Article contents
Picturesque Landscaping and Estate Management: Uvedale Price at Foxley, 1770–1829
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2009
Extract
Georgian landscaping is conventionally studied as an example of high culture, in terms of the history of art, literature and aesthetics. We take a more down to earth view and look at landscaping as an example of estate management, in terms of such topics as farming, planting, leases and rents. We do not pretend that the study of estate management offers a sort of ground-truth for understanding landscaping. Terms like ‘rent’ and ‘estate’ are of course no more eternal, nor less ideological, than terms like ‘picturesque’ and ‘landscape’. We will not neglect high culture, indeed a central theme of the paper is how the aesthetics of painting helped frame estate management. Even a casual reading of the literature on ‘improvement’ in the eighteenth century reveals a complex overlapping of not just economic and aesthetic issues but moral and political ones too. And the point of this paper is to reinsert landscaping and estate management into this complex.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991
References
Notes
1 The general issue of this paper is also discussed in Daniels, Stephen and Seymour, Susanne ‘Landscape design and the idea of “improvement”’ in Dodgshon, R. and Butlin, R.A., A New Historical Geography of England and Wales, Second Edition (London, 1990)Google Scholar; Seymour, Susanne ‘Eighteenth-century parkland “improvement” on the Dukeries estates of north Nottinghamshire’ unpublished PhD thesis (University of Nottingham, 1989)Google Scholar; Daniels, Stephen with Seymour, Susanne and Watkins, Charles, ‘Landscaping and estate management in later Georgian England’, in Hunt, J.D. (ed.), Landscape and Garden (Washington D.C., in press)Google Scholar; and ‘Parkland design and management’, special issue of the East Midland Geographer, 12 (1–2) 1989.Google Scholar
2 Lambin, Denis A., ‘Foxley: The Price's estate in Herefordshire’, Journal of Garden History 7 (1987), 244–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar While there are important differences between Lambin and ourselves in interpreting Price and his estate, we wish to record our debt to both his article and his generous reading of an earlier draft of our article here.
3 Jones, E.L., ‘Agricultural conditions and changes in Herefordshire, 1660–1815; Transactions of the Woolhope Naturalists’ Field Club 37(1962), 32–55Google Scholar; Marshall, William, The Rural Economy of Gloucestershire; including its Dairy: together with the Dairy Management of North Wiltshire and the Management of Orchards and Fruit Liquor in Herefordshire (London, 1789)Google Scholar; Thirsk, Joan (ed.), The Agrarian History of England and Wales: Volume V, 1640–1750, I. Regional Farming Systems (1984).Google Scholar
4 Rackham, Oliver, Ancient Woodland: Its History, Vegetation and Uses in England (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Watkins, Charles, Woodland Management and Conservation (Newton Abbot, 1990)Google Scholar; Herefordshire and Radnorshire Naturalists Trust (HRNT), Herefordshire Woodland Survey (Hereford, 1984).Google Scholar
5 Spencer, Jonathan, Ancient Woodland on the Foxley Estate (Nature Conservancy Council, Internal Report, 1987).Google Scholar
6 Lambin, , ‘Foxley’.Google Scholar
7 This list has an extraordinary story. It was discovered by Bryan Little on the flypage of a copy of James Gibbs’ Book of Architecture which he saw in an antiquarian book dealer's shop in London in the 1950s. He made a transcript of this list, but did not purchase the book, which cannot now be traced. Little made use of information from this list in a BBC Midland Home Service radio broadcast on 20th May 1956. The script of this broadcast was discovered by the authors in Hereford City Library. Bryan Little kindly provided a photocopy of his full transcript of the marginalia when we wrote to him in 1988. This is referred to in the text as the ‘Little transcript’.
8 A book of survey containing the Manors of Yazor, Mancellacy, Bishopstone … with the contents and yearly estimates of Uvedale Price Esq. of Foxley … in the year of our Lord 1770, Hereford County Record Office (HCRO) D 344. This is referred to in the text as the ‘1770 survey’.
9 Horn, Pamela, ‘An eighteenth-century land agent: The career of Nathaniel Kent (1737–1810)’, Agricultural History Review 30 (1982), 1–16.Google Scholar
10 Nathaniel Kent, ‘A Survey of Foxley and its appendages in the County of Hereford, the estate of Uvedale Price Esq.’ This survey was discovered by Major D.J.C. Davenport in 1988. It is a small bound volume. The following statement is on the last page: ‘This estate was surveyed, modelled and sett by me upon the agreements contained in this book in the year 1774' Signed Nath. Kent, Fulham 20.9.1774. The authors would like to thank Major Davenport for letting us make use of this survey. This is referred to in the text as the ‘1774 survey’.
