Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:37:57.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of payloads contact upon the coupled dynamic response of two cooperating robots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

G. Shagal  and
S.A. Meguid
G. Shagal
Affiliation:
Engineering Mechanics & Design Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4 (Canada)
S.A. Meguid
Affiliation:
Engineering Mechanics & Design Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A4 (Canada)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The coupled dynamic response of two cooperating robots handling two flexible payloads is treated using a new algorithm. In this algorithm, the dynamic equations describing the system are obtained using Lagrange's method for the rigid robot links and the finite element method for the flexible payloads. The contact between the flexible payloads is modelled using the penalty function method and a contact search algorithm is employed to identify the contact region.

Keywords

Robot dynamicsFixtureless assemblyCoupled responseFinite element method.
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , November 1996 , pp. 659 - 665
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Asada, H. and Slotine, J.E., Robot Analysis and Control (Wiley, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
2.Vukobratovic, M., Applied Dynamics of Manipulation Robots. Modelling, Analysis and Examples (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989).Google Scholar
3.Sunada, W. and Dubrowsky, S., “The Application of Finite Element Methods to the Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Spatial and Co-Planar Linkage Systems” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 103, 643–651 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Sunada, W.H. and Duborsky, S., “On the Dynamic Analysis and Behaviour of Industrial Robotic Manipulators with Elastic Members” ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 105, 42–51 (1983).Google Scholar
5.Chang, L.W. and Hamilton, J.F. “Dynamics of Robotic Manipulators With Flexible Links” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 113, 54–59 (03, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Luh, J.Y. and Zheng, Y.F., “Constrained Relations between Two Coordinated Industrial Robots for Motion Control” Int. J. Robotics Research 6, no 3, 60–70 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Nakamura, Y., Nagai, K. and Yoshikawa, T. “Dynamics and Stability in Coordination of Multiple Robotic Mechanisms” Int. J. Robotics Research 8, No 2, 44–61 (1989).Google Scholar
8.Yoshkawa, T. and Zheng, H.Z., “Coordinated Dynamic Control for multiple Robotic Mechanisms Handling an Object” IEEE/RSJ Int. Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS '91, Osaka, Japan (11 3–5, 1991) pp. 315–320.Google Scholar
9.Lilly, K.W. and Orin, D.E., “Efficient Dynamic Simulation of Multiple Chain Robotic Mechanisms” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 116, 223–231 (06, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hu, Y.R. and Goldenberg, A.A. “An Approach to Motion and Force Control of Coordinated Robot Arms in the Presence of Joint Flexibility” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 116, 326–335 (09, 1996).Google Scholar
11.Fattach, A., Angeles, J. & Misra, A.K., “Dynamics of a Flexible-Link Planar Parallel Manipulator in Cartesian Space” Proc. ASME Design Automation Conference, DE69(2) 2, 483–490 (1996).Google Scholar
12.Fattach, A., Angeles, J. & Misra, A.K., “Dynamics of Two Cooperating Flexible-Link Manipulators” Proc. of 15th Canad. Congress of Appl. Mech.,Victoria, Canada(May 28-June 1, 1995), Vol 2, pp. 800–801.Google Scholar
13.Sun, Q., Sharf, I. and Nation, M., “Stable Solution for the Inverse Dynamics Problem of Flexible-Link Cooperating Manipulators” Proc. of 15th Canad. Congress of Appl Mech.,Victoria, Canada(May 28-June 1, 1995) Vol 2, pp. 798–799.Google Scholar
14.Krishnamurthy, K. and Yang, L., “Dynamic modelling and simulation of two cooperating structurally-flexible robotic manipulators” Robotica 13, Part 4, 375–384 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Gao, W., “Tracking Flexible Objects by Multiple Robot Systems” IEEE/RSJ Int. Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS '91,Osaka, Japan(Nov. 3–5, 1991) pp. 309–314.Google Scholar
16.Bouffard-Vercelli, Y., Dauchez, P., Degoulange, E. & Delebarre, X., “Manipulation of Flexible Objects with a two-Arm Robot” Robotics and Flexible Manufacturing Systems (Gentine, J.C. and Tzafestas, S.G., Editors), (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, 1992) pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
17.Zheng, Y.F. and Chen, M.Z., “Trajectory Planning for Two Manipulators to Deform Flexible Beams” Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation,Atlanta GA, USA (1993) Vol 1, pp. 1019–1024.Google Scholar
18.Mills, J.K., “Multi-Manipulator Control for Fixtureless Assembly for Elastically Deformable Parts” Proc. Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation (1992) Vol 1, pp. 1565–1572.Google Scholar
19.Mills, J.K. and Ing, J., “Robotic Fixtureless Assembly of Sheet Metal Parts Using Dynamic Finite Element Models: Modelling and Simulation” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation,Nagoya, Japan(May 21–27, 1995) pp. 2530–2537.Google Scholar
20.Zhong, Z.H., Finite Element Procedures for Contact-Impact Problems (Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Huang, H.C., Static and Dynamic Analyses of Plates and Shells: Theory, Software and Applications (London, NY, Springer-Verlag, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Schilling, R.J., Fundamentals of Robotics. Analysis & Control (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1990).Google Scholar