Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:26:28.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coincidence and Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Penelope Mackie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is about a puzzle concerning the metaphysics of material objects: a puzzle generated by cases where material objects appear to coincide, sharing all their matter. As is well known, it can be illustrated by the example of a statue. In front of me now, sitting on my desk, is a (small) statue – a statue of a lion. The statue is made of clay. So in front of me now is a piece of clay. But what is the relation between the statue and the piece of clay? Are they identical, or are they distinct?

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 62 , July 2008 , pp. 151 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, L. R. 2000. Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. 2003. ‘The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and its Matter’. Mind 112: 195–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, A. 1975. ‘Contingent Identity’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4: 187–221. Reprinted in Rea 1997.Google Scholar
Hawley, K. 2001. How Things Persist. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 1992. ‘Constitution Is Not Identity’. Mind 101: 89–105. Reprinted in Rea 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1971. ‘Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies’. Journal of Philosophy 68: 203–11. Reprinted in D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers, Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackie, P. 2007. ‘Coincidence and Modal Predicates’. Analysis 67: 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, T. 2001. Objects and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, H. 1991. ‘Indeterminate Identity, Contingent Identity and Abelardian Predicates’. Philosophical Quarterly 41: 183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, H. 1993. ‘Constitution is Identity’. Mind 102: 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noonan, H. 2008. ‘Moderate Monism and Modality’. Analysis 68: 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, M., ed. 1997. Material Constitution: A Reader. Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sider, T. 1996. ‘All the World's a Stage’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74: 433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, T. 2001. Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 1987. ‘Persons and Other Beings’. In Tomberlin, J. E., ed., Philosophical Perspectives, I. California: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1980. Sameness and Substance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar