Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:40:20.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Derivation of optimal walking motions for a bipedal walking robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

P. H. Channon
Affiliation:
Intelligent Systems Research Group, School of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, University of Wales College of Cardiff, P.O. Box 904, Cardiff, Wales, CF1 3YH. (UK)
S. H. Hopkins
Affiliation:
Intelligent Systems Research Group, School of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, University of Wales College of Cardiff, P.O. Box 904, Cardiff, Wales, CF1 3YH. (UK)
D. T. Pham
Affiliation:
Intelligent Systems Research Group, School of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, University of Wales College of Cardiff, P.O. Box 904, Cardiff, Wales, CF1 3YH. (UK)

Summary

The problem of determining energy optimal walking motions for a bipedal walking robot is considered. A full dynamic model of a planar seven-link biped with feet is derived including the effects of impact of the feet with the ground. Motions of the hip and feet during a regular step are then modelled by 3rd order polynomials, the coefficients of which are obtained by numerically minimising an energy cost function. Results are given in the form of walking profiles and energy curves for the specific cases of motion over level ground, motion up and down an incline, and varying payload.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Beletskii, V.V. and Chudinov, P.S., “Parametric Optimisation in the Problem of Biped LocomotionMechanics of Solids 12, No 1, 2535 (1977).Google Scholar
2.Velershtein, R.A. and Formalskii, A.M., “Movement of an Anthropomorphic Mechanism With Feet Under Impulsive Actions, Single Support Phase IMechanics of Solids 14, No 5, 2433 (1979).Google Scholar
3.Velershtein, R.A. and Formalskii, A.M., “Movement of an Anthropomorphic Mechanism With Feet Under Impulsive Actions, Double Support Phase IIMechanics of Solids 15, No 1, 4147 (1980).Google Scholar
4.Beletskii, V.V., Berbyuk, V.E. and Samsonov, V.A., “Parametric Optimisation of Motions of a Bipedal Walking RobotMechanics of Solids 17, No 1, 2840 (1982).Google Scholar
5.Rutkovskii, S.V., “Walking, Skipping and Running of a Bipedal Robot With Allowance For ImpactMechanics of Solids 20, No 5, 4651 (1985).Google Scholar
6.Channon, P.H., Hopkins, S.H. and Pham, D.T., “Simulation and Optimisation of Gait for a Bipedal Robot' Mathl Comput. Modelling 14, 463467 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Channon, P.H., “Modelling and Control of a Bipedal Walking Robot” PhD Thesis (University of Wales, 1990).Google Scholar
8.McGeer, T., “Powered Flight, Child's Play, Silly Wheels and Walking MachinesIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, USA 3, 15921597 (1989).Google Scholar