Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:55:11.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometric model of the DCR-LAI compliant device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

A. Jutard ,
T. Redarce ,
A. Fakri  and
M. Betemps
A. Jutard
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Automatique Industrielle, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex (France)
T. Redarce
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Automatique Industrielle, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex (France)
A. Fakri
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Automatique Industrielle, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex (France)
M. Betemps
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Automatique Industrielle, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex (France)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In this paper the authors present a mathematical model of geometric and kinematic behaviour of an original passive compliant device provided with two rotation centres, called DCR–LAI system. This device is designed for a robotic assembly of parts with very small tolerances including a chamfer at the hole. The given modélisation may be used as a decision aid for the choice of a compliant device with regard to characteristics of parts being assembled.

Keywords

Robotic assemblyAutomationComplianceArticulated devices
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 151 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fakri, A., “Conception, modélisation et simulation de la structure compliante passive DCR pour robot d'assemblage” Thesis-INSA-LYON I. DO. (09 18, 1985).Google Scholar
2.Drake, S.H., “Using compliance in lieu of sensory feedback for automatic assembly” D.Sc. Thesis (MIT, 1977).Google Scholar
3.Nevins, J.L., “Folded remote center compliance device” U.S. Patent 4,355,469 (10 26, 1982).Google Scholar
4.Whitney, D.E., “Damped remote center compliance device” U.S. Patent 4,379,363 (04 12, 1983).Google Scholar
5.McCallion, H., Alexander, K.V. and Pham, D.T., “Aids for automatic assembly Proc 1st Int. conf. on Assembly Automation313–323 (Brighton, 03, 1980).Google Scholar
6.Rouget, J.P., “Contribution a l'étude structurelle et fonctionnelle d'organes compliants passifs pour robots d'assemblage” Theses BESANÇON (07, 1983).Google Scholar
7.Fakri, A., Jutard, A. and Liegois, , “Poignet compliant passif” Brevet français 84 05265 (03 30, 1984).Google Scholar
8.Fakri, A., Jutard, A. and Liegois, G., “Passive compliant wrist with two rotation centres for assembly robot” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Assembly Automation 235–241 (Paris, 05, 1984).Google Scholar
9.Jutard, A. and Fakri, A., “Le poignet compliant passif à double centre de rotation” 3e Journées Automatisation et robotique Avancées (CNRS) L11-L24 (Toulouse, 09, 1984).Google Scholar
10.Jutard, A., “Adapatabilité robot-tâche” Journées-Bilan du programme Automatisation et Robotique Avancées (CNRS) (Paris, 05, 1986).Google Scholar