Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:22:28.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An approach to automatic robots programming in the flexible manufacturing cell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Paweł Rogalinski
Paweł Rogalinski
Affiliation:
Institute of Engineering Cybernetics Technical University of Wroclaw, Janizewskiego 11/17, 50–372 Wroclaw (Poland)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The paper presents an approach to automatic synthesis of program for robots in a flexible manufacturing cell (FMC). The system of program generation consists of two layers: Task-Level Programming Layer and Program Interpretation and Verification Layer. The first layer uses robot-independent planning techniques to create a work plan for robots (set of elementary actions) and program for each elementary action. The second layer uses robot-dependent planning methods to plan robot's trajectories and calculate the robot's motion times. A simulation model of whole FMC, which is created based on a description of FMC and program for robots, makes possible evaluation of efficiency of FMC work.

Keywords

Flexible manufacturing cellPipeline production processDeadlock avoidanceRobot programmingSimulation
Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , May 1994 , pp. 263 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jockovic, M., Vukobratovic, M. and Ognjanovic, Z., “An Approach to the Modeling of the Highest Control Level of Flexible Manufacturing Cell” Robotica 8, Part 2, 125–130 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Jacak, W. and Rozenblit, J.W, “Automatic Simulation of a Robot Program for a Sequential Manufacturing Process” Robotica 10, Part 1, 45–56 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Faverjon, B., “Object Level Programming of Industrial Robots” IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2 (1986) pp. 1406–1411.Google Scholar
4. Speed, R., “Off-line Programming of Industrial Robots” Proc. of ISIR 87, (1987) pp. 2110–2123.Google Scholar
5. Jacak, W., “A Discrete Kinematic Model of Robot in the Cartesian Space” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automa-don 5(4), 435–446 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Rozenblit, J.W and Zeigler, B.P, “Design and Modelling Concepts” International Encyclopedia of Robotics, Applications and Automation, (ed., Dorf, R.) (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988) pp. 308–322.Google Scholar
7. Zeigler, B.P, “Multifacetted Modelling and Discrete Event Simulation” (Academic Press, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
8. Banaszak, Z. and Roszkowska, E., “Deadlock Avoidance in Concurrent Processes” Foundations of Control, 18, Nos. 1–2, 3–17 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Krogh, B.H and Banaszak, Z., “Deadlock Avoidance in Pipeline Concurrent Processes” Proc. of 22-nd Conf. on Information Sciences and Systems, Princeton, New Jersey (03, 1988) pp. 45–49.Google Scholar
10. Banaszak, Z. & Krogh, B.H, “Deadlock Avoidance in Flexible Manufacturing Systems with Concurrently Competing Process Flows” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 6(6), 724–734 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Mello, L.S Homer De and Sanderson, A.C, “AND/OR Graph Representation of Assembly Plans” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 6(2), 188–199 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lozano-Perez, T., “Task-Level Planning of Pick-and-Place Robot Motions,” IEEE Trans. on Computer 38(3) 21–29 (1989).Google Scholar
13. Ramadge, P.J and Wonham, W.M, “The Control of Discrete Event Systems” Proc. of the IEEE 77(1) 81–97 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Jacak, W., “Strategies for Searching Collision-Free Manipulator Motions: Automata Theory Approach” Robotica 7, Part 2, 129–138 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Shin, K.G and McKay, N.D, “A Dynamic Programming Approach to Trajectory Planning of Robotic Manipulators” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 31(6), 491–500 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Shin, K.G and McKay, N.D, “Minimum-Time Control of Robotic Manipulators with Geometric Paths Constraints” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 30(6), 531–541 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Jacak, W., Duleba, I. and Rogalinski, P., “A Graph-Searching Approach to Trajectory Planning of Robot's Manipulator” Robotica 10, Part 6, 531–537 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Jacak, W. and Rozenblit, J.W, “Simulation-based Intelligent Control of Workcell Planning” IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation (in print).Google Scholar