Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:22:54.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stiffness synthesis of 3-DOF planar 3RPR parallel mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Kefei Wen ,
Chan-Bae Shin ,
Tae Won Seo  and
Jeh Won Lee
Kefei Wen
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Republic of Korea
Chan-Bae Shin
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Ulsan College, Ulsan 682-715, Republic of Korea
Tae Won Seo*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Republic of Korea
Jeh Won Lee*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Republic of Korea
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: taewon_seo@yu.ac.kr, jwlee@yu.ac.kr
*Corresponding author. E-mail: taewon_seo@yu.ac.kr, jwlee@yu.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Force control is important in robotics research for safe operation in the interaction between a manipulator and a human operator. The elasticity center is a very important characteristic for controlling the force of a manipulator, because a force acting at the elasticity center results in a pure displacement of the end-effector in the same direction as the force. Similarly, a torque acting at the elasticity center results in a pure rotation of the end-effector in the same direction as the torque. A stiffness synthesis strategy is proposed for a desired elasticity center for three-degree-of-freedom (DOF) planar parallel mechanisms (PPM) consisting of three revolute-prismatic-revolute (3RPR) links. Based on stiffness analysis, the elasticity center is derived to have a diagonal stiffness matrix in an arbitrary configuration. The stiffness synthesis is defined to determine the configuration when the elasticity center and the diagonal matrix are given. The seven nonlinear system equations are solved based on one reference input. The existence and the solvability of the nonlinear system equations were analyzed using reduced Gröbner bases. A numerical example is presented to validate the method.

Keywords

Elasticity centerStiffness synthesisParallel mechanismReduced Gröbner basesScrew theory
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 34 , Issue 12 , December 2016 , pp. 2776 - 2787
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jin, S., Kim, J. and Seo, T., “Optimization of a redundantly actuated 5R symmetrical parallel mechanism based on structural stiffness,” Robotica, Online First Article, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263574714001209 (2014).Google Scholar
2. Choi, J. H., Seo, T. and Lee, J. W., “Torque distribution optimization of redundantly actuated planar parallel mechanisms based on a null-space solution,” Robotica, 32 (7), 1125–1134 (2014).Google Scholar
3. Craig, J. J., Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2005).Google Scholar
4. Paul, R. P., Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981).Google Scholar
5. Ball, R. S., A Treatise on the Theory of Screws (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1900).Google Scholar
6. Dimentberg, F. M., The Screw Calculus and its Applications in Mechanics, Foreign Technology Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (Ohio. Document No. FTD-HT-12-1632-67, Moscow, 1965).Google Scholar
7. Hunt, K. H., Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms (Clarendon Press, Oxford University press, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
8. Duffy, J., Statics and Kinematics with Application to Robotics (Cambridge University Press, New York 1996).Google Scholar
9. Murray, R. M., Li, Z. and Sastry, S. S., A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1994).Google Scholar
10. Lipkin, H., Topic: Elastic modeling, International Summer School: Screw-Theory Based Methods in Robotics (Italy, University of Genoa, 2009).Google Scholar
11. Lipkin, H. and Patterson, T., “Geometrical Properties of Modelled Robot Elasticity: Part I-Decompositon,” ASME Design Technical Conference, Scottsdale, DE-vol. 45 (1992) pp. 179–185.Google Scholar
12. Lipkin, H. and Patterson, T., “Geometrical Properties of Modelled Robot Elasticity: Part II-Center of Elasticity,” ASME Design Technical Conference, Scottsdale, DE-vol. 45 (1992) pp. 187–193.Google Scholar
13. Ciblak, N. and Lipkin, H., “Centers of Stiffness, Complicance, and Elasticity in the Modelling of Robotic Systems,” ASME Design Technical Conference, Minneapolis, DE-vol. 72 (1994) pp. 185–195.Google Scholar
14. Ciblak, N., and Lipkin, H., “Application of Stiffness Decompositions to Synthesis by Springs,” ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA (1998).Google Scholar
15. Ciblak, N. and Lipkin, H., “Synthesis of Cartesian Stiffness for Robotic Applications,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, Michigan (1999).Google Scholar
16. Simaan, N. and Shoham, M., “Stiffness Synthesis of a Variable Geometry Planar Robot,” Advances in Robot Kinematics (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2002) pp. 463–472.Google Scholar
17. Simaan, N. and Shoham, M., “Stiffness synthesis of a variable geometry six-degrees-of-freedom double planar parallel robot,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 22 (9), 757–775 (2003).Google Scholar
18. Buchberger, B., An Algorithm for Finding a Basis for Residue Class Ring of a Zero Dimensional Polynomial Ideals (German) Ph.D. Thesis (University of Innsbruck, Institute for Mathematics, Austria, 1965).Google Scholar
19. Adams, W. W. and Loustaunau, P., An Introduction to Gröbner bases, Graduate studies in mathematics, vol. 3 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, USA, 1994).Google Scholar