11 Kent, Nathaniel, Hints to Gentlemen of Landed Property, (London, 1775)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Horn, ‘Career of Nathaniel Kent’.Google Scholar
12 Little transcript.
13 Allentuck, Marcia, ‘Sir Uvedale Price and the Picturesque Garden: the Evidence of the Coleorton Papers’ (Washington DC, 1974) Figure 17Google Scholar; Lambin, , ‘Foxley’, p. 252.Google Scholar
14 Kent, , Hints, p. 194.Google Scholar
15 Kent, , Hints.Google Scholar
16 Thirsk, , Agrarian HistoryGoogle Scholar; Robinson, Guy, ‘Agricultural Depression, 1870–1900; Transactions of the Woolhope Naturalists’ Field Club 42 (1978), 259–78.Google Scholar
17 Kent, , Hints, p. 208.Google Scholar
18 Kent, , 1774 survey.Google Scholar
19 Ibid.
20 Ibid.
21 Ibid.
22 Ibid.
23 Ibid.
24 Hereford County Record Office (HCRO) B 47/- H8; H13; H23.
25 HCRO B 47/- D220–22.
26 Kent, , 1774 survey.Google Scholar
27 Rackham, , Ancient Woodland, p. 201.Google Scholar
28 Hereford Journal, 18th 03 1795Google Scholar. David Whitehead kindly provided this information.
29 HCRO B 47/- D97.
30 Kent, , 1774 survey.Google Scholar
31 Clark, John, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Hereford (London, 1794).Google Scholar
32 Clark, , General ViewGoogle Scholar; Duncumb, John, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Hereford (London, 1805)Google Scholar; HRNT Woodland Survey.
33 Uvedale Price to Lord Aberdeen, 6 February 1818, British Museum Add. MSS.
34 Uvedale Price to Beaumont, 11 November 1812, Coleorton MSS, Pierpont Morgan Library, New York.
35 Uvedale Price to Beaumont, August 1803, Coleorton MSS.
36 HCRO B 47/- D303–07.
37 HCRO B 47/- H70–1 D97.
38 Uvedale Price to Beaumont, 14 August 1812, Coleorton MSS.
39 HCRO Knight papers T74 728.
40 HCRO Knight papers T74 728 5.
41 HCRO Knight papers T74 590.
42 Price, Uvedale, ‘On the bad effects of stripping and cropping trees; Annals of Agriculture 5 (1786), 241–50.Google Scholar
43 Duncumb, , General View.Google Scholar
44 Kent, , 1774 survey.Google Scholar
45 Kent, , 1774 survey.Google Scholar
46 Kent, , 1774 survey.Google Scholar
47 Thirsk, Joan (ed.), The Agrarian History of England and Wales: Volume V, 1640–1750, II. Agrarian Change (1985), 192–4.Google Scholar
48 HCRO B 47/-1 D97, 1.7.1774.
49 HCRO B 47/-1 D97, 2.2.1781.
50 Hereford Journal, 11th 12 1783Google Scholar. David Whitehead kindly provided this information.
51 Price, , ‘Bad Effects of Stripping’, p. 244.Google Scholar
52 Price, Uvedale, Essay on the Picturesque, as compared with the Sublime and the Beautiful; and on the Use of studying Pictures for the Purpose of improving real Landscape (London, 1794)Google Scholar; 1810 edition, I, 26–7.
