Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:03:22.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimensional Synthesis and Performance Evaluation of Four Translational Parallel Manipulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2020

I. Ben Hamida ,
M. A. Laribi Open the ORCID record for M. A. Laribi [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Mlika ,
L. Romdhane  and
S. Zeghloul
I. Ben Hamida
Affiliation:
Department of GMSC, Pprime Institute, CNRS, University of Poitiers, ENSMA, UPR 3346, France. E-mails: ines.ben.hamida@univ-poitiers.fr, said.zeghloul@univ-poitiers.fr Mechanical Laboratory of Sousse, National Engineering School of Sousse, University of Sousse, Tunisia. E-mails: abdelfattah.mlika@eniso.u-sousse.tn, lotfi.romdhane@gmail.com, lromdhane@aus.edu
M. A. Laribi*
Affiliation:
Department of GMSC, Pprime Institute, CNRS, University of Poitiers, ENSMA, UPR 3346, France. E-mails: ines.ben.hamida@univ-poitiers.fr, said.zeghloul@univ-poitiers.fr
A. Mlika
Affiliation:
Mechanical Laboratory of Sousse, National Engineering School of Sousse, University of Sousse, Tunisia. E-mails: abdelfattah.mlika@eniso.u-sousse.tn, lotfi.romdhane@gmail.com, lromdhane@aus.edu
L. Romdhane
Affiliation:
Mechanical Laboratory of Sousse, National Engineering School of Sousse, University of Sousse, Tunisia. E-mails: abdelfattah.mlika@eniso.u-sousse.tn, lotfi.romdhane@gmail.com, lromdhane@aus.edu Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, PO Box 26666 Sharjah, UAE
S. Zeghloul
Affiliation:
Department of GMSC, Pprime Institute, CNRS, University of Poitiers, ENSMA, UPR 3346, France. E-mails: ines.ben.hamida@univ-poitiers.fr, said.zeghloul@univ-poitiers.fr
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: med.amine.laribi@univ-poitiers.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The optimum selection of a structure for a given application is a capital phase in typological synthesis of parallel robots. To help in this selection, this paper presents a performance evaluation of four translational parallel robots: Delta, 3-UPU, Romdhane-Affi-Fayet, and Tri-pyramid (TP). The problem is set as a multiobjective optimization using genetic algorithm methods, which uses kinematic criteria, that is, global dexterity and compactness, to ensure a prescribed workspace. The results are presented as Pareto fronts, which are used to compare the performances of the aforementioned structures. The obtained results show that the TP robot has the best kinematic performance, whereas the 3-UPU robot is the most compact for a given prescribed workspace.

Keywords

Dimensional synthesisCompactnessDexterityGenetic algorithm
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , February 2021 , pp. 233 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clavel, R., “DELTA, A Fast Robot with Parallel Geometry,” Proceedings of 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robots 1988 (1988) pp. 91–100.Google Scholar
Hervé, J. M. and Sparacino, F., “Star, a New Concept in Robotics,” International Conference 3K-ARK, Ferrara, Italy (1992) pp. 176–183.Google Scholar
Tsai, L., Walsh, G. C. and Stamper, R. E., “Kinematics of a Novel Three DOF Translational Platform,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE lntemational Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, Minnesota (1996) pp. 3446–3451.Google Scholar
Romdhane, L., Affi, Z. and Fayet, M., “Design and singularity analysis of a 3-translational-DOF in-parallel manipulator,” J. Mech. Des. 124(3), 419–426 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, X.-W. and Gosselin, C. M., “Kinematics and singularity analysis of a novel type of 3-CRR 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 21(9), 791–798 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonev, I., “Delta Parallel Robot—the Story of Success,” The Parallel Mechanisms Information Center (2000) pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Chablat, D. C., Wenger, P. and Merlet, J., “A Comparative Study Between Two Three-DOF Parallel Kinematic Machines Using Kinetostatic Criteria and Interval Analysis,” Proceedings of the 11th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science (2004) pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Stock, M. and Miller, K., “Optimal kinematic design of spatial parallel manipulators: Application to linear Delta robot,” J. Mech. Des. 125(2), 292 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yunjiang, L., Yongsheng, Z., Huang, R., Xin, C. and Zexiang, L., “Optimization algorithms for kinematically optimal design of parallel manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 11(2), 574–584 (2014).Google Scholar
Kelaiaia, R., Company, O. and Zaatri, A., “Multiobjective optimization of a linear Delta parallel robot,” Mech. Mach. Theory (50), 159–178 (2012).Google Scholar
Kelaiaia, R., Zaatri, A., Company, O. and Chikh, L., “Some investigations into the optimal dimensional synthesis of parallel robots,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 83(9–12), 1525–1538 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamwal, P. K., Xie, S. Q., Tsoi, Y. H. and Aw, K. C., “Forward kinematics modelling of a parallel ankle rehabilitation robot using modified fuzzy inference,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45(11), 1537–1554 (2010).Google Scholar
Laribi, M. A., Romdhane, L. and Zeghloul, S., “Analysis and dimensional synthesis of the DELTA robot for a prescribed workspace,” Mech. Mach. Theory 42(7), 859–870 (2007).Google Scholar
Laribi, M. A., Mlika, A., Romdhane, L. and Zeghloul, S., “Robust optimization of the RAF parallel robot for a prescribed workspace,” Mech. Mach. Sci. (50), 383–393 (2018).Google Scholar
Ben Hamida, I., Laribi, M. A., Mlika, A., Romdhane, L. and Zeghloul, S., “Geometric Based Approach for Workspace Analysis of Translational Parallel Robots,” ROMANSY 22 – Robot Design, Dynamics and Control. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol. 584 (2019) pp. 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, L.-W., “Kinematics of a Three-DOF Platform with Three Extensible Limbs,” In: Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics (Lenarèiè, J. and Parenti-Castelli, V., eds.) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996) pp. 401–410.Google Scholar
Zeng, Q., Ehmann, K. F. and Cao, J., “Tri-pyramid robot: Design and kinematic analysis of a 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 30(6), 648–657 (2014).Google Scholar
Gosselin, C. and Angeles, J., “A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators,” J. Mech. Des. 113(3), 220 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar