Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:15:32.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Mathematical Model Including Mechanical Structure, Hydraulic and Control of LHDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Guoliang Ma
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China, E-mails: mgl@stumail.ysu.edu.cn, zwhan@jlu.edu.cn
Kaixian Ba*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjing, China
Zhiwu Han
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, China, E-mails: mgl@stumail.ysu.edu.cn, zwhan@jlu.edu.cn
Zhengguo Jin
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China, E-mails: jzg@stumail.ysu.edu.cn, yb@ysu.edu.cn, xdkong@ysu.edu.cn
Bin Yu
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China, E-mails: jzg@stumail.ysu.edu.cn, yb@ysu.edu.cn, xdkong@ysu.edu.cn
Xiangdong Kong
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China, E-mails: jzg@stumail.ysu.edu.cn, yb@ysu.edu.cn, xdkong@ysu.edu.cn
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: bkx@ysu.edu.cn

Summary

In this paper, mathematical models of kinematics, statics and inverse dynamics are derived firstly according to the mechanical structure of leg hydraulic drive system (LHDS). Then, all the above models are integrated with MATLAB/Simulink to build the LHDS simulation model, the model not only considers influence of leg dynamic characteristics on hydraulic system but also takes into account nonlinearity, variable load characteristics and other common problems brought by hydraulic system, and solves compatibility and operation time which brought by using multiple software simultaneously. The experimental results show the simulation model built in this paper can accurately express characteristics of the system.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Tavakoli, M., Lourenço, J., Viegas, C., Neto, P. and Almeida, A.T., “The hybrid Omni Climber robot: Wheel based climbing, arm based plane transition, and switchable magnet adhesion”, Mechatronics 36, 136146 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L. and Qiu, Y., “Design and analysis of small fixed Pedrail robot with the variable guide wheel angle”, J. Mech. Trans. 39(8), 97110 (2015).Google Scholar
Pan, S., Shi, L. and Guo, S., “A Kinect-based real-time compressive tracking prototype system for amphibious spherical robots”, Sensors 15(4), 82328252 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ba, K.X., Song, Y.H., Yu, B., He, X.L., Huang, Z.P., Li, C.H. and Kong, X.D., “Dynamics Compensation of Impedance Based Motion Control for LHDS of Legged Robot”, Robot Auton Syst, Doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2020.103704 to be published.Google Scholar
Janne, K. and Mattila, J., “Stability-guaranteed impedance control of hydraulic robotic manipulators”, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mech. 22(2), 601612 (2017).Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Li, Y., Lee, T.H. and Ge, S.S., “Neural networks impedance control of robots interacting with environments”, IET Control Theory A. 7(11), 15091519 (2013).Google Scholar
Ba, K.X., Ma, G.L., Yu, B., Jin, Z.G., Huang, Z.P., Zhang, J.X. and Kong, X.D., “A nonlinear model-based variable impedance parameters control for position-based impedance control system of hydraulic drive unit”, Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 18(7), 337344 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Dakka, F.J., Rozo, L. and Caldwell, D.G., “Force-based variable impedance learning for robotic manipulation”, Robot. Auton. Syst. 109, 156167 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, W.B., Guan, R.H., Yuan, L.T. and Gu, X.L., “Adaptive Impedance Based Force and Position Control for Pneumatic Compliant System”, 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M. and Hirche, S., “Invariance control for safe human–robot interaction in dynamic environments”, IEEE Trans. Robot. 33(6), 116 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, J., Liu, J.M. and Chen, W.H., “An impedance-based force control scheme to a plate-to-plate nanoimprinter”, IEEE Trans. Nanotech. 15(2), 328336 (2016).Google Scholar
Souzanchi-K, M., Arab, A., Akbarzadeh-T, M.R. and Fateh, M.M., “Robust impedance control of uncertain mobile manipulators using time-delay compensation”, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Tech. 26(6), 1942–1953 (2017).Google Scholar
Fateh, M.M. and Babaghasabha, R., “Impedance control of robots using voltage control strategy”, Nonlinear Dyn. 74(1), 277286 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Wang, J. and Li, D., “Fractional-Order Impedance Control for a Wheel-Legged Robot”, 2017 29th Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC), Chongqing, China, 28–30 May 2017, pp. 78457850.Google Scholar
Fateh, M.M. and Khoshdel, V., “Voltage-based adaptive impedance force control for a lower-limb rehabilitation robot”, Adv. Robot. 26(15), 961971 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H., Fukuoka, Y. and Cohen, A.H., “Adaptive dynamic walking of a quadruped robot on natural ground based on biological concepts”, Int. J. Robot. Res. 22(5), 187202 (2003).Google Scholar
