Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:58:46.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new approach to determine the maximal singularity-free zone of 3-RPR planar parallel manipulator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2011

G. Abbasnejad ,
H. M. Daniali  and
S. M. Kazemi
G. Abbasnejad
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Babol University of Technology, P.O. Box 484, Babol, Iran
H. M. Daniali*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Babol University of Technology, P.O. Box 484, Babol, Iran
S. M. Kazemi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Babol University of Technology, P.O. Box 484, Babol, Iran
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: mohammadi@nit.ac.ir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper presents a new algorithm to find the singularity-free cylindrical workspace of parallel manipulators. Because of the limited workspace of parallel manipulators cluttered with different types of singularities, a simple and robust technique to determine continuous singularity-free zones in the workspace of parallel manipulators is required. Here, the largest singularity-free cylinder within the workspace for any prescribed orientation ranging around a reference orientation angle of moving platform is determined. To this end, Particle Swarm Optimization is utilized to find the closest point on the singularity surface to the axis of the cylinder. By implementing the algorithm on 3-RPR planar parallel manipulator, the results show that this algorithm improves the efficiency and leads to significantly larger singularity-free workspace than those reported earlier.

Keywords

Parallel manipulatorWorkspaceSingularity-freeOptimizationPSO
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , October 2012 , pp. 1005 - 1012
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Merlet, J. P., “Trajectory verification in the workspace for parallel manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 13 (4), 326–333 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bhattacharya, S., Hatwal, H. and Ghosh, A., “Comparison of an exact and an approximate method of singularity avoidance in platform-type parallel manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 33, 965–974 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ambike, S. and Schmiedeler, J. P., “A methodology for implementing the curative theory approach to path tracking with planar robots,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43, 1225–1235 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dash, A. K., Chen, I. M., Yeo, S. H. and Yang, G., “Singularity-Free Path Planning of Parallel Manipulators using Clustering Algorithm and Line Geometry,” In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2003), Taipei, Taiwan (Sep. 2003) pp. 14–19.Google Scholar
5.Seyyedi, S.Parsa, H. M.Daniali, and Ghaderi, R., “Optimization of parallel manipulator trajectory for obstacle and singularity avoidances based on neural network,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 51 (5–8), 811–816 (2010). DOI:10.1007/s00170-010-2644-0Google Scholar
6.Li, H., Gosselin, C. M. and Richard, M. J., “Determination of maximal singularity-free zones in the workspace of planar three-degree-of-freedom parallel mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 41, 1157–1167 (2006).Google Scholar
7.Arsenault, M. and Boudreau, R., “The synthesis of three-degree-of-freedom planar parallel mechanisms with revolute joints (3-RRR) for an optimal singularity-free workspace,” J. Robot. Syst. 21 (5), 259–274 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Yang, Y. and O'Brien, J. F., “A sequential method for the singularity-free workspace design of a three-legged parallel robot,” Mech. Mach. Theory 45, 1694–1706 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Arakelian, V., Briot, S. and Glazunov, V., “Increase of singularity-free zones in the workspace of parallel manipulators using mechanisms of variable structure,” Mech. Mach. Theory 43 (9), 1129–1140 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Li, H., Gosselin, C. M. and Richard, M. J. “Determination of the maximal singularity-free zones in the six-dimensional workspace of the general Gough–Stewart platform,” Mech. Mach. Theory 42, 497–511 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Masouleh, M. T. and Gosselin, C., “Determination of singularity-free zones in the workspace of planar 3-PRR parallel mechanisms,” J. Mech. Des. (ASME) 129, 649–652 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jiang, Q. and Gosselin, C. M., “The maximal singularity-free workspace of the Gough–Stewart platform for a given orientation,” J. Mech. Des. (ASME) 130, 112304–112308 (2008).Google Scholar
13.Jiang, Q. and Gosselin, C. M., “Determination of the maximal singularity-free orientation workspace for the Gough–Stewart platform,” Mech. Mach. Theory 44, 1281–1293 (2009).Google Scholar
14.Jiang, Q. and Gosselin, C. M., “Geometric synthesis of planar 3-RPR parallel mechanisms for singularity-free workspace”, Tran. CSME 33 (4), 667–678 (2010).Google Scholar
15.Collins, C. L., Mccarthy, J. M., “The quartic singularity surfaces of planar platforms in the Clifford algebra of the projective plane,” Mech. Mach. Theory 33 (7), 931–944 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Gosselin, C. and Angeles, J., “The optimum kinematic design of a planar three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator,” J. Mech. Transm. Autom. Des. 110, 35–41 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Mohammadi Daniali, H. R., Zsombor-Murray, P. J. and Angeles, J., “Singularity analysis of planar parallel manipulators,” Mech. Mach. Theory 30 (5), 665–678 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Gosselin, C. and Angeles, J., “Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 6 (3), 281–290 (1990).Google Scholar
19.Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R., “Particle Swarm Optimization,” In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ, vol. IV (1995) pp. 1942–1948.Google Scholar
20.Xu, Q. and Li, Y., “Kinematic analysis and optimization of a new compliant parallel micromanipulator,” Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 3 (4), 351–358 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Li, Y. and Xu, Q., “Design and optimization of an XYZ parallel micromanipulator with flexure hinges,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 55, 377–402 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Abbasnejad, G., Daniali, H. M. and Fathi, A., “Architecture optimization of 4PUS+1PS parallel manipulator,” Robotica 29 (5), 683–690 (2011). doi:10.1017/S0263574710000500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Shi, Y. H. and Eberhart, R. C., “Parameter Selection in Particle Swarm Optimization,” In: Evolutionary Programming VII, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 1447 (1998) 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Perez, R. E. and Behdinan, K., “Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization,” Comput. Struct. 85, 1579–1588 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar