Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:43:46.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elastostatic contact imaging for a mechanoreceptive tactile device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

M. Mehdian ,
P.M. Johns-Rahnejat  and
H. Rahnejat
M. Mehdian
Affiliation:
Robotics & Machine Intelligence Group, School of Engineering, University of Greenwich, Woolwich, London SE18 6PF(UK).
P.M. Johns-Rahnejat
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2BX(UK).
H. Rahnejat
Affiliation:
TEDAS Ltd, University of Warwick Science Park, Sir William Lyons Road, Coventry CV47EZ (UK).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper presents a sensory gripper, consisting of two tactile sensing matrices which acquire three dimensional images of objects of interest. The image processing algorithm uses elastostatic contact information to discriminate among a host of parts made of different materials. The algorithm also enables the assessment of orientation of parts without the pre-requisite of having to recognise them. The positions of stable holdsites and a safe gripping force are also evaluated.

Keywords

Imaging; Sensory gripper; Electrostatic contact.
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , July 1993 , pp. 329 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Harmon, L.D., “Automated Tactile Sensing” Int. J. Robotics Res. 1(2), 3–32 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Foroughi, F., Rahnejat, H. and Bera, H., “Tactile Sensors for Robot Handling” Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 201(B/B1), 53–59 (1987).Google Scholar
[3]Mehdian, M. and Rahnejat, H., “A Tactile Sensor with Automatic Learning Capability for Industrial Parts Inspection” Int. J. AMT 2(4), 11–26 (1987).Google Scholar
[4]Sato, N., Heginbotham, W.B. and Pugh, A., “A Method for Three Dimensional Part Identification by Tactile Trans-ducer” Proc. 7th Int. Sympos. on Industrial Robots (1977) pp. 123–129.Google Scholar
[5]Rahnejat, H. and Bera, H., “Sensors, Special Purpose” Encyclopedia of Robotics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
[6]Benhadj, R., Sadeque, S. and Rahnejat, H., “A Knowledge-Based System for Sensor Interaction and Real-Time Component Control” Int. J. AMT 3(1), 14–29 (1988).Google Scholar
[7]Abu-Mostafa, Y.S. and Psaltis, D., “Image Normalisation by Complex Moments” IEEE Trans, on Pattern Ana. & Mach. Intell. PAMI–7(1), 423–434 (1985).Google Scholar
[8]Checinski, S.S. and Agrawal, A.K., “Magnetoelastic Tactile Sensor” 3rd Int. Conf. on Robot Vision & Sensory Contr. (ROVISEC-3), Cambridge, MASS. (1983), pp. 348–359.Google Scholar
[9]Hanafusa, H. and Asada, H., “An Adaptive Control of Robot Hand Equipped With Pneumatic Proximity Sensors”, 3rd Int. Conf. on Industrial Robots Tokyo, (1978) 564–576.Google Scholar
[10]Mehdian, M. and Rahnejat, H., “A Sensory Gripper Using Tactile Sensors for Object Recognition, Orientation and Stable Manipulation” IEEE Trans. Man, Mach & Cyber. 19, No. 5, 1250–1261 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Boussinesq, J., Application des Potentials a VEtude de Equilibre et du Mouvement des Solides Elastiques (Gauthier-Villars, Paris 1885).Google Scholar
[12]Hu, M.K., “Visual Pattern Recognition by Moment Invariants” IRE Trans, on Info. Theory IT-8, 106–117 (1962).Google Scholar
[13]Timoshenko, S.P. and Goodier, J.N., Theory of Elasticity 3rd Edition (McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, 1970).Google Scholar