Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:45:26.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design, analysis and optimization of Hex4, a new 2R1T overconstrained parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2018

Lingmin Xu ,
Genliang Chen ,
Wei Ye  and
Qinchuan Li
Lingmin Xu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China. E-mails: xulingmin1993@163.com, wye@zstu.edu.cn
Genliang Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-Walled Structures, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. E-mail: leungchan@sjtu.edu.cn
Wei Ye
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China. E-mails: xulingmin1993@163.com, wye@zstu.edu.cn
Qinchuan Li*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China. E-mails: xulingmin1993@163.com, wye@zstu.edu.cn
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: lqchuan@zstu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

PMs with two rotations and one translation (2R1T) have been used as skeletons in various advanced manufacturing equipment where high accuracy and stiffness are basic requirements. Considering the advantages of redundant actuation and overconstrained structure, such as reduced singularities and improved stiffness, a new 2R1T overconstrained PM with actuation redundancy, called Hex4, is proposed in this paper. This is a 2-PUR/2-RPU PM (where P denotes an actuated prismatic joint, U a universal joint, and R a revolute joint) that is actuated by four prismatic joints. Compared with some existing 2R1T overconstrained PMs with actuation redundancy, the main advantage of the proposed PM is that the heavy motors of two limbs are mounted on the base to reduce the movable mass and improve dynamic response. First, mobility analysis, inverse kinematics, and velocity analysis are presented. Then, the local transmission index and good transmission workspace are used to evaluate the motion/force transmissibility of the Hex4 PM. The variation tendencies of the two indices with different link parameters are investigated. The singularity is then discussed by considering the motion/force transmissibility. Finally, link parameters are optimized to obtain an improved good transmission workspace. It is shown that the proposed PM has a good potential for high precision applications.

