Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:51:08.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fundamental problems of robot control: Part II A nonlinear circuit theory towards an understanding of dexterous motions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Suguru Arimoto
Suguru Arimoto
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113 Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Part II continues to develop a hyper-stability framework for presenting physical interpretations of dexterous motion controls, such as hybrid position/force, impedance, model-based adaptive, learning control and coordination. In all cases passivity induced by introduction of a quasi-natural potential plays a key role. In view of these considerations, the final section discusses the possibility of development of a nonlinear circuit theory based on feedback connections of hyper-stable blocks, which may give rise to a physical understanding of dexterous and skilled motions for nonlinear mechanical systems and, eventually lead to the design of intelligent functions implementable in robotic machines.

Keywords

Dexterous motionsPassivityNonlinear circuit theoryHyper-stable blocks'ntelligent robots
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , March 1995 , pp. 111 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References (for Parts I and II)

1.Simon, H., The Shape of Automation for Men and Management (Harper and Row, New York, USA, 1985) p. 96.Google Scholar
2.Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus, S.E., “Making a Mind Versus Modeling the Brain: Artificial Intelligence back at a Branchpoint” In: (Garubard, S.R. ed.) The Artificial Intelligence Debate (MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1989) pp. 15–43.Google Scholar
3.Luh, J.Y.S., Walker, M.W. and Paul, R.P.C., “On-line Computational Scheme for Mechanical Manipulators” Trans, of ASME, J. of Dynamics, Systems, Measurement, and Control 102, 69–76 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hollerbach, J.M., “A Recursive Lagrangian Formulation of Manipulator Dynamics and a Comparative Study of Dynamics Formulation Complexity” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Men, and Cybernetics SMC-10, 730–736 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Freund, E., “Fast Nonlinear Control with Arbitrary Pole-Placement for Industrial Robots and Manupulators” Int. J. Robotics Research 1, 65–78 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Tarn, T.J. et al. , “Nonlinear Feedback in Robot Arm Control” Proc. 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,Las Vegas, Nevada, USA(1984) pp. 736–751.Google Scholar
7.Takegaki, M. and Arimoto, S., “A New Feedback Method for Dynamic Control of Manipulators” Trans, of ASME, J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 103, 119–125 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Arimoto, S. and Miyazaki, F., “Stability and Robustness of PID Feedback Control of Manipulators” In: (Brady, M. and Paul, R.P., eds.) Robotics Research: First International Symposium (MIT Press, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1984) pp. 783–799.Google Scholar
9.Koditschek, D.E., “Natural Motion of Robot Arms” Proc. 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,Lsa Vegas, Nevada, USA(1984) pp. 733–735.Google Scholar
10.Arimoto, S., Naniwa, T. and Suzuki, H., “Asymptotic Stability and Robustness of PID Local Feedback for Position Control of Robot Manipulators” Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Automation, Robotics and Computer Vision (ICARCV–90), Singapore, (1990) pp. 382–386.Google Scholar
11.Raibert, W.H. and Craig, J.J., “Hybrid Position/Force Control of Manipulators” Trans. of ASME, J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 103, 126–133 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.McClamroch, N.H. and Wang, D., “Linear Feedback Control of Position and Contact Force for a Nonlinear Constrained Mechanism” Trans, of ASME, J. of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 112, 640–645 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.McClamroch, N.H. and Wang, D., “Feedback Stabilization and Tracking of Constrained Manipulators” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control AC-23, 419–426 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Slotine, J.J. and Li, W., “On the Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators” Int. J. Robotics Research 6, 49–59 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Arimoto, S., Kawamura, S. and Miyazaki, F., “Bettering Operation of Robots by Learning” J. Robotics Research 1, 123–140 (1984).Google Scholar
