Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:35:48.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A predictor-based attitude and position estimation for rigid bodies moving in planar space by using delayed landmark measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2016

Danial Senejohnny  and
Mehrzad Namvar
Danial Senejohnny
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11155-8639, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: d.senejohnny@gmail.com
Mehrzad Namvar*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11155-8639, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: d.senejohnny@gmail.com
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: namvar@sharif.ir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper proposes a globally and exponentially convergent predictive observer for attitude and position estimation based on landmark measurements and velocity (angular and linear) readings. It is assumed that landmark measurements are available with time-delay. The maximum value of the sensor delay under which the estimation error converges to zero is calculated. Synthesis of the observer is based on a representation of rigid-body kinematics and sensor delay, formulated via ordinary and partial differential equations (ODE-PDE). Observability condition specifies necessary and sufficient landmark configuration for convergence of attitude and position estimation error to zero. Finally, for implementation purposes, a PDE-free realization of the predictive observer is proposed. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate performance and convergence properties of the predictive observer in case of a wheeled mobile robot.

Keywords

Attitude estimationTime delayLandmarkSatellitePredictor observer
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , June 2017 , pp. 1415 - 1430
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aghili, F., Kuryllo, M., Okouneva, G. and English, C., “Fault-tolerant position/attitude estimation of free-floating space objects using a laser range sensor,” Sensors J. IEEE 11 (1), 176–185 (2011).Google Scholar
2. Alexis, K., Nikolakopoulos, G. and Tzes, A., “Model predictive quadrotor control: attitude, altitude and position experimental studies,” Control Theory Appl. IET 6 (12), 1812–1827 (2012).Google Scholar
3. Cunha, R., Silvestre, C. and Hespanha, J., “Output-feedback control for stabilization on SE(3),” Syst. Control Lett. 57 (12), 1013–1022 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Vasconcelos, J. F., Cunha, R., Silvestre, C. and Oliveira, P., “A nonlinear position and attitude observer on SE(3) using landmark measurements,” Syst. Control Lett. 59 (3), 155–166 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Sert, H., Kökösy, A. and Perruquetti, W., “A Single Landmark Based Localization Algorithm for Non-Holonomic Mobile Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE (2011) pp. 293–298.Google Scholar
6. Angelino, C. V., Baraniello, V. R. and Cicala, L., “UAV Position and Attitude Estimation using IMU, GNSS and Camera,” Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), IEEE (2012) pp. 735–742.Google Scholar
7. Jung, D. and Tsiotras, P., “Inertial attitude and position reference system development for a small UAV,” AIAA Infotech Aerospace conference, 7–10 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kingston, D. B. and Beard, R. W., “Real-time attitude and position estimation for small UAVs using low-cost sensors,” Proceedings of the AIAA 3rd Unmanned Unlimited Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit. (2004) pp. 2004–6488.Google Scholar
9. Bourgeois, F., Kneip, L., Weiss, S. and Siegwart, R., “Delay and Dropout Tolerant State Estimation for MAVs,” Experimental Robotics (Springer, 2014) pp. 571–584.Google Scholar
10. Crassidis, J. L., Markley, F. L. and Cheng, Y., “Survey of nonlinear attitude estimation methods,” J. Guid. Control Dyn. 30 (1), 12–28 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Khosravian, A. and Namvar, M., “Rigid body attitude control using a single vector measurement and gyro,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 57 (5), 1273–1279 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lageman, C., Trumpf, J. and Mahony, R., “Gradient-like observers for invariant dynamics on a lie group,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 55 (2), 367–377 (2010).Google Scholar
13. Angeli, D., “An almost global notion of input-to-state stability,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49 (6), 866–874 (2004).Google Scholar
14. Krstic, M., Delay Compensation for Nonlinear, Adaptive, and PDE Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Chen, C.-T., Linear System Theory and Design (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
16. Hammouri, H. and Nadri, M., “An observer design for a class of implicit systems,” Syst. Control Lett. 62 (3), 256–261 (2013).Google Scholar
17. Loría, A., Panteley, E. and Zavala-Río, A., “Adaptive observers with persistency of excitation for synchronization of chaotic systems,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regular Papers 56 (12), 2703–2716 (2009).Google Scholar
18. Khalil, H., Nonlinear Systems (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002).Google Scholar
19. Chapeau-Blondeau, F. and Monir, A., “Numerical evaluation of the lambert W function and application to generation of generalized Gaussian noise with exponent 1/2,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 50 (9), 2160–2165 (2002).Google Scholar