Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:28:18.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psycholinguistics: Competence and Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2010

Judith Greene
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has been a tendency, natural perhaps in such ‘verbal’ disciplines as philosophy and linguistics, to assume that language and communication are the same thing. But while no one would deny that language is one powerful medium of human communication, is it the only one? Is there any real distinction between communicating one's desire to leave a dinner party by making verbal remarks like, ‘I must go’ or ‘We could only get Jane as a babysitter’, as opposed to fidgeting, standing up and looking longingly towards the door? As Michael Argyle argues, a great deal of information is conveyed by non-verbal cues. To take the argument a step further, are even verbal statements examples of purely linguistic communication ? Whereas the manifest linguistic content of ‘I must go’ is obvious to anyone who speaks English, the meaning of the remark about the babysitter can only be understood by those who know the particular neighbourhood social context in which it was uttered. Does it make sense, then, to try and analyse the linguistic structure and content of an utterance without taking into account the use to which it is being put in a particular extra-linguistic context?

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 10 , March 1976 , pp. 79 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carroll, LewisThrough the Looking Glass (1872), London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (1965), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.Language and Mind (1968), New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.Explorations in the Functions of Language (1973), London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Herriot, P. ‘The comprehension of active and passive sentences as a function of pragmatic expectations, journal-title of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 8 (1969), 166–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. ‘What is a speech act?’ in Black, M. (Ed.) Philosophy in America (1965), London: Allen and Unwin, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 221–39.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F.Verbal Behaviour (1957), New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar