Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:43:36.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A reconfigurable tri-prism mobile robot with eight modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Jieyu Wang ,
Yan'an Yao  and
Xianwen Kong
Jieyu Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK. E-mail: x.kong@hw.ac.uk
Yan'an Yao*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, P.R. China
Xianwen Kong
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK. E-mail: x.kong@hw.ac.uk
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jw26@hw.ac.uk
**Corresponding author. E-mail: yayao@bjtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A novel reconfigurable tri-prism mobile robot with eight modes is proposed. The robot is composed of two feet connected by three U-R-U (universal-revolute-universal) limbs. The robot incorporates the kinematic properties of sphere robots, squirming robots, tracked robots, wheeled robots and biped robots. In addition, the somersaulting and turning modes are also explored. After the description of the robot, the DOF (degree-of-freedom) is calculated based on screw theory. The 3D model and simulations indicate that the robot can cross several typical obstacles and can also be folded via two approaches. Finally, the prototype experiments are presented to verify the feasibility of the proposed mobile robot in different motion mode.

Keywords

Mobile robotReconfigurable robotObstacle crossingFoldable robotScrew theory
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 36 , Issue 10 , October 2018 , pp. 1454 - 1476
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Machado, J. A. T. and Silva, M. F., “An Overview of Legged Robots,” Proceedings of International Symposium on Mathematical Methods in Engineering, Ankara, Turquia, MME Press (2006).Google Scholar
2. Cobano, J. A., Estremera, J. and Santos, P. G., “Location of legged robots in outdoor environments,” Robot. Auton. Syst. 56 (9), 751–761 (2008).Google Scholar
3. Raibert, M., Blankespoor, K., Nelson, G. and Playter, R., “Bigdog, the rough-terrain quaduped robot,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 41(2), (2008), pp. 10822–10825.Google Scholar
4. Halme, A., Schonberg, T. and Wang, Y., “Motion Control of a Spherical Mobile Robot,” Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Mie, Japan, vol. 1 (1996) pp. 259–264.Google Scholar
5. Armou, R. H. and Vincent, J. F. V., “Rolling in nature and robotics: A review,” J. Bionic Eng. 3 (4), 195–208 (2006).Google Scholar
6. Das, T. and Mukherjee, R., “Exponential stabilization of the rolling sphere,” Automatica 40 (11), 1877–1889 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Campion, G., Bastin, G. and Dandrea-Novel, B., “Structural Properties and Classification of Kinematic and Dynamic Models of Wheeled Mobile Robots,” IEEE transactions on robotics and automation, 12(1), (1996), pp. 47–62.Google Scholar
8. Hirose, S., Biologically Inspired Robots (Snake-like Locomotor and Manipulator), (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
9. Togawa, K., Mori, M. and Hirose, S., “Study on Three-Dimensional Active Cord Mechanism Development of ACM-R2,” Proceedings of the IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IROS2000, vol. 3 (2000) pp. 2242–2247.Google Scholar
10. Maeda, S., Hara, Y., Yoshida, R. and Hashimoto, S., “Chemical Robot-Design of Self-walking Gel,” Proceedings of the IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2007) pp. 2150–2155.Google Scholar
11. Zhu, J., Sun, D. and Tso, S., “Development of a tracked climbing robot,” J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 35 (4), 427–443 (2002).Google Scholar
12. Volpe, R., Balaram, J., Ohm, T. and Ivlev, R., “The Rocky 7 Mars Rover Prototype,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Osaka, Japan, vol. 3 (1996) pp. 1558–1564.Google Scholar
13. Kim, Y. G., Kwak, J. H. and Hong, D. H., “Autonomous terrain adaptation and user-friendly teleoperation of wheel-track hybrid mobile robot,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 13 (10), 1781–1788 (2012).Google Scholar
14. Yamauchi, B., “PackBot: A Versatile Platform for Military Robotics,” Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VI, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2004) pp. 228–237.Google Scholar
15. Guarnieri, M., Takao, I., Fukushima, E. F. and Hirose, S., “HELIOS VIII Search and Rescue Robot: Design of an Adaptive Gripper and System Improvements,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2007) 1775–1780.Google Scholar
16. Guarnieri, M. and Debenest, P., “Helios 7,” J. Robot. Mechatron. 141, 171–177 (2003).Google Scholar
17. Guarnieri, M., Debenest, P., Inoh, T., Fukushima, E. and Hirose, S., “Helios VII: A new vehicle for disaster response, mechanical design and basic experiments,” Adv. Rot., 19 (8), 901–927 (2005).Google Scholar
18. Halme, A., Suomela, J., Schönberg, T. and Wang, Y., “A Spherical Mobile Micro-Robot for Scientific Applications,” Proceedings of ASTRA, (1996).Google Scholar
19. Michaud, F., Létourneau, D., Arsenault, M., Bergeron, Y. and Cadrin, R., “Multi-modal locomotion robotic platform using leg-track-wheel articulations,” Auton. Robot. 18 (2), 137–156 (2005).Google Scholar
20. Lewis, P. J., Flann, N., Torrie, M. R., Poulson, E. A., Petroff, T. and Witus, G., “Chaos: An intelligent ultra-mobile SUGV: Combining the mobility of wheels, tracks, and legs,” Proc. SPIE 5804, 427–438 (2005).Google Scholar
