Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:26:51.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Becoming, Cosmic Time and Rotating Universes1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2010

Mauro Dorato
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the literature on the compatibility between the time of our experience and the time of physics, the special theory of relativity has enjoyed central stage. By bringing into the discussion the general theory of relativity, I suggest a new analysis of the misunderstood notion of becoming, developed from hints in Gödel's published and unpublished arguments for the ideality of time. I claim that recent endorsements of such arguments, based on Gödel's own ‘rotating’ solution to Einstein's field equation, fail: once understood in the right way, becoming can be shown to be both mind-independent and compatible with spacetime physics. Being a needed tertium quid between views of time traditionally regarded as in conflict, such a new approach to becoming should also help to dissolve a crucial aspect of the century-old debate between the so-called A and B theories of time.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 50 , March 2002 , pp. 253 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boltzmann, L. 1896–1898. Vorlesungen über Gastheorie, transl. by Brush, S. [1964], Lectures on Gas Theory. 1896-1898. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1938. Examination of McTaggart's philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Callender, C. 1997. ‘Review of M. Dorato's Time and Reality, Bologna, Clueb 1995’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 117–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifton, R. and Hogarth, M. 1995. ‘The Definability of Becoming in Minkowski Spacetime’, Synthese, 103, 355–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieks, D. 1988. ‘Discussion: Special Relativity and the Flow of Time’, Philosophy of Science, 55, 456–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorato, M. 1995. Time and Reality, Clueb, Bologna.Google Scholar
Dorato, M. 1996. ‘On Becoming, Relativity and Non-separability’, Philosophy of Science, 64, 585–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorato, M. 2002. ‘Becoming and the Arrow of Causation’, Philosophy of Science, Supplement to vol. 67, 3, S523–534.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 1995. Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers and Shrieks. Singularities Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1920. Space, Time and Gravitation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faye, J. 1989. The Reality of the Future, Odense, Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. 1949a. ‘A Remark About the Relationship Between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, La Salle IL: Open Court, pp. 557-62, reprinted with corrections and additions in Gödel (1990).Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1949b. ‘An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solution of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation’, Review of Modern Physics, 21, 447–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, K. (1990. Collected Works, Feferman, S. et. al. (eds), Vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, K. (1995. Collected Works, Feferman, S. et. al. (eds), Vol. 3, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, W. 1979. ‘Special Relativity and the Present’, Philosophical Studies, 36, 233–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüinbaum, A. 1963. Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, New York: A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1987. Asymmetries in Time, Harvard Mass.: The Mit Press.Google Scholar
Jeans, J. 1936. ‘Man and the Universe’, Sir Stewart Alley Lecture, in Scientific Progress, New York: The McMillan Company, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1976. ‘Events as property exemplification’, in M., Brand and d., Walton (eds), Action Theory, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. (ed.) (1998. Questions of Time and Tense, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malament, D. 1995. ‘Introductory Note for 1949b’ in Gödel (1995), Collected Works, Feferman, S.et. al. (eds), Vol. 3, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 261–69.Google Scholar
Maxwell, N. 1985. ‘Are Probabilism and Special Relativity Incompatible?’, Philosophy of Science, 52, pp. 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, J. 1908. ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind, 68, pp. 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D. H. 1997. Real Time II, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oaklander, N., and Smith, Q. (eds) (1994. The New Theory of Time, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oaklander, N. 1998. Freedom and the New Theory of Time, in Le Poidevin, R. (ed.) (1998. Questions of Time and Tense, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, A. 1992. God, Eternity and the Nature of Time, New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1967. ‘Time and Physical Geometry’, The Journal of Philosophy, 64, pp. 240–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. v. O. 1987. ‘Space-time’, in Quiddities, Harvard University Press: Harvard Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakic, N. 1997. ‘Past, present and future and special relativity’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietdijk, C. 1966. ‘A rigorous proof of determinism derived from the special theory of relativity’, Philosophy of Science, 33, 341–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovelli, C. 1997. ‘Half-way through the woods: Contemporary Research in Space and Time’, in Earman, J. and Norton, J. (eds), The Cosmos of Science, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 180–224.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1915. ‘On the Experience of Time’, Monist, 25, 212–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, S. 1996. ‘Time, Quantum Mechanics and Tense’, Synthese, 107, 19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savitt, S. 1994. ‘The Replacement of Time’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savitt, S. (2002. ‘There's No Time Like the Present (in Minkowski space-time)’, in Howard, D. (ed.), PSA 98, part II, Supplement to volume 67, 3, S563-S573.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1962. ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man’, in Colodny, R. (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 35–78.Google Scholar
Smith, Q. 2002. ‘Review of Philip Turezsky's Time’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 51, 27–933.Google Scholar
Stein, H. 1968. ‘On Einstein-Minkowski spacetime’, Journal of Philosophy, 65, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. 1970. ‘On the Paradoxical Time-Structure of Gödel,’ Philosophy of Science, 37, 589–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, H. 1991. ‘On Relativity Theory and Openness of the Future’, Philosophy of Science, 58, 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, M. 1997. Time, Tense and Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, H. 1995. ‘Time in Philosophy and in Physics from Kant and Einstein to Gödel’, Synthese, 102, 215–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingard, R. 1972. ‘Relativity and the Reality of Past and Future Events’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 23, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyl, H. 1918. Raum-Zeit Materie, Berlin, J. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. 1951. ‘The Myth of Passage’, reprinted in R. Gale (ed.) 1967, The Philosophy of Time, New York: Anchor Books, pp. 98-116.Google Scholar
P., Yourgrau 1991. The Disappearance of Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
P., Yourgrau 1999. Gödel meets Einstein, New York: Open Court.Google Scholar