Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T13:53:53.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grasp compliance achieved with a planar hand composed of multiple 3-joint fingers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2022

Shuguang Huang Open the ORCID record for Shuguang Huang [Opens in a new window]  and
Joseph M. Schimmels
Shuguang Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Joseph M. Schimmels
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: huangs@marquette.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, the realization of any specified planar Cartesian compliance for an object grasped by a compliant hand is addressed. The hands considered have 2 or more fingers for which each has 3 modulated elastic joints and predetermined link lengths. Geometric construction-based compliance synthesis procedures are developed. Using these procedures, a large set of compliant behaviors can be realized by a single hand simply by adjusting the configuration of each finger and by adjusting the joint stiffness (using variable stiffness actuation) of each finger joint.

Keywords

compliance realizationrobotic handsgrasp compliance
Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , February 2023 , pp. 587 - 608
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Whitney, D. E., “Quasi-static assembly of compliantly supported rigid parts,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 104(1), 65–77 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmels, J. M. and Peshkin, M. A., “Admittance matrix design for force guided assembly,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 8(2), 213–227 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, R. V., Sugar, T. G., Vanderborght, B., Hollander, K. W. and Lefeber, D., “Compliant actuator designs: Review of actuators with passive adjustable compliance/controllable stiffness for robotic applications,” IEEE Robot. Automat. Mag. 16(3), 81–94 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “The bounds and realization of spatial stiffnesses achieved with simple springs connected in parallel,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 14(3), 466–475 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. G., “Minimal realization of a spatial stiffness matrix with simple springs connected in parallel,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15(5), 953–958 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, K., Jiang, S. and Li, Z., “Spatial stiffness realization with parallel springs using geometric parameters,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 18(3), 264–284 (2002).Google Scholar
Hong, M. B. and Choi, Y. J., “Screw system approach to physical realization of stiffness matrix with arbitrary rank,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 1(2), 0210071–8 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simaan, N. and Shoham, M., “Stiffness synthesis of a variable geometry six-degrees-of-freedom double planar parallel robot,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 22(9), 757–775 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, K., Shin, C., Seo, T. and Lee, J., “Stiffness synthesis of 3-DOF planar 3RPR parallel mechanisms,” Robotica 34(12), 2776–2787 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, J., Li, S., Su, H. and Culpepper, M. L., “Screw theory based methodology for the deterministic type synthesis of flexure mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 3(3), 0310081–14 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, Y., Li, T., Ji, W., Jiang, Y. and Li, F., “Compliance modeling of planar flexure-based mechanisms and its application to micro-motion stages,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 13(4), 1–11 (2016).Google Scholar
Krishnan, G., Kim, C. and Kota, S., “A metric to evaluate and synthesize distributed compliant mechanisms,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 135(1), 0110041–9 (2013).Google Scholar
Kirmse, S., Campanile, L. F. and Hasse, A., “Synthesis of compliant mechanisms with selective compliance – An advanced procedure,” Mech. Mach. Theory 157(2), 104184 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Geometric construction-based realization of planar elastic behaviors with parallel and serial manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 9(5), 051006(1–10) (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Geometric approach to the realization of planar elastic behaviors with mechanisms having four elastic components,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 10(4), 041004(1–13) (2018).Google Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Geometry based synthesis of planar compliances with redundant mechanisms having five compliant components,” Mech. Mach. Theory 134(1), 645–666 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Synthesis of planar compliances with mechanisms having six compliant components: geometric approach,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 12(3), 031013(1–13) (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Geometric construction-based realization of spatial elastic behaviors in parallel and serial manipulators,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 34(3), 764–780 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, K., Dong, H., Qiu, C., Chen, I. and Dai, J., “Repelling-screw-based geometrical interpretation of dualities of compliant mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 169(104636), (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Planar compliance realization with two 3-joint serial manipulators connected in parallel,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 14(5), 051007(1–12) (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, J. K., “Active Stiffness Control of Manipulator in Cartesian Coordinates,” In: IEEE 19th Conference of Decision and Control, Albuquerque, NM, USA (December 1980) pp. 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutkosky, M. R. and Kao, I., “Computing and controlling the compliance of a robotic hand,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 5(2), 617–622 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H. R., Chung, W. K. and Youm, Y., “Stiffness analysis and control of multi-fingered robot hands,” ASME J. Dynam. Syst. Meas. Control 117(3), 435–439 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimoga, K. B., “Robot grasp synthesis algorithms: A survey,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 15(3), 230–266 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kao, I. and Ngo, C., “Properties of the grasp stiffness matrix and conservative control strategies,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 18(2), 159–167 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimoga, K. and Goldenberg, A., “Constructing Multifingered Grasps to Achieve Admittance Center,” In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nice, France (May 1992) pp. 2296–2301.Google Scholar
Kim, B., Yi, B., Oh, S. and Suh, I., “Independent finger and independent joint-based compliance control of multifingered robot hands,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 19(2), 185–199 (2003).Google Scholar
Bimbo, J., Turco, E., Ardakani, M. G., Pozzi, M., Salvietti, G., Bo, V., Malvezzi, M. and Prattichizzo, D., “Exploiting robot hand compliance and environmental constraints for edge grasps,” Front. Robot. AI 6, 1–13 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Planar compliance realized with a hand composed of multiple 2-joint fingers,” Mech. Mach. Theory 173(3), 104847 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y., Zou, Z., Wei, G., Ren, L. and Qian, Z., “Subject-specific finite element modelling of the human hand complex: Muscle-driven simulations and experimental validation,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. 48(4), 1181–1195 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, Y., Zou, Z., Qian, Z., Ren, L. and Wei, G., “Biomechanical analysis of the effect of the finger extensor mechanism on hand grasping performance,” IEEE Trans. Neur. Syst. Rehab. 30, 360–368 (2022).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Achieving an arbitrary spatial stiffness with springs connected in parallel,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 120(4), 520–526 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “The duality in spatial stiffness and compliance as realized in parallel and serial elastic mechanisms,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 124(1), 76–84 (2002).Google Scholar
Huang, S. and Schimmels, J. M., “Realization of point planar elastic behaviors using revolute joint serial mechanisms having specified link lengths,” Mech. Mach. Theory 103(3), 1–20 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, S. C., Optimal Admittance Characteristics for Force-Assembly of Convex Planar Polygonal Parts, Master’s thesis (Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2007).Google Scholar