Keywords

Parallel manipulatorActuation redundancyOverconstrained structureOptimal design
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , February 2019 , pp. 358 - 377
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hunt, K. H., “Structural kinematics of in-parallel-actuated robot-arms,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 105 (4), 705–712 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Wahl, J., “Articulated tool head,” WIPO Patent No. WO/2000/025976 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Bi, Z. M. and Jin, Y., “Kinematic modeling of Exechon parallel kinematic machine,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27 (1), 186–193 (2011).Google Scholar
4. Siciliano, B., “The Tricept robot: Inverse kinematics, manipulability analysis and closed-loop direct kinematics algorithm,” Robotica 17 (17), 437–445 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Li, Q. C. and Hervé, J. M., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF RPR-equivalent parallel mechanisms,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 30 (6), 1333–1343 (2014).Google Scholar
6. Stoughton, R. S. and Arai, T., “A modified stewart platform manipulator with improved dexterity,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 9 (2), 166–173 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Clavel, R., “A Fast Robot with Parallel Geometry,” Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Lausanne, Switzerland (1988) pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
8. Merlet, J. P., “Redundant parallel manipulators,” Lab. Rob. Autom. 8 (1), 17–24 (1996).Google Scholar
9. Kim, S., “Operational Quality Analysis of Parallel Manipulators with Actuation Redundancy,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico (Apr. 1997) pp. 2651–2656.Google Scholar
10. Wang, J. S., Wu, J., Li, T. M. and Liu, X. J., “Workspace and singularity analysis of a 3-DOF planar parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy,” Robotica 27 (1), 51–57 (2009).Google Scholar
11. Saglia, J. A., Dai, J. S. and Caldwell, D. G., “Geometry and kinematic analysis of a redundantly actuated parallel mechanism that eliminates singularities and improves dexterity,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 130 (12), 124501 (2008).Google Scholar
12. Kim, S. H., Jeon, D., Shin, H. P., In, W. and Kim, J., “Design and analysis of decoupled parallel mechanism with redundant actuator,” I. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 10 (4), 93–99 (2009).Google Scholar
13. Wang, C. Z., Fang, Y. F., Guo, S. and Chen, Y. Q., “Design and kinematical performance analysis of a 3-RUS/RRR redundantly actuated parallel mechanism for ankle rehabilitation,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 5 (4), 1585–1606 (2013).Google Scholar
14. Gouttefarde, M. and Gosselin, C. M., “Wrench-closure workspace of six-DOF parallel mechanism driven by 7 cables,” Trans. CSME/de la SCGM, 29 (4), 541–552 (2005).Google Scholar
15. Bouchard, S., Gosselin, C. M. and Moore, B., “On the ability of a cable-driven robot to generate a prescribed set of wrenches,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 2 (1), 47–58 (2010).Google Scholar
16. Garg, V., Carretero, J. A. and Nokleby, S. B., “A new method to calculate the force and moment workspaces of actuation redundant spatial parallel manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 1 (1), 402–421 (2009).Google Scholar
17. Gardner, J. F., Kumar, V. and Ho, J. H., “Kinematics and Control of Redundantly Actuated Closed Chains,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, (1989) pp. 418–424.Google Scholar
18. Kumar, V. and Gardner, J. F., “Kinematics of redundantly actuated closed kinematic chains,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 6 (2), 269–274 (1999).Google Scholar
19. Kim, J., Park, F. C., Ryu, S. J., Kim, J., Hwang, J. C., Park, C. and Iurascu, C. C., “Design and analysis of a redundantly actuated parallel mechanism for rapid machining,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 17 (4), 423–434 (2001).Google Scholar
20. Zhang, D. and Lei, J., “Kinematic analysis of a novel 3-DOF actuation redundant parallel manipulator using artificial intelligence approach,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 27 (1), 157–163 (2011).Google Scholar
21. Zhang, D., Gao, Z., Su, X. P. and Li, J., “A comparison study of three degree-of-freedom parallel robotic machine tools with/without actuation redundancy,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 25 (3), 230–247 (2012).Google Scholar
22. Shin, H., Lee, S., Jeong, J. I. and Kim, J., “Antagonistic stiffness optimization of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators in a predefined workspace,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics. 18 (3), 1161–1169 (2013).Google Scholar
23. Wang, L. P., Wu, J., Wang, J. S. and You, Z., “An experimental study of a redundantly actuated parallel manipulator for a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics. 14 (1), 72–81 (2009).Google Scholar
24. Wu, J., Wang, J. S., Wang, L. P. and Li, T. M., “Dexterity and stiffness analysis of a three-degree-of-freedom planar parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 221 (8), 961–969 (2007).Google Scholar
25. Saglia, J. A., Tsagarakis, N. G., Dai, J. S. and Caldwell, D. G., “A high-performance redundantly actuated parallel mechanism for ankle rehabilitation,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 28 (9), 1216–1227 (2009).Google Scholar
26. Jin, Y., Kong, X. W. and Higgins, C., “Kinematic Design of a New Parallel Kinematic Machine for Aircraft Wing Assembly,” Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Beijing, China (2012) pp. 669–674.Google Scholar
27. Kiper, G. and Bağdadioğlu, B., “Function Generation Synthesis with a 2-DoF Overconstrained Double-Spherical 7R Mechanism Using the Method of Decomposition and Least Squares Approximation,” In: New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science: From Fundamentals to Industrial Applications (Flores, P. and Viadero, F., eds.) (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015) 24, pp. 175–183.Google Scholar
28. Li, Q. C., Zhang, N. B. and Wang, F. B., “New indices for optimal design of redundantly actuated parallel manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Robot 9 (1), 011007 (2017).Google Scholar
29. Xu, L. M., Li, Q. C., Zhang, N. B. and Chen, Q. H., “Mobility, kinematic analysis, and dimensional optimization of new three-degrees-of-freedom parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy,” ASME J. Mech. Robot 9 (4), 041008 (2017).Google Scholar
30. Li, Q. C., Xu, L. M., Chen, Q. H. and Ye, W., “New family of RPR-equivalent parallel mechanisms: Design and application,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 30 (2), 217–221 (2017).Google Scholar
31. Stoughton, R. S. and Arai, T., “A modified stewart platform manipulator with improved dexterity,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 9 (2), 166–173 (1993).Google Scholar
32. Angeles, J. and López-Cajún, C. S., “Kinematic isotropy and the conditioning index of serial robotic manipulators,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 11 (6), 560–571 (1992).Google Scholar
33. Merlet, J. P., “Jacobian, manipulability, condition number, and accuracy of parallel robots,” ASME J. Mech. Robot 128 (1), 199–206 (2006).Google Scholar
34. Ball, R. S., A Treatise on the Theory of Screws (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1900).Google Scholar
35. Yuan, M. S. C., Freudenstein, F. and Woo, L. S., “Kinematic analysis of spatial mechanism by means of screw coordinates: Part 2-Analysis of spatial mechanisms,” J. Eng. Indus. 91 (1), 67–73 (1971).Google Scholar
36. Sutherland, G. and Roth, B., “A transmission index for spatial mechanisms,” J. Eng. Indu. 95 (2), 589–597 (1973).Google Scholar
37. Tsai, M. J. and Lee, H. W., “Generalized evaluation for the transmission performance of mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 29 (4), 607–618 (1994).Google Scholar
38. Wang, J. S., Wu, C. and Liu, X. J., “Performance evaluation of parallel manipulators: Motion/force transmissibility and its index,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45 (10), 1462–1476 (2010).Google Scholar
39. Xie, F. G., Liu, X. J. and Zhou, Y. H., “Optimization of a redundantly actuated parallel kinematic mechanism for a 5-degree-of-freedom hybrid machine tool,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 228 (12), 1630–1641 (2014).Google Scholar
40. Xie, F. G., Liu, X. J. and Zhou, Y. H., “Development and experimental study of a redundant hybrid machine with five-face milling capability in one setup,” I. J. Precis. Eng. Man 15 (1), 13–21 (2014).Google Scholar
41. Huang, Z. and Li, Q. C., “Type synthesis of symmetrical lower-mobility parallel mechanisms using the constraint-synthesis method,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 22 (1), 59–79 (2003).Google Scholar
42. Hervé, J. M., “Analyse structurelle des mécanismes par groupe des déplacements,” Mech. Mach. Theory 13 (4), 437–450 (1978).Google Scholar
43. Tao, D. C., Applied Linkage Synthesis (Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 1964).Google Scholar
44. Gosselin, C. M. and Angeles, J., “Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains,” IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 6 (3), 281–290 (1990).Google Scholar
45. Liu, X. J., Wu, C. and Wang, J. S., “A new approach for singularity analysis and closeness measurement to singularities of parallel manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Robot 4 (4), 61–68 (2012).Google Scholar
46. Kelaiaia, R., Company, O. and Zaatri, A., “Multiobjective optimization of parallel kinematic mechanisms by the genetic algorithms,” Robotica 30 (5), 783–797 (2012).Google Scholar
47. Moore, R. E., Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis (Studies in Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1979).Google Scholar
48. Merlet, J. P., “Interval Analysis and Robotics,” Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Robotics Research, Hiroshima, Japan (Nov., 2007) pp. 147–156.Google Scholar
49. Liu, X. J. and Wang, J. S., “A new methodology for optimal kinematic design of parallel mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 42 (9), 1210–122 (2007).Google Scholar