Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:46:10.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patrician Landscapes and the Picturesque in Nottinghamshire c.1750–c.1850

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

RICHARD A. GAUNT
RICHARD A. GAUNT*
Affiliation:
Department of History, School of Humanities, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK richard.gaunt@nottingham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article considers the Dukeries estates of north Nottinghamshire in the heyday of aristocratic power and prestige, from the mid Georgian to the mid Victorian period. It poses a contrast between visitors' impressions of the area as one of constancy and continuity, a point of reassurance in an age of political and social upheaval, and the reality of internal changes from within. Closely crowded as these estates were, their aristocratic owners competed with one another to fashion the most economically viable and aesthetically pleasing symbol of status and power. The article pays close attention to the hold which picturesque principles exercised on individual owners and considers the role of plantation, animals and water in parkland management and improvement. Finally, the article considers the extent to which the estates were sites of contestation. Owners attempted to keep unwanted plebeian incursions at bay, whilst carefully controlling access on set-piece occasions such as coming-of-age festivities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Rural History , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , October 2015 , pp. 161 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Brooke, John and Sorensen, Mary, eds, Prime Ministers' Papers: W. E. Gladstone, II (London, 1972), pp. 22–3Google Scholar.

2. On the romantic connotations of Sherwood, see Carter, James, A Visit to Sherwood Forest including the Abbeys of Newstead, Rufford, and Welbeck. . .With a Critical Essay on the Life and Times of Robin Hood (London, 1850 Google Scholar); Rodgers, Joseph, The Scenery of Sherwood Forest with an Account of Some Eminent People Once Resident There (London, 1908).Google Scholar

3. For these ideas, see Everett, Nigel, The Tory View of Landscape (Yale, 1994)Google Scholar; Girouard, Mark, The Return to Camelot: Chivalry and the English Gentleman (Yale, 1981)Google Scholar.

4. Lewis, W. S., ed., The Correspondence of Horace Walpole, Vol.32 The Countess of Upper Ossory (Yale, 1965), pp. 374–5.Google Scholar

5. Crook, David, ‘The Struggle over Forest Boundaries in Nottinghamshire, 1218–1227’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 83 (1979), 35–45 Google Scholar; Nottinghamshire Archives, DD 148, ‘Study on the Enclosure and Clearing of Sherwood Forest in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’ (n.d.).

6. Ben Cowell, ‘Patrician Landscapes, Plebian Cultures: Parks and Society in two English Counties, c.1750–1850’ (unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham, 1998), p. 128; Cameron, Alan, ‘Some Social Consequences of the Dissolution of the Monasteries in Nottinghamshire’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 79 (1975), 50–9.Google Scholar

7. Cowell, ‘Landscapes’, pp. 69, 120Google Scholar; Beckett, J. V., A History of Laxton: England's Last Open-Field Village (Oxford, 1989).Google Scholar

8. On their later history, see Redfern, Roger A., Dukeries of Nottinghamshire: And Adjacent Districts of Derbyshire and South Yorkshire (Clapham, Yorkshire, 1974)Google Scholar; Waller, Robert J., The Dukeries Transformed: The Social and Political Development of a Twentieth-Century Coalfield (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar

9. On improvement, see Seymour, Susanne, ‘The Dukeries Estates: Improving Land and Landscape in the Later Eighteenth Century’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 97 (1993), 117–28Google Scholar; Daniels, Stephen and Seymour, Susanne, ‘Landscape Design and the Idea of Improvement 1730–1900’ in Dodgshon, R. A. and Butlin, R. A., eds, An Historical Geography of England and Wales, 2 nd ed. (London, 1990), pp. 487–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Although the terminology of patrician and plebeian is largely associated with the work of E. P. Thompson, ‘it has been applied to Nottinghamshire in the work of Cowell, ‘Landscapes’, amongst others; also see Susanne Seymour, ‘Eighteenth-Century Parkland “Improvement” on the Dukeries' Estates of north Nottinghamshire’ (unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham, 1988) and Cowell, Ben, ‘The Politics of Park Management in Nottinghamshire, c.1750–1850’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 101 (1997), 133–43.Google Scholar

11. See Beckett, J. V., The Aristocracy in England, 1660–1914 (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar

12. Schama, Simon, Landscape and Memory (London, 1995).Google Scholar

13. Baddeley, Virginia, ‘The Early Eighteenth Century Gardens of Worksop Manor, Nottinghamshire’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 100 (1996), 123–36.Google Scholar

14. Jane Brown, The Omnipotent Magician: Lancelot ‘Capability’ Brown 1716–83 (2011); Rosemary Hill, ‘As God Intended’, London Review of Books, 5th January 2012, 18–20.

15. Pevsner, N. and Williamson, E., The Buildings of England. Nottinghamshire (New Haven and London, 1979), pp. 390–2Google Scholar; Binney, M., ‘Worksop Manor, Nottinghamshire’, Country Life, 153 (1973), 678–82, 750–3.Google Scholar

16. Bateman, John, The Great Landowners of Great Britain and Ireland [4th edition 1883] (Leicester, 1971), p. 334.Google Scholar

17. Newcastle Diary, 19th September 1843 in Gaunt, Richard A., ed., Unhappy Reactionary. The Diaries of the Fourth Duke of Newcastle-under-Lyne, 1822–50 (Thoroton Society Record Series, 43, Nottingham, 2003), p. 244.Google Scholar

18. For a unique visual record of the dismantling of Worksop Manor, see Gaunt, Richard A., ed., Emma's Sketchbook. Scenes of Nottinghamshire Life in the 1840s (Nottingham, 2013), pp. 65–7.Google Scholar

19. Worsley, Lucy, Cavalier: The Biography of a Seventeenth Century Household (London, 2007)Google Scholar; Durant, David N., The Smythson Circle: The Story of Six Great English Houses (London, 2011)Google Scholar; Turberville, A. S., A History of Welbeck Abbey and its Owners, 2 vols. (London, 1938–9).Google Scholar

20. Defoe, Daniel, A Tour through the Whole Island of Great Britain, (1724–6), Rogers, Pat, ed. (Harmondsworth, 1971), p. 457.Google Scholar

21. See the correspondence between Speechley and the 3rd Duke of Portland in the University of Nottingham, Manuscripts and Special Collections [afterwards UNMASC], Pw F 8428–8491, covering the period 1767–95.

22. Claudia L. Johnson, ‘Behold the Genius of the Place’, Times Literary Supplement, 30th July 2010, p. 17.

23. Gore, A. and Carter, G., eds, Humphry Repton's Memoirs (Norwich, 2005), p. 29.Google Scholar

24. Seymour, Dukeries Estates, pp. 145–7. By the 1870s, the family owned some 43,000 acres in Nottinghamshire. This represented under a quarter of its total national landownership, the larger part of which consisted of over 118,000 acres in Scotland: Bateman, Great Landowners, p. 365.

25. Cowell, ‘Landscape’, p. 97.

26. Gore and Carter, Memoirs, pp. 30, 33–4.

27. Ibid., p. 32.

28. For insights into the elusive Talman, see Giles Worsley, ‘William Talman: Some Stylistic Suggestions’, The Georgian Group Journal (1992), 6–18.

29. Hodson, J. H., ‘The Building and Alteration of the Second Thoresby House, 1767–1804’ in Hodson, J. H., Kennedy, P. A. and Walker, Violet W., eds., A Nottinghamshire Miscellany (Thoroton Society Record Series, 21, Nottingham, 1962), pp. 16–20.Google Scholar

30. Seymour, Dukeries Estates, pp. 182–4. A century later, the family owned 26,771 acres in Nottinghamshire, by the far the largest concentration of their English estates: Bateman, Great Landowners, p. 298.

31. Cowell, ‘Landscape’, p. 97; UNMASC, Ma 4P21, Humphry Repton, Thoresby Park in Nottinghamshire, a seat of Charles Pierrepont, Esq (1791).

32. Gore and Carter, Memoirs, pp. 115–16.

33. The family had already sold the Worksop estate in 1890. For the later period of Clumber's history, see Fletcher, John, Ornament of Sherwood Forest: From Ducal Estate to Public Park (Bakewell, 2005)Google Scholar.

34. Morrison, Sara, ‘The Creation of Clumber Park, 1709–14. The Last Royal Park of Sherwood Forest’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 106 (2002), 103–18Google Scholar; Curtis, J., A Topographical History of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire, Parts 1–8 (London, 1843–1844), p. 65 Google Scholar; J. M. Clifton, ‘“An enchanted palace”: Clumber Park, the Newcastle family Seat’ (unpublished undergraduate dissertation, University of Nottingham, 1979).

35. Seymour, Dukeries Estates, pp. 197–9. By the 1870s, the family owned 34,467 acres in Nottinghamshire (yielding £73,098), with a further 1,080 acres (yielding £1,449) in Derbyshire, Lincolnshire and the West Riding of Yorkshire: Bateman, Great Landowners, p. 331.

36. For the 2nd Duke's interventions at Clumber, see Gaunt, Richard A., ‘Crafting Clumber: The Dukes of Newcastle and the Nottinghamshire Landscape’, Landscape History, 33 (2012), 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Smith, Pete, ‘Rufford Abbey and its Gardens in the 17th and 18th Centuries’, English Heritage Historical Review, 4 (2009), 122–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar, provides a comprehensive and beautifully illustrated history.

38. Newcastle Diary, 20th February 1837 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, p. 23; Beattie, A., Thoresby Hall, the Nottinghamshire Seat of the Countess Manvers: An Illustrated Survey & Guide, 3rd ed., revised by Stanley, C. W. N. (Derby, 1964).Google Scholar

39. Newcastle Diary, 13th September 1824 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, p. 9.

40. Newcastle Diary, 25th March, 4th April 1838 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, p. 214.

41. Beckett, Aristocracy, pp. 43–90.

42. For its prominence in all walks of life in Nottinghamshire during this period, see Gaunt, Richard A., ed., ‘It's not what you know’. Patronage in Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century Nottinghamshire (Southwell, 2012)Google Scholar.

43. Watkins, Charles and Cowell, Ben, Uvedale Price (1747–1829): Decoding the Picturesque (Woodbridge, 2012)Google Scholar; Watkins, Charles and Cowell, Ben, eds, Letters of Uvedale Price (Walpole Society, Vol. 68, Leeds, 2006)Google Scholar; Cowell, Fiona, Richard Woods (1715–1793): Master of the Pleasure Garden (Woodbridge, 2010).Google Scholar

44. Everett, Tory View, pp. 91–122; Cowell, ‘Landscape’, p. 61.

45. Gore and Carter, Memoirs, p. 141.

46. Gaunt, ‘Crafting Clumber’, 91–9.

47. Cowell, ‘Landscape’, pp. 258–61 provides a comprehensive list.

48. Curtis, Nottinghamshire, p. 66.

49. Seymour, Susanne, ‘Landed Estates, the “spirit of planting” and Woodland Management in Later Georgian Britain: A Case Study from the Dukeries, Nottinghamshire’ in Watkins, Charles, ed., European Woods and Forests: Studies in Cultural History (Oxford, 1998), pp. 115–34Google Scholar; Seymour, Susanne, ‘The “Spirit of Planting”: Eighteenth Century Parkland “improvement” on the Duke of Newcastle's North Nottinghamshire Estates’, The East Midland Geographer, 12 (1989), 5–13.Google Scholar

50. Defoe, Tour, p. 455.

51. Lowe, Robert, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Nottingham, with observations on the means of its improvement. Drawn up for the consideration of the Board of Agriculture and internal improvement (London, 1798)Google Scholar; also see The Fourteenth Report of the Commissioners appointed to enquire into the State and Condition of the Woods, Forests and Land Revenues of the Crown, and to sell or alienate Fee Farm and other Unimproveable [sic] Rents in House of Commons Journal, 48 (1793), 467–511.

52. This paragraph is based on Seymour's work, cited at n. 49.

53. Daniels, Stephen, ‘The Political Iconography of Woodland in later Georgian England’ in Cosgrove, D. and Daniels, S., eds, The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments (Cambridge, 1988), 43–82 Google Scholar; Newcastle Diary, 14th February 1833 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, p. 201; UNMASC, Ne 3A/32, account for purchasing lime plants from Fisher, Holmes and Company (nursery and seedsmen of 12 King Street, Sheffield), 15th May 1838.

54. Seymour, Susanne and Calvocoressi, Rupert, ‘Landscape Parks and the Memorialisation of Empire: The Pierreponts’ “Naval Seascape” in Thoresby Park, Nottinghamshire during the French Wars, 1793–1815’, Rural History, 18 (2007), 95–118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wheeler, P. T., ‘The Grounds of Newstead Abbey’, The East Midland Geographer, 12 (1989), 53–8Google Scholar; Roach, Alistair, ‘Miniature Ships in Designed Landscapes’, The Mariner's Mirror, 98 (2012), 46–50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coope, Rosalys and Smith, Pete, Newstead Abbey. A Nottinghamshire Country House: Its Owners and Architectural History 1540–1931 (Thoroton Society Record Series, 48, Nottingham, 2014), p. 78.Google Scholar

55. Seymour, ‘Spirit of Planting’, 9–11.

56. Gaunt, Emma's Sketchbook, pp. 55–56; Rooke, Hayman, Descriptions and Sketches of some Remarkable Oaks, in the Park at Welbeck, in the County of Nottingham, a Seat of His Grace The Duke of Portland. To which are added, observations on the age and durability of that tree. With remarks on the annual growth of the acorn (London, 1790).Google Scholar

57. Thomson, Christopher, The Autobiography of an Artisan (London, 1847), pp. 406–7Google Scholar; also see Charles Watkins, ‘“A solemn and gloomy umbrage”: Changing Interpretations of the Ancient Oaks of Sherwood Forest’ in Watkins, Woods and Forests, pp. 93–113; Charles Watkins, Trees, Woods and Forests: A Social and Cultural History (2014), chapter 6; Clifton, Steven J., ‘The Status of Sherwood's Ancient Oaks,’ Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 104 (2000), 51–64.Google Scholar

58. Cowell, ‘Landscape’, p. 117; Warner, Tim, ‘Early Landscape Preservation in the Dukeries: The 5th Duke of Portland and the Coming of the Railways’, The East Midland Geographer, 12 (1989), 34–43 Google Scholar; Steven J. Clifton, ‘The Veteran Trees of Birklands and Bilhaugh [sic], Sherwood Forest, Nottinghamshire,’ English Nature Research Report, Number 361 (2000).

59. He was not much missed: Newcastle Diary, 26th February 1835 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, p. 104.

60. For the earlier history of Bestwood, see Gillett, S., ‘Bestwood: A Sherwood Forest Park in the Seventeenth Century’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 89 (1985), 57–74 Google Scholar; Cook, T. H., ‘Bestwood Park: Hunting Ground of Kings’, Nottinghamshire Historian, 14 (1974), 2–5.Google Scholar

61. Curtis, Nottinghamshire, p. 122. For a dissenting voice about developments at Welbeck, see Hanson, Michael, ed., Ducal Estate Management in Georgian Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire: The Diary of William Gould, 1783–1788 (Thoroton Society Record Series, 44, Nottingham, 2006).Google Scholar

62. Newcastle Diary, 4th September 1833 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, p. 202.

63. Newcastle Diary, 13th-19th October 1831 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, pp. 84–6.

64. Curtis described the Reform Riots as ‘a standing reproach and monument of outrages resulting from some of the basest of human passions, revenge and personal antipathy, from a mere difference of political opinion’: Nottinghamshire, p. xv.

65. Cowell, ‘Landscape’, pp. 61, 210, 213; the political dimensions of the picturesque are explored in Williamson, T., Polite Landscapes: Gardens and Society in Eighteenth-Century England (Stroud, 1995)Google Scholar and Copley, S. and Garside, P., eds, The Politics of the Picturesque (Cambridge, 1994).Google Scholar

66. UNMASC, Ne A 273/34, 279/2.

67. Alexander Somerville, The Whistler at the Plough, ed., K.D.M. Snell (London, 1989), pp. xi, 172.

68. Cowell, ‘Landscape’, p. 113.

69. See Fowkes, D. V., ‘Nottinghamshire Parks in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 71 (1967), 72–89 Google Scholar; Fowkes, D. V., ‘The Breck System of Sherwood Forest’, Transactions of the Thoroton Society of Nottinghamshire, 81 (1977), 55–61.Google Scholar

70. Curtis, Nottinghamshire, p. 64; also see Bradbury, David J., Secrets of Sherwood (Mansfield, 1987).Google Scholar

71. Newcastle Diary, 6th-12th, 16th January 1833 in Gaunt, Unhappy Reactionary, pp. 198–200; Godfrey Tallents' diary, 11th January 1833 in Gaunt, Richard A., ed., Politics, Law and Society in Nottinghamshire: The Diaries of Godfrey Tallents of Newark, 1829–1839 (Nottingham, 2010), p. 44.Google Scholar

72. On events at Rufford, see Nottinghamshire Archives, DD 416/3, newspaper account of the ‘Rufford Affray’; DD/SR/211/210, Gamekeeper's account book of Frederick Brock.

73. In this respect, the Dukeries were typical of the English aristocracy as a whole; Beckett, Aristocracy, pp. 206–86.

74. A process described widely in Mandler, Peter, The Fall and Rise of the Stately Home (Yale, 1999)Google Scholar and locally in Matthew Kempson, ‘The State and the Country House in Nottinghamshire, 1937–1967’ (unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham, 2006).