21. Yim, M., Shen, W., Salemi, B., Rus, D., Moll, M., Lipson, H., Klavins, E. and Chirikjian, G., “Modular Self-reconfigurable robot systems,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 14 (1), 43–52 (2007).Google Scholar
22. Pamecha, A., Chiang, C., Stein, D. and Chirikjian, G., “Design and Implementation of Metamorphic Robots,” Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference & Computers in Engineering Conference (1996).Google Scholar
23. Liu, C. H., Yao, Y. A., Li, R. M., Tian, Y. B., Zhang, N., Ji, Y. Y. and Kong, F. Z., “Rolling 4R linkages,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 48, 1–14 (2012).Google Scholar
24. Miao, Z. H., Yao, Y. A. and Tian, Y. B., “A type of novel usage of 4U parallelogram mechanisms-designed as a whole to be biped walking mechanism,” Robot, 33 (4), 394–404 (2011).Google Scholar
25. Miao, Z. H. and Yao, Y. A., “A rolling 6U parallel mechanism,” Frontiers Mech. Eng. China 6 (1), 96–98 (2011).Google Scholar
26. Hirose, S., Homma, K., Matsuzawa, S. and Hayakawa, S., “Parallel Link Walking Vehicle and its Basic Experiments,” Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on intelligent Mobile Robots (1992) pp. 7–8.Google Scholar
27. Reg Dunlop, G., Foot Design for a Large Walking Delta Robot. Experimental Robotics VIII, (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg) pp. 602–611 (2003).Google Scholar
28. Zhang, C. J. and Li, Y. W., “A new walking robot based on 3-RPC parallel mechanism,” J. Mech. Eng. 47, 25–30 (2011).Google Scholar
29. Yan, C. and Zhou, Y., “Two-fold symmetrical 6r foldable frame and its bifurcations,” Int. J. Solids Struct. 46 (25), 4504–4514 (2009).Google Scholar
30. Dai, J. S. and Rees, J. J., “Mobility in metamorohic mechanisms of foldable/ erectable kinds,” ASME Trans. J. Mech. Des. 121 (3), 375–382 (1999).Google Scholar
31. Galletti, C. and Fanghella, P., “Single-loop kinematotropic mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 36 (6), 743–761 (2001).Google Scholar
32. Lee, C. C. and Herve, J. M., “Discontinuously Movable 8R Mechanisms with an Infinity of Bifurcations,” Proceedings of 12th IFToMM Word Congress, Besancon, France (2007).Google Scholar
33. Kong, X., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF parallel manipulators with both a planar operation mode and a spatial translational operation mode,” ASME J. Mech. Robot. 5 (4), 041015 (2013).Google Scholar
34. Kong, X. and Huang, C., “Type Synthesis of Single-DOF Single-loop Mechanisms with Two Operation Modes,” Proceedings of ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots (2009) pp. 136–141.Google Scholar
35. Kong, X. and Jin, Y., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF multi-mode translational/spherical parallel mechanisms with lockable joints,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 96 (2), 323–333 (2016).Google Scholar
36. Zhang, K. T., Fang, Y. F. and Fang, H. R., “Design and analysis of a rover mechanism based on metamorphic principle,” J. Beijing Univ. Aeronau. Astronaut. 33 (7), 838–841 (2007).Google Scholar
37. Wang, N., Fang, Y. and Zhang, D., “A spatial single loop kinematotropic mechanism used for biped/wheeled switchable robots,” Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 11 (3), 287–299 (2015).Google Scholar
38. Ding, X. L. and Xu, K., “Design and analysis of a novel metamorphic wheel-legged rover mechanism,” J. Central South Univ. 40 (1) 91–101 (2009).Google Scholar
39. Dai, Z. and Sun, J., “A biomimetic study of discontinuous-constraint metamorphic mechanism for gecko-like robot,” J. Bionic Eng. 4 (2), 91–95 (2007).Google Scholar
40. Tian, Y. B., Yao, Y. A. and Wang, J. Y., “A rolling 8-bar linkage mechanism,” J. Mech. Robot. 7 (4), 041002 (2014).Google Scholar
41. Wang, J., Yao, Y. and Kong, X., “A rolling mechanism with two modes of planar and spherical linkages,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 230 (12), 2110–2123 (2016).Google Scholar
42. Huang, Z., Liu, J. and Zeng, D., “A general methodology for mobility analysis of mechanisms based on constraint screw theory,” Sci. China Series E: Technol. Sci. 52 (5), 1337–1347 (2009).Google Scholar
43. Huang, Z. and Fang, Y. F., “Kinematic characteristics analysis of 3 DOF in-parallel actuated pyramid mechanism,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 31 (8), 1009–1018 (1996).Google Scholar
44. Kong, X. and Gosselin, C. M., Type Synthesis of Parallel Mechanisms, (Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2007).Google Scholar
45. Vukobratovic, M. and Borovac, B., “Zero-moment point-thirty five years of its life,” Int. J. Humanoid Robot. 1 (1), 157–173 (2004).Google Scholar
46. Walter, D. R., Husty, M. L. and Pfurner, M., “A complete kinematic analysis of the SNU 3-UPU parallel robot,” Contemp. Math. 496, 331 (2009).Google Scholar
47. Kong, X., “Reconfiguration analysis of a 3-DOF parallel mechanism using Euler parameter quaternions and algebraic geometry method,” Mech. Mach. Theory, 74, 188–201 (2014).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material

Wang et al. supplementary material 1

Download Wang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material

Wang et al. supplementary material 2

Download Wang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 265.7 KB

Wang et al. supplementary material

Wang et al. supplementary material 3

Download Wang et al. supplementary material(Video)
Video 10 MB