Poulakakis, I., Smith, J.A. and Buehler, M., “Modeling and experiments of untethered quadrupedal running with a bounding gait: The scout II robot”, Int. J. Robot. Res. 24(4), 239256 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichol, J.G., Singh, S.P.N., Waldron, K.J. and Palmer, L., “System design of a quadrupedal galloping machine”, Int. J. Robot. Res. 23(10), 10131027 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seok, S., Wang, A., Chuah, M.Y., Otten, D., Lang, J. and Kim, S., “Design Principles for Highly Efficient Quadrupeds and Implementation on the MIT Cheetah Robot”, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, 6–10 May 2013, pp. 33073312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playter, R., Buehler, M. and Raibert, M., “BigDog”, In: Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers, Orlando, FL, USA, vol. 6230 (2006).Google Scholar
Semini, C., Barasuol, V., Boaventura, T., Frigerio, M., Focchi, M., Caldwell, D. and Buchli, J., “Towards versatile legged robots through active impedance control”, Int. J. Robot. Res. 34(7), 10031020 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rong, X., Li, Y., Ruan, J. and Li, B. ., “Design and simulation for a hydraulic actuated quadruped robot,” J. Mech. Sci. Tech. 26(4), 11711177 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focchi, M., Barasuol, V., Havoutis, I., Buchli, J., Semini, C. and Caldwell, D., “Local Reflex Generation for Obstacle Negotiation in Quadrupedal Locomotion,Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots (CLAWAR), Sydney, Australia, 14–17 July 2013, pp. 443450.Google Scholar
Hutter, M., Gehring, C., Bloesch, M., Hoepflinger, M.H. and Siegwart, R., “Starleth: A Compliant Quadrupedal Robot For Fast, Efficient, and Versatile Locomotion,” 15th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, Baltimore, MD, 23–26 July 2012, pp. 483490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajracharya, M., Ma, J., Malchano, M., Perkins, A. and Matthies, L., “High Fidelity Day/Night Stereo Mapping with Vegetation and Negative Obstacle Detection for Vision-in-the-Loop Walking,IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Tokyo, Japan, 03–08 November 2013, pp. 36633670.Google Scholar
Jin, T.K., Cho, J.S., Park, B.Y., Park, S. and Lee, Y., “Experimental Investigation on the Design of Leg for a Hydraulic Actuated Quadruped Robot,IEEE ISR 2013, Seoul, South Korea, 24–26 October 2013, pp. 15.Google Scholar
Wiedebach, G., Bertrand, S., Wu, T., Fiorio, L., Mccrory, S., Griffin, R., Nori, F. and Pratt, J., “Walking on Partial Footholds Including Line Contacts with the Humanoid Robot Atlas,” 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), Cancun, Mexico, 15–17 November 2016, pp. 13121319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, G., Gu, J. and Xie, W., “Virtual entity-based rapid prototype for design and simulation of humanoid robots,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 10(291), 19 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, X.B. and Song, Q., “Research on modeling and simulation techniques of electromechanical integration based on virtual prototype,” Agro Food Ind. Hi-tech 28, 23032306 (2017).Google Scholar
Bi, L., Guo, J. and Guo, S., “Virtual Prototyping Technology-Based Dynamics Analysis for an Amphibious Spherical Robot,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation, Lijiang, China, 8–10 August 2015, pp. 25632568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S. and Zi, B., “Design and Analysis of a 2-DOF Hybrid-Driven Planar Parallel Manipulator Based on Virtual Prototype Technology,” 2010 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing Systems, Dalian, China, 5–7 July 2010, pp. 502506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, L.F.P.D. and Flávio, L.R., “Modeling, simulation and analysis of locomotion patterns for hexapod robots,” IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 16(2), 375383 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, C.A.G., Reséndiz, J.R., Santibáñez, J.D.M. and Bobadilla, G.M., “A model and simulation of a five-degree-of freedom robotic arm for mechatronic courses,” IEEE Latin Am. Trans. 12(2), 7886 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, B., Han, L., Wang, Y., Huang, S. and Liu, L.L., “Kinematics analysis and numerical simulation of a manipulator based on virtual prototyping,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 71(5), 943963 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, H.L., Li, F., Weng, N. and Sheng, Z.Q., “Virtual prototype modeling of biped robot with heterogeneous legs,” Appl. Mech. Mater. 307, 117120 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Z., Yan, Z. and Xu, J.J., “Study of co-simulation of rehabilitation robot for upper limb based on virtual prototype,” Adv. Mater. Res. 712(3), 22722276 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar