Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:13:50.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time Travel and Modern Physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2010

Frank Arntzenius  and
Tim Maudlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Time travel has been a staple of science fiction. With the advent of general relativity it has been entertained by serious physicists. But, especially in the philosophy literature, there have been arguments that time travel is inherently paradoxical. The most famous paradox is the grandfather paradox: you travel back in time and kill your grandfather, thereby preventing your own existence. To avoid inconsistency some circumstance will have to occur which makes you fail in this attempt to kill your grandfather. Doesn't this require some implausible constraint on otherwise unrelated circumstances? We examine such worries in the context of modern physics.

Type
Papers
Information
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements , Volume 50 , March 2002 , pp. 169 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Deutsch, D. 1991. ‘Quantum mechanics near closed timelike curves,’ Physical Review D 44, 3197–217. andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, D. and Lockwood, M. 1994. ‘The quantum physics of time travel’, Scientific American, March 1994, 68–74.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 1972. ‘Implications of causal propagation outsider the null cone,’ in Foundations of Space–Time Theory, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol VII, Earman, J., Glymour, C. and Stachel, J. (eds), pp 94–108. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. 1995. Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, J. and Smeenk, C. 1999. ‘Take a ride on a time machine,’ Manuscript.Google Scholar
Echeverria, R, Klinkhammer, G., and Thorne, K. 1991. ‘Billiard ball in wormhole spacetimes with closed timelike curves: classical theory,’ Physical Review D, Vol 44 No 4, 1077–99.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. et. al. 1990. ‘Cauchy problem in spacetimes with closed time-like lines,’ Physical Review D 42, 1915–30.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. and Morris, M. 1991. ‘The Cauchy problem for the scalar wave equation is well defined on a class of spacetimes with closed time-like curves,’ Physical Review letters 66, 401–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geroch, R. and Horowitz, G. 1979. ‘Global structures of spacetimes,’ in General Relativity, an Einstein Centenary Survey, Hawking, S. and Israel, W., eds.Google Scholar
Gödel, K.. 1949. ‘A remark about the relationship between relativity theory and idealistic philosophy,’ in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by Schilpp, P., pp. 557–62. Open Court, La Salle.Google Scholar
Hocking, J., and Young, G. 1961. Topology. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1987. ‘Time travel,’ in Asymmetries in time. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malament, D. 1985a. ‘“Time travel” in the Gödel universe,’ PSA 1984, Vol 2, 91–100. Asquith, P. and Kitcher, P. editors. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
Malament, D. 1985b. ‘Minimal acceleration requirements for “time travel” in Gödel spacetime,’ Journal of Mathematical Physics 26, 774–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudlin, T. 1990. ‘Time Travel and topology,’ PSA 1990, Vol 1, 303–15. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
Novikov, I. 1992. ‘Time machine and self-consistent evolution in problems with self–interaction,’ Physical Review D 45, 1989–1994.Google ScholarPubMed
Thorne, K. 1994. Black Holes and Time Warps, Einstein's Outrageous Legacy. W.W. Norton: London and New York.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J. and Feynman, R. 1949. ‘Classical electrodynamics in terms of direct interparticle action,’ Reviews of Modern Physics 21, 425–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yurtsever, U. 1990. ‘Test fields on compact spacentimes,’ Journal of Mathematical Physics 31, 3064–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar