No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Extract
It is generally agreed that the most influential philosophers in America are Charles S. Peirce, William James and John Dewey. James's fame came rather suddenly in the latter half of his life—roughly, from 1880 to 1910; it flourished with the appearance of his Principles of Psychology (1890) and shortly thereafter with his advocacy of pragmatism and radical empiricism. James was acclaimed in England and Europe as well as in America. Peirce, on the other hand, was almost entirely neglected; his work remained unknown to all but a few philosophers and his chief acknowledgment was as a scientist and logician. His importance began to be recognized and his immense researches and writings studied some twenty-five years after his death. It was otherwise with Dewey. During his long lifetime his ideas not only engaged the reflections and critical discussions of philosophers, he also had a profound and contagious influence on education, the social sciences, aesthetics, and political theory and practice. In this respect his thought has reached a wider audience in America than that of either Peirce or James. In his day lawyers, labour leaders, scientists and several heads of state attested to the vitality of his wisdom.
- Type
- Papers
- Information
- Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 19: American Philosophy , March 1985 , pp. 69 - 89
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1985
References
1 ‘Illusory Psychology’, Mind 12 (1887)Google Scholar. Reprinted in John Dewey, The Early Works (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1969) 1Google Scholar, see p. 171. This is the definitive edition of Dewey's published writings, Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), chronologically arranged in Early, Middle and Later periods. At present twenty-six volumes, the complete edition will be thirty-three volumes. All references below to Dewey's Works are to this edition.
2 Dykhuizen, George, The Life and Mind of John Dewey (Carbondale and Edwardsville, Southern Illinois University Press, 1973), 2.Google Scholar
3 ‘From Absolutism to Experimentalism’, in Adams, George P. and Montague, W. P. (eds.), Contemporary American Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1930), II, 13–27.Google Scholar
4 See n. 1 above.
5 The School and Society, Middle Works, 1, 1–109.Google Scholar
6 Ethics (1908)Google Scholar; How We Think (1910)Google Scholar; Democracy and Education (1916)Google Scholar; Essays in Experimental Logic (1916)Google Scholar; Human Nature and Conduct (1922)Google Scholar; Experience and Nature (1925)Google Scholar; The Public and its Problems (1927)Google Scholar; The Quest for Certainty (1929)Google Scholar; Philosophy and Civilization (1931)Google Scholar; Art as Experience (1934)Google Scholar; Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (1938)Google Scholar. For the first eight of these books see Middle Works, Vols 5, 6, 9, 12, 14Google Scholar, Later Works, Vols 1, 2, 4.Google Scholar
7 The Quest for Certainty, Later Works, 4, 204.Google Scholar
8 ‘Ethics and Physical Science’, Andover Review 7 (1887)Google Scholar; Early Works, 1, 209.Google Scholar
9 ‘Soul and Body’, Bibliotheca Sacra 43 (1886)Google Scholar; Early Works, 1, 93–115.Google Scholar
10 ‘The New Psychology’, Andover Review 2 (1884)Google Scholar; Early Works, 1, 60.Google Scholar
11 Early Works, 2.Google Scholar
12 ‘Soul and Body’, Early Works, 1, 103.Google Scholar
13 Ibid., 103.
14 His later title for ‘The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology’ (1896)Google Scholar when that paper was reprinted with some changes in Philosophy and Civilization (New York: Minton, Balch & Company, 1931), 233–248Google Scholar. In the table of contents the title appears as ‘The Unity of Behavior’.
15 ‘Soul and Body’, Early Works, 1, 103Google Scholar. The more complete statement is: ‘The simplest nerve action is not so simple as to exclude the adaptive, purposive factor. It is always an adjustment. It is never a mere mechanical result of a stimulus, but always involves selection, inhibition, and response.’
16 Psychological Review 3 (1896)Google Scholar; Early Works, 5, 96–109.Google Scholar
17 Boring, Edwin G., A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd edn (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950), 554Google Scholar. Also, Angel, J. R., ‘The Relations of Structural and Functional Psychology to Philosophy’, Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, First Series, Vol. 3, 55–73 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1903)Google Scholar. Angel was a student of William James and a younger colleague of Dewey's at Chicago.
18 ‘The Reflex Arc Concept’, Early Works, 5, 97–98.Google Scholar
19 Ibid., 98.
20 Ibid., 107–108.
21 The Quest for Certainty (The Gifford Lectures).
22 Studies in Logical Theory, Middle Works, 2, 295–375Google Scholar; How We Think, Middle Works, 6, 179–356Google Scholar. Essays in Experimental Logic (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1916)Google Scholar. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1938).Google Scholar
23 ‘The Development of American Pragmatism’, Later Works, 2, 14.Google Scholar
24 For Dewey's full statement see Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, 104–105.Google Scholar
25 This way of interpreting his conception of truth as a (functional) ‘correspondence’ theory was advanced by Dewey in a critical exchange with Bertrand Russell. See ‘Propositions, Warranted Assertibility and Truth’, Journal of Philosophy 38 (1946), 169–186.Google Scholar
26 Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, 132.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., 128–129.
28 Symposium, 200 A-C.
29 Reconstruction in Philosophy, Middle Works, 12, 181.Google Scholar
30 Art as Experience (New York: Minton, Balch and Company, 1934).Google Scholar
31 From an address Dewey delivered on his eightieth birthday, ‘Democracy as a Moral Ideal’. For the source and passage, Thayer, H. S. (ed.), Pragmatism: The Classic Writings (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1982), 261.Google Scholar
32 Democracy and Education, Middle Works, 9, 368.Google Scholar
33 Middle Works, 9.Google Scholar
34 Middle Works, 14.Google Scholar
35 A Common Faith (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1934).Google Scholar
36 Experience and Nature, Later Works, 1, and see p. 361.Google Scholar
37 I am grateful to Professor Marcus Singer for some valuable critical comments on the penultimate version of this essay.