study's parametrization of the Euclidean motion group, the ideals belonging to mechanism constraints, and methods to solve polynomial equations. The methods are explained with different examples from mechanism analysis and synthesis.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Angeles, J., Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems. Theory, Methods and Algorithms (Springer, New York, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Dickenstein, A. and Emiris, I. Z., Solving Polynomial Equations, Foundations, Algorithms and Applications (Springer, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
3.Blaschke, W., Kinematik und Quaternionen. Mathematische Monographien (Springer, Berlin, 1960).Google Scholar
4.Study, E., Geometrie der Dynamen (B. G. Teubner, Leipzig, 1903.Google Scholar
5.Husty, M. L., Karger, A., Sachs, H. and Steinhilper, W., Kinematik und Robotik (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Mc Carthy, J. M., Geometric Design of Linkages, Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics (Springer, New York, 2000) vol. 320.Google Scholar
7.Selig, J. M., Geometric Fundamentals of Robotics. Monographs in Computer Science (Springer, New York, 2005.Google Scholar
8.Giering, O., Vorlesungen über höhere Geometrie (Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig, 1983.Google Scholar
9.Husty, M., “On the Workspace of Planar Three-Legged Platforms,” Proceedings of the ISRAM – World Congress of Automation, Montpellier, France (1996) pp. 17901796.Google Scholar
10.Bottema, O. and Roth, B., Theoretical Kinematics (Dover, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
11.Brunnthaler, K., Pfurner, M. and Husty, M., “Synthesis of planar four-bar mechanisms, CSME Trans. 30 (2), 297313 (2006).Google Scholar
12.Husty, M., Pfurner, M. and Schröcker, H.-P., “A New and Efficient Algorithm for the Inverse Kinematics of a General Serial 6R,” Proceedings of ASME 2005 29th Mechanism and Robotics Conference, Long Beach (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Husty, M., Pfurner, M. and Schröcker, H.-P.: “A new and efficient algorithm for the inverse kinematics of a general serial 6R manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 42 (1), 6681 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Husty, M.: “An algorithm for solving the direct kinematic of general Stewart–Gough platforms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 31 (4), 365380 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Husty, M. and Karger, A., “Self-Motions of Griffis-Duffy Type Platforms,” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco (2000) pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
16.Husty, M. and Karger, A., “Self Motions of Stewart–Gough Platforms, an Overview,” Proceedings of the Workshop on Fundamental Issues and Future Research Directions for Parallel Mechanisms and Manipulators, Quebec City (2002) pp. 131–141.Google Scholar
17.Denavit, J. and Hartenberg, R. S., “A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices,” J. Appl. Mech. 77, 215221 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Pfurner, M., Analysis of Spatial Serial Manipulators Using Kinematic Mapping. Ph.D. Thesis (Innsbruck: Universität Innsbruck, 2006).Google Scholar
19.Naas, J. and Schmid, H. L., Mathematisches Wörterbuch, Band II (Akademie-Verlag Berlin, 1974).Google Scholar
20.Harris, J., “Algebraic Geometry: A First Course,” In: Graduate Texts in Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1995) vol. 133.Google Scholar
21.Pfurner, M. and Husty, M., “Determining the Motion of Overconstrained 6R Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the IFToMM World Congress, Besançon (2007) to be published.Google Scholar
22.Baker, J. E., “On the Motion Geometry of the Bennett Linkage,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Engineering Computer Graphics and Descriptive Geometry, Austin, Texas (1998) pp. 433437.Google Scholar
23.Suh, C. H. and Radcliffe, C. W., Kinematics and Mechanisms Designs (Wiley, Canada, 1978.Google Scholar
24.Perez, A., Analysis and Design of Bennett Linkages. Ph.D. Thesis (Irvine, CA: University of California, 2004).Google Scholar
25.Brunnthaler, K., Synthesis of 4R Linkages Using Kinematic Mapping. Ph.D. Thesis (Innsbruck: Universität Innsbruck, 2007).Google Scholar
26.Brunnthaler, K., Schröcker, H.-P. and Husty, M. L., “A New Method for the Synthesis of Bennett Mechanisms,” Proceedings of CK 2005, Cassino, Italy (2005).Google Scholar