Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:15:34.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental investigation and propulsion control for a bio-inspired robotic undulatory fin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2015

Michael Sfakiotakis ,
John Fasoulas ,
Manolis M. Kavoussanos  and
Manolis Arapis
Michael Sfakiotakis*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
John Fasoulas
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
Manolis M. Kavoussanos
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
Manolis Arapis
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: msfak@staff.teicrete.gr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Undulatory fin propulsion, inspired by the locomotion of aquatic species such as electric eels and cuttlefish, holds considerable potential for endowing underwater vehicles with enhanced propulsion and maneuvering abilities, to address the needs of a growing number of applications. However, there are still gaps in our understanding of the effect of the fin undulations' characteristics on the generated thrust, particularly within the context of developing propulsion control strategies for such robotic systems. Towards this end, we present the design and experimental evaluation of a robotic fin prototype, comprised of eight individually-actuated fin rays. An artificial central pattern generator (CPG) is used to produce the rays' undulatory motion pattern. Experiments are performed inside a water tank, with the robotic fin suspended from a carriage, whose motion is constrained via a linear guide. The results from a series of detailed parametric investigations reveal several important findings regarding the effect of the undulatory wave kinematics on the propulsion speed and efficiency. Based on these findings, two alternative strategies for propulsion control of the robotic fin are proposed. In the first one, the speed is varied through changes in the undulation amplitude, while the second one involves simultaneous adjustment of the undulation frequency and number of waves. These two strategies are evaluated via experiments demonstrating open-loop velocity control, as well as closed-loop position control of the prototype.

Keywords

Undulatory fin propulsionbio-inspired robotic locomotioncentral pattern generatorsunderwater robots
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 33 , Special Issue 5: Robotics in the Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD 2013) , June 2015 , pp. 1062 - 1084
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Webb, P., “Maneuverability - general issues,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 29 (3), 547–555 (2004).Google Scholar
2. Sfakiotakis, M., Lane, D. and Davies, J., “Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 24 (2), 237–252 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Lindsey, C. C., “Form, function and locomotory habits in fish,” In Fish Physiology vol. VII Locomotion (Hoar, W. and Randall, D., eds.) (Academic Press, New York, 1978) pp. 1–100.Google Scholar
4. Barrett, D. S., Triantafyllou, M. S., Yue, D. K. P., Grosenbaugh, M. A. and Wolfgang, M. J., “Drag reduction in fish-like locomotion,” J. Fluid Mech. 392, 183–212 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Anderson, J. and Chhabra, N., “Maneuvering and stability performance of a robotic tuna,” Integrative Comparative Biol. 42 (1), 118–126 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Liu, J., Dukes, I. and Hu, H., “Novel Mechatronics Design for a Robotic Fish,” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'05), Edmonton, Canada (2005) pp. 807–812.Google Scholar
7. Wen, L., Wang, T., Wu, G. and Liang, J., “Quantitative thrust efficiency of a self-propulsive robotic fish: Experimental method and hydrodynamic investigation,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 18 (3), 1027–1038 (2013).Google Scholar
8. Bandyopadhyay, P., “Trends in biorobotic autonomous undersea vehicles,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 30 (1), 109–139 (2005).Google Scholar
9. Geder, J., Ramamurti, R., Pruessner, M. and Palmisano, J., “Maneuvering Performance of a Four-Fin Bio-Inspired UUV,” Proceedings MTS/IEEE International Conference (OCEANS'13) (Sep. 2013) pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
10. Korsmeyer, K., Steffensen, J. and Herskin, J., “Energetics of median and paired fin swimming, body and caudal fin swimming, and gait transition in parrotfish (Scarus schlegeli) and triggerfish (Rhinecanthus aculeatus),” J. Exp. Biol. 205 (9), 1253–1263 (2002).Google Scholar
11. Hu, T., Shen, L., Lin, L. and Xu, H., “Biological inspirations, kinematics modeling, mechanism design and experiments on an undulating robotic fin inspired by Gymnarchus niloticus,” Mech. Mach. Theory 44 (3), 633–645 (2009). Special Issue on Bio-Inspired Mechanism Engineering.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ruiz-Torres, R., Curet, O. M., Lauder, G. V. and MacIver, M. A., “Kinematics of the ribbon fin in hovering and swimming of the electric ghost knifefish,” J. Exp. Biol. 216, 823–834 (2013).Google Scholar
13. Lighthill, M. J. and Blake, R. W., “Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. 1. Biological background, and analysis by elongated-body theory,” J. Fluid Mech. 212, 183–207 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Wang, S., Dong, X. and Shang, L.-J., “Thrust Analysis of the Undulating Ribbon-fin for Biomimetic Underwater Robots,” Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Control and Information Processing (ICICIP'11), no. Part 1, pp. 335–340.Google Scholar
15. Zhang, Y.-H., He, J.-H., Yang, J., Zhang, S.-W. and Low, K., “A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of an undulatory mechanical fin driven by shape memory alloy,” Int. J. Autom. Comput. 3, 374–381 (2006).Google Scholar
16. Shirgaonkar, A., Curet, O., Patankar, N. and MacIver, M., “The hydrodynamics of ribbon-fin propulsion during impulsive motion,” J. Exp. Biol. 211 (21), 3490–3503 (2008).Google Scholar
17. Sfakiotakis, M., Lane, D. M. and Davies, B. J., “An Experimental Undulating-fin Device using the Parallel Bellows Actuator,” Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA'01), Seoul, Korea (2001) pp. 2356–2362.Google Scholar
18. Willy, A. and Low, K., “Initial Experimental Investigation of Undulating Fin,” Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'05), Edmonton, Canada (2005) pp. 1600–1605.Google Scholar
19. Epstein, M., Colgate, J. E. and MacIver, M. A., “Generating Thrust with a Biologically-Inspired Robotic Ribbon Fin,” Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'06), Beijing, China (2006) pp. 2412–2417.Google Scholar
20. Low, K., “Mechatronics and buoyancy implementation of robotic fish swimming with modular fin mechanisms,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 221 (3), 295–309 (2007).Google Scholar
21. Zhang, D., Hu, D., Shen, L. and Xie, H., “Design of an artificial bionic neural network to control fish-robot's locomotion,” Neurocomputer 71 (4–6), 648–654 (2008).Google Scholar
22. Chen, J., Hu, T., Lin, L., Xie, H. and Shen, L., “Learning control for biomimetic undulating fins: An experimental study,” J. Bionics Eng. 7, S191–S198 (2010).Google Scholar
23. Shang, L., Wang, S., Tan, M. and Cheng, L., “Swimming locomotion modeling for biomimetic underwater vehicle with two undulating long-fins,” Robotica 30 (6), 913–923 (2012).Google Scholar
24. Sfakiotakis, M., Arapis, M., Spyridakis, N. and Fasoulas, J., “Development and Experimental Evaluation of an Undulatory fin Prototype,” Proceedings 22nd International Workshop on Robotics in Alpe-Adria-Danube Region (RAAD'13), Portoroz, Slovenia (2013) pp. 280–287.Google Scholar
25. Rosenberger, L. J., “Pectoral fin locomotion in batoid fishes: Undulation versus oscillation,” J. Exp. Biol. 204 (2), 379–394 (2001).Google Scholar
26. Albert, J., “Species diversity and phylogenetic systematics of american knifefishes (Gymnotiformes, Teleostei),” Miscellaneous Publications, Mus. Zoology, Univ. Michigan 190, 1–127 (2001).Google Scholar
27. Standen, E. and Lauder, G., “Dorsal and anal fin function in bluegill sunfish Lepomis macrochirus: Three-dimensional kinematics during propulsion and maneuvering,” J. Exp. Biol. 208 (14), 2753–2763 (2005).Google Scholar
28. Lauder, G. V. and Madden, P., “Learning from fish: Kinematics and experimental hydrodynamics for roboticists,” Int. J. Autom. Comput. 3, 325–335 (2006).Google Scholar
29. Blevins, E. L. and Lauder, G. V., “Rajiform locomotion: Three-dimensional kinematics of the pectoral fin surface during swimming in the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon orbignyi ,” J. Exp. Biol. 215 (18), 3231–3241 (2012).Google Scholar
30. Kier, W. M., “The fin musculature of cuttlefish and squid (mollusca, cephalopoda): Morphology and mechanics,” J. Zoology (London) 217, 23–28 (1989).Google Scholar
31. Daniel, T. L., Jordan, C. and Grunbaum, B., “Hydromechanics of swimming,” Mechanics of Animal Locomotion (Alexander, R., ed.) Advances in Comparative and Environmental Physiology, vol. 11 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992) pp. 17–49.Google Scholar
32. Fei, L., Tian-jiang, H., Guang-ming, W. and Lin-cheng, S., “Locomotion of Gymnarchus niloticus: Experiment and kinematics,” J. Bionics Eng. 2 (3), 115–121 (2005).Google Scholar
33. Blake, R. W., “Swimming in the electric eels and knifefishes,” Can. J. Zoology J. Can. De Zoologie 61 (6), 1432–1441 (1983).Google Scholar
34. Breder, C. M. and Edgerton, H. E., “An analysis of the locomotion of the seahorse, Hippocampus hudsonius, by means of high speed cinematography,” Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 43, 145–172 (1942).Google Scholar
35. Neveln, I. D., Bale, R., Bhalla, A. P. S., Curet, O. M., Patankar, N. A. and MacIver, M. A., “Undulating fins produce off-axis thrust and flow structures,” J. Exp. Biol. 217, 201–213 (2014).Google ScholarPubMed
36. Curet, O., Patankar, N., Lauder, G. and MacIver, M. A., “Mechanical properties of a bio-inspired robotic knifefish with an undulatory propulsor,” Bioinspiration Biomimetics 6 (2), 026004 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Blake, R. W., “On balistiform locomotion,” J. Marine Biol Assoc. United Kingdom 58, 73–80 (1978).Google Scholar
38. Dong, X., Wang, S., Cao, Z. and Tan, M., “CPG Based Motion Control for an Underwater Thruster with Undulating Long-Fin,” Proceedings 17th IFAC World Congress, Seoul, Korea (2010) pp. 5433–5438.Google Scholar
39. Sproewitz, A., Moeckel, R., Maye, J. and Ijspeert, A. J., “Learning to move in modular robots using Central Pattern Generators and online optimization,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 27 (3–4), 423–443 (2008).Google Scholar
40. Zhou, C. and Low, K. H., “Kinematic Modeling Framework for Biomimetic Undulatory Fin Motion based on Coupled Nonlinear Oscillators,” Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'10), Taipei, Taiwan (Oct. 18–22, 2010) pp. 934–939.Google Scholar
41. Sfakiotakis, M. and Fasoulas, J., “Development and Experimental Validation of a Model for the Membrane Restoring Torques in Undulatory Fin Mechanisms,” Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE Medit erranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED'14), Palermo, Italy (2014) pp. 1540–1546.Google Scholar

Sfakiotakis supplementary material

Video S1

Download Sfakiotakis supplementary material(Video)
Video 42.5 MB