53 Price, , Essay on the Picturesque p. 196.Google Scholar
54 Price, , ‘Bad Effects of Stripping’, p. 241.Google Scholar
55 HCRO B 47/- H70–1 D97 31.7.1799.
56 Kent, , Hints, pp. 235, 239, 278.Google Scholar
57 Kent, Nathaniel, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Norfolk (London, 1794), p. 46.Google Scholar
58 Price, Uvedale, ‘A letter to H. Repton Esq.’, in Essay on the Picturesqu III, 177.Google Scholar
59 Price, Uvedale, Thoughts on the defence of property (Hereford, 1797), pp. 11, 28, 20, 19.Google Scholar
60 Price, to Abercorn, Lord, 20 01 1801, B.M. Add. MSS.Google Scholar
61 Price, to Abercorn, Lord, 3 08 1798, B.M. Add. MSS.Google Scholar
62 Barrell, John, The Dark Side of the Landscape: The Rural Poor in English Painting 1730–1840 (Cambridge, 1980) pp. 116–7.Google Scholar
63 Barrell, , Dark Side, pp. 173–4.Google Scholar
64 Brayley, E.W. and Britten, J., The Beauties of England and Wales Vol VI (London, 1805), p. 581.Google Scholar
65 Marshall, William, A Review of the Landscape: Also of an Essay on the Picturesque (London, 1795), pp. 185 ff.Google Scholar
66 Lambin, , Foxley, p. 262.Google Scholar
67 Lambin, , Foxley, p. 259Google Scholar; Kent, , Hints pp. 35–6Google Scholar; letters, Price to Beaumont, , 24 04 1805, 17 August 1805, Coleorton MSS.Google Scholar
68 Price, to Abercorn, Lord, 21 12 1800, B.M. Add. MSS.Google Scholar
69 Gilpin, William, Observations on the Mountains and Lakes of Cumberland and Westmorland Vol II (London, 1786), p. 43.Google Scholar
70 Barrell, John, The Idea of Landscape and the Sense of Place 1730–1840: An Approach to the Poetry of John Clare (Cambridge, 1972) pp. 79–81.Google Scholar
71 Price, , Essay on the Picturesque, Vol I, p. 351.Google Scholar Gilpin had pronounced the Upper Wye from Hereford to Ross ‘tame’. Price's strictures on Gilpin were taken up by Fosbrooke, T.D. in his Wye Tour, or Gilpin on the Wye with Picturesque additions from Wheatley, Price & c (Ross, 1826).Google Scholar
72 Price, , Essay on the Picturesque, Vol I, pp. 193–4.Google Scholar
73 Price, to Beaumont, , 29 04 1803Google Scholar, Coleorton MSS; Price, to Abercorn, Lord, 31 05 1796Google Scholar, B.M. Add. MSS. Abercorn read the proofs of Price's Essay on the Picturesque and was intent to erase provincial language, for example ‘tump’ for which he substituted ‘mound’ even though Price considered it to be incorrect. Price, to Abercorn, , 2 02 1797Google Scholar; 11 March 1797.
74 Price, , Essay on the Picturesque, II, 342, 367–8, 340.Google Scholar
75 Ibid., II, 301–46.
76 Ibid., II, 116–28.
77 Price, to Beaumont, , 2 02 1798, Coleorton MSS.Google Scholar
78 Price, , Essay on the Picturesque, I, 240.Google Scholar
79 Ibid., III, 120.
80 Price, to Beaumont, , 23 04 1803, Coleorton MSS.Google Scholar
81 Price, to Aberdeen, Lord, 22 11 1821, B.M. Add. MSS.Google Scholar
82 Price, to Abercorn, Lord, 12 06 1796, B.M. Add. MSS.Google Scholar
83 Price, to Abercorn, Lord, 12 06 1796, B.M. Add. MSS.Google Scholar
84 Price, , Essay on the Picturesque, III, 130.Google Scholar
85 On the importance of foregrounds to Price see Daniels, Stephen, ‘The political iconography of woodland in later Georgian England’ in Cosgrove, Denis and Daniels, Stephen, The Iconography of Landscape (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
86 Wordsworth, William to SirBeaumont, George, 28 08 1811Google Scholar in de Selincourt, Ernest (ed.), The Letters of William and Dorothy Wordsworth: The Middle Years (Oxford, 1937), p. 467.Google Scholar
87 Price, , Essay on the Picturesque, I, 24 ff.Google Scholar
88 Ibid., I, 32–5.
89 Price, to Beaumont, , 24 07 1812, Coleorton MSS.Google Scholar
90 Carter, George, Goode, Patrick and Laurie, Kedrun, Humphry Repton Landscape Gardener 1752–1818 (Norwich, 1982), p. 153.Google Scholar
91 On this see Daniels, Stephen, ‘The political landscape’ in Carter, et al. , Humphry Repton, pp. 112–18.Google Scholar
92 Allentuck, , ‘Uvedale Price’, p. 73Google Scholar; Carter, et al. , Humphry Repton, p. 154.Google Scholar
93 Jones, E.L., ‘Industrial capital and landed investment’, in Jones, E.L., Agriculture and the Industrial Revolution (Oxford, 1974), pp. 160–83.Google Scholar
94 Repton, Humphry, Fragments on the Theory and Practice of Landscape Gardening (London, 1816), pp. 192–3.Google Scholar
95 Daniels, , ‘Political iconography of woodland’, pp. 70–2.Google Scholar
96 Loudon, J.C., A Treatise on Farming, Improving and Managing Country Residences, (London, 1806), III, 355.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by