Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:59:24.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law and the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Universities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Howard Schweber
Howard Schweber
Affiliation:
Department of GovernmentCornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the nineteenth century, American legal educators drew on the idea of “legal science” the claim that the study of law was similar to the study of the natural sciences. In this paper, I propose to examine the particular conceptions of “science” that were incorporated into that idea. The primary point of the paper is to argue that in antebellum America, a particular view of the natural sciences dominated public discourse, and it was this conception that was appropriated by contemporaneous legal scientists. Public discussions of natural science in lyceums, surveys, and journals, were carried out in a language grounded in the same religious commitments and the same normative conception of nature that drove the ideology of laissez-faire. Described under the rubric “Protestant Baconianism,” the approach was characterized by commitments to four elements: natural theology; a constrained version of Baconian inductivism; a belief in grand synthesis and proof by analogy; and claims of moral improvement. These elements were typical of the efforts of a particular influential circle of natural scientists and, similarly, of some of the more influential legal scientists in the antebellum period. This article examines the elements of the Protestant Baconian approach that were incorporated into Christopher Columbus Langdell's model of legal science in the 1870s, a model that continues to influence thinking about both legal education and jurisprudence to this day.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1999 , pp. 101 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassiz, Louis. 1850a. “Geographical Distribution of Animals.” The Christian Examiner and Religious Miscellany 48:181–204.Google Scholar
Agassiz, Louis. 1850b. “The Diversity of Origin of the Human Races.” The Christian Examiner and Religious Miscellany 49:110–145.Google Scholar
Agassiz, Louis. 1851. “Contemplations of God in the Kosmos.” The Christian Examiner and Religious Miscellany 50:1–17.Google Scholar
Andaneas, Johannes, et al. 1978 Proceedings from the Uppsala 1977 International Conference on Legal Science Today. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International Press.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1837. “Study of the Law.” Southern Literary Messenger 3:25–31.Google Scholar
Anonymous [1839] 1989. “The Legal Profession” The Law Reporter 1. In The Gladsome Light of Jurisprudence: Learning the Law in England and the United States in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, edited by Michael, H. Hoeflich. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Appel, Toby A. 1992. “A Scientific Career in the Age of Character: Jeffries Wyman and Natural History at Harvard.” In Science at Harvard University, edited by Clark, A. Elliott and Margaret, W. Rossiter, 96–120. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Ralph S. 1965. Scientific Societies in the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beach, Mark. 1972. “Was There a Scientific Lazzaroni?” In Nineteenth-Century American Science, a Reappraisal, edited by George, Daniels, 115–132. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William [1759] 1989. “A Discourse on the Study of the Law.” In The Gladsome Light of Jurisprudence: Learning the Law in England and the United States in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, edited by Michael, H. Hoeflich. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Maxwell. 1968. “Law vs. Politics: The Self-Image of the American Bar (1830–1860).” American Journal of Legal History 12:307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Maxwell. 1976. American Lawyers in a Changing Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Peter J. 1989. Evolution: the History of an Idea. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Theodore Dwight. 1977. Protestants in an Age of Science: The Baconian Ideal in Antebellum American Religious Thought. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Brazer, John. 1835. “A Review of an Argument in Support of Natural Religion.” Christian Examiner and Religious Miscellany 19:140–150.Google Scholar
Bruce, Robert V. 1988. The Launching of Modern American Science, 1846–1876. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bryson, W. Hamilton. 1982. Legal Education in Virginia, a Biographical Approach. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Burton, Warren. 1835. “Divine Agency in the Material Universe.” Christian Examiner and Religious Miscellany 18:314–327.Google Scholar
Butler, Benjamin F. 1835. Plan for the organization of a law faculty and for a system of instruction in legal science, in the University of the city of New York / prepared at the request of the council of said University. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bynum, W. F. 1994. Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin F. 1928. The Paradoxes of Legal Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul D. 1990. “The Revolutionary Idea of Legal Education.” William and Mary Quarterly 31:527–574.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul D. 1992. “The Theme of Early American Law Teaching: The Political Ethics of Francis Lieber.” Journal of Legal Education 42:339–398.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul D. 1995. “Hail, Langdell!” Law and Social Inquiry 20:691–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrington, Paul D. 1997. “Law as ‘The Common Thoughts of Men’: The Law Teaching and Judging of Thomas McIntyre Cooley.” Stanford Law Review 49:495–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Anthony. 1979. “The Birth of the Modern Law School.” American Journal of Legal History 23:329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, George H. 1968. American Science in the Age of Jackson. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, George H. 1971. Science in American Society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Daniels, George H. 1976. “The Process of Professionalization in American Science: the Emergent Period, 1820–1860.” Isis 58:161–166.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. 1995. “The Moral Economy of Science.” Osiris 10:3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupree, A. Hunter. 1959. Asa Gray. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, E. Donald. 1985. “The Evolutionary Tradition in Jurisprudence.” Columbia Law Review 85:38–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, James W. Jr., and David, J. Bodenhamer. 1986. “Regionalism and American Legal History: The Southern Experience.” Vanderbilt Law Review 39:539–567.Google Scholar
Everett, Edward. 1823. “Character of Lord Bacon.” North American Review 16:300–337.Google Scholar
Field, David Dudley. 1859. The Magnitude and Importance of Legal Science. An Address at the Opening of the Law School of the University of Chicago, September 31st 1859. New York: William J. Read.Google Scholar
Finkleman, Paul. 1985. “Exploring Southern Legal History.” North Carolina Law Review 64:77–116.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Daniel. 1994. “‘Yours for Science: The Smithsonian Institution's Correspondents and the Shape of Scientific Community in Nineteenth-Century America.” Isis 85:573–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, John C. 1959. The Death of Adam; Evolution and its Impact on Western Thought. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, Simon. 1834. A