16.Arimoto, S., “Learning Control Theory for Robotic Motion” Int. J. of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 4, 543–564 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Arimoto, S., “Passivity and Learnability for Mechanical Systems—A Learning Control Theory for Skill Refinement” IE1CE Trans. Fundamentals E75-A, No.5, 552–560 (1992).Google Scholar
18.Arimoto, S., Naniwa, T., Parra-Vega, V. and Whitcomb, L.L., “Learnability and Adaptability in Robot Dynamics” Proc. of 1993 lEEE/Nagoya Univ. WWW on Learning and Adaptive Systems, Nagoya, Japan (1993) pp. 69–76.Google Scholar
19.Arimoto, S. and Naniwa, T., “A Quasi-Natural Potential that Gives Rise to Learnability and Adaptability in Robotic Systems” (Submitted to J. System Engineering, 1994).Google Scholar
20.Arimoto, S., Naniwa, T., Parra-Vega, V. and Whitcomb, L.L., “A Quasi-natural Potential and Its Role in Design of Hyper-stable PID Servo-loop for Robotic Systems” Proc. of the CAI Pacific Symposium '94 on Control and Industrial Automation Applications, Hong Kong, March 16–17 1994 (1994) pp. 110–117.Google Scholar
21.Arimoto, S., “A Class of Quasi-natural Potentials and Hyper-stable PID Servo-loops for Nonlinear Robotic Systems” Trans. SICE, 30, 1005–1012 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Wang, D. and McClamroch, N.H., “Position and Force Control for Constrained Manipulator Motion: Lyapunov's Direct Approach” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automaton, 9, 308–313 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Arimoto, S., Liu, Y.H. and Naniwa, T., “Principle of Orthogonalization for Hybrid Control of Robot Arms” Proc. of the IFAC 1993 World Congess, Sydney, Australia, (1993) pp. 507–512 (vol. 1).Google Scholar
24.Sadegh, N. and Horowitz, R., “Stability and Robustness of Adaptive Controllers for Robotic Manipulators” Int. J: Robotics Research, 9, 74–92 (1990).Google Scholar
25.Withcomb, L.L., Rizzi, A.A. and koditschek, D.E., “Comparative Experiments with a New Adaptive Controller for Robot ARms” IEEE Trans, on Robotics and Automation, 9, 59–70 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Naniwa, T., Arimoto, S. and Whitcomb, L.L., “Learning Control for Robot Tasks under Geometric Constraints” Proc. of the 1994 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation,San Diego,May 8–13, 1994 (1994), pp. 2921–2927.Google Scholar
27.Arimoto, S. and Naniwa, T., “Quasi-natural Potential, Passivity, and Learnability in Robot Dynamics” (to be published in the 1st ASCC (Asian Control Conference),Tokyo, Japan,July 27–30, 1994).Google Scholar
28.Arimoto, S., Naniwa, T. and Liu, Y.H., “Model-based Adaptive Hybrid Control for Manipulators with Geometric Endpoint Constraint” (Submitted to advanced Robotics, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Whitcomp, L.L., Arimoto, S., Naniwa, T. and Ozaki, F., “An Experimental Environment for Adaptive Robot Force Control” Preprints of the 3rd Int. Symp. on Experimental Robotics, Kyoto, Japan, (10. 28–30, 1994) pp. 270–275.Google Scholar
30.Arimoto, S., “Joint-space Orthogonalization and Passivity for Physical Interpretations of Dexterous Robot Motions under Geometrical Constraints” (Submitted to Int. J. of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Berghuis, H. and Nijmeier, H., “Global Regulations of Robots Using only Position Measurements” Systems and Control Letter, 21, 289–293 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Kelly, R., “A Simple Set-point Robot Controller by Using Only Position Measurements” Proc. of the 1993 IFAC World Congress, (1993) Vol. 6, pp. 173–176.Google Scholar
33.Burkov, J.V., “Asymptotic Stabilization of Nonlinear Lagrangian Systems without Measuring Velocities” Proc. of the Int. Symp. on Active Control in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 2, Lyon, France, (1993) pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
34.Arimoto, S. and Naniwa, T., “A Class of Linear Velocity Observers for Nonlinear Mechanical Systems” (to be published in Proc. of Asian Control Conferenc,Tokyo, Japan,1994).Google Scholar
35.Arimoto, S., “Learning for Skill Aquisition and Refinement: Toward Exploring Everyday Physics” Proc. of 1992 Americal Control Conference,Chicago, Illinosi, USA,(1992) pp. 1306–1307.Google Scholar
36.Arimoto, S., “State-of-the Art and Future Research Directions of Robot Control” (presented at the IFAC Symp. on Robot Control,Capri, Itay,Sept. 19–21, 1994).Google Scholar