Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Kershaw, Michael
2012.
The ‘nec plus ultra’ of precision measurement: Geodesy and the forgotten purpose of the Metre Convention.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 4,
p.
563.
Tal, Eran
2013.
Old and New Problems in Philosophy of Measurement.
Philosophy Compass,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 12,
p.
1159.
Mizrahi, Moti
2013.
What is Scientific Progress? Lessons from Scientific Practice.
Journal for General Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 2,
p.
375.
KERSHAW, MICHAEL
2014.
‘A thorn in the side of European geodesy’: measuring Paris–Greenwich longitude by electric telegraph.
The British Journal for the History of Science,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 4,
p.
637.
Schwartz, Daniel
2014.
Is Baconian Natural History Theory-Laden?.
Journal of Early Modern Studies,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
63.
Toomela, Aaro
2016.
Centrality of History for Theory Construction in Psychology.
p.
47.
Sterpetti, Fabio
2017.
Sulla concezione noetica del progresso scientifico.
PARADIGMI,
p.
135.
Sterpetti, Fabio
2018.
Building Theories.
Vol. 41,
Issue. ,
p.
213.
Solberg, Mads
2021.
A Cognitive Ethnography of Knowledge and Material Culture.
p.
413.
Khalifa, Kareem
and
Goldberg, Sanford C.
2022.
Socio‐functional foundations in science: The case of measurement.
Philosophical Issues,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 1,
p.
382.
Hijmans, Sarah N.
2022.
Analogy and Composition in Early Nineteenth-Century Chemistry The Case of Aluminium.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
Schoenmakers, Ludo L.J.
2023.
Scientific progress, normative discussions, and the pragmatic account of definitions of life.
Synthese,
Vol. 201,
Issue. 4,