Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:05:14.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-mode overconstrained three-DOFs rotational-translational linear-motor-based parallel-kinematics mechanism for machine tool applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2007

Sameh Refaat ,
Jacques M. Hervé ,
Saeid Nahavandi  and
Hieu Trinh
Sameh Refaat
Affiliation:
Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia.
Jacques M. Hervé
Affiliation:
Ecole Centrale Paris, 92295 Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Saeid Nahavandi*
Affiliation:
Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia.
Hieu Trinh
Affiliation:
Intelligent Systems Research Laboratory, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia.
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: nahavand@deakin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The paper introduces a family of three-DOFs translational-rotational Parallel-Kinematics Mechanisms (PKMs) as well as the mobility analysis of such family using Lie-group theory. Each member of this family has two-rotational one-translational DOFs. A novel mechanism is presented and analyzed as a representative of that family. The use and the practical value of that modular mechanism are emphasized.

Keywords

Overconstrained mechanismsSymmetric parallel-kinematics mechanismsRotational-translational mechanismsThree-DOFs PKMsLinear motorHigh-speedHigh-accelerationFive-axis machine-tools
Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , July 2007 , pp. 461 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Callegari, M. and Tarantini, M., “Kinematic analysis of a novel translational platform,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 125 (2), 308–315 (June 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Callegari, M., Marzetti, P. and Olivieri, B., “Kinematics of a Parallel Mechanism for the Generation of Spherical Motions,” In: On Advances in Robot Kinematics (Lenarcic, J. and Galletti, C., eds.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004) pp. 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dunlop, G. R. and Jones, T. P., “Position analysis of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator,” Mech. Mach. Theory 32, 903–920 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hervé, J. M. and Sparacino, F., “Structural Synthesis of Parallel Robots Generating Spatial Translation,” Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advances in Robotics, Pise, Italy (1991), vol. 1, pp. 808–813.Google Scholar
5. Hervé, J. M., “The Lie group of rigid body displacements, a fundamental tool for mechanism design,” Mech. Mach. Theory 34, 719–730 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hervé, J. M., “Parallel Mechanisms with Pseudo-Planar Motion Generators,” In: On Advances in Robot Kinematics (Lenarcic, J. and Galletti, C., eds.) (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004) pp. 431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hui, R., “Mechanisms for Haptic Feedback,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan (1995) pp. 2138–2143.Google Scholar
8. Huang, Z. and Li, Q. C., “General methodology for type synthesis of symmetrical lower-mobility parallel manipulators and several novel manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 21 (2), 131–146 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Huang, Z. and Li, Q. C., “Type synthesis of symmetrical lower mobility parallel mechanisms using the constraint-synthesis method,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 22 (1), 59–82 (2003).Google Scholar
10. Hunt, K. H., Kinematic Geometry of Mechanisms (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
11. Hunt, K. H., “Structural kinematics of in-parallel-actuated robot arms,” ASME J. Mech., Transm. Autom. Des. 105, 705–712 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Huynh, P. and Hervé, J. M., “Equivalent kinematic chains of 3-dof tripod mechanisms with planar spherical bonds,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 127, 95–102 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Karouia, M. and Hervé, J. M., “A Three-DOF Tripod for Generating Spherical Rotation,” In: Advances in Robot Kinematics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000) pp. 395–402).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Karouia, M. and Hervé, J. M., “An Orientational 3-DOF Parallel Mechanism,” Proceedings of the 3rd Chemnitz Parallel Kinematics Seminar(2002) pp. 139–150.Google Scholar
15. Karouia, M. and Hervé, J. M., “A Family of Novel Orientational 3-DOF Parallel Robots,” Proc. RoManSy 14, Udine, Italy (Springer, Heidelberg, 2002) pp. 359–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Karouia, M. and Hervé, J. M., “Asymmetrical 3-dof spherical parallel mechanisms,” Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 24, 47–57 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Karouia, M. and Hervé, J. M., “Non-overconstrained 3-dof spherical parallelmanipulators of type: 3-RCC, 3-CCR, 3-CRC,” Robotica, 41 (1), 85–94 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Kong, X. and Gosselin, C. M., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF spherical parallel manipulators based on screw theory,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 126 (1), 101–108 (January 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Kong, X. and Gosselin, C. M., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF translational parallel manipulators based on screw theory,” ASME J. Mech. Des. 126 (1), 83–92 (January 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Lee, K.-M. and Shah, D. K., “Kinematic analysis of a three-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator,” IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 4 (3), 354–360 (June 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Liu, X.-J., Wang, J. and Pritschow, G., “A new family of spatial 3-dof fully parallel manipulators with high rotational capability,” Mech. Mach. Theory 40, 475–494 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Liu, X.-J., Kim, J. and Wang, J., “Two Novel Parallel Mechanisms With Less than Six DOFs and the Applications,” In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Fundamental Issues and Future Research Directions for Parallel Mechanisms and Manipulators, 172–177 (Gosselin, C. M. and Ebert-Uphoff, I., eds.), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada (October 2002).Google Scholar
23. Merlet, J.-P., “Miniature In-Parallel Positioning System MIPS for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical engineering, Nice, France (1991) pp. 141–147.Google Scholar
24. Merlet, J.-P., Parallel Robots (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Fang, Y. and Tsai, L. W., “Structure synthesis of a class of 4-DoF and 5-DoF Parallel manipulators with identical limb structures,” Int. J. Robot. Res., 21 (9), 799–810 (September 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Refaat, S., Hervé, J. M., Nahavandi, S. and Trinh, H., “Asymmetrical three-DOFs rotational-translational parallel-kinematics mechanisms based on Lie-group theory,” Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, 25 (3), 550–558, (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Selig, J. M., Geometrical Methods in Robotics (Springer, Heidelberg, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Tsai, L.-W., Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators (Wiley, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
29. Refaat, S., Hervé, J. M. Nahavandi, S. and Trinh, H., “High-Precision Five-Axis Machine for High-Speed Material Processing Using Linear Motors and Parallel-Serial Kinematics, Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, Prague, Czech Republic, 501–506 (September 20–22, 2006).Google Scholar
30. Liu, X.-J., Wang, J. and Pritschow, G., “A new family of spatial 3-dof fully parallel manipulators with high rotational capability,” Mech. Mach. Theory 40 (4), 475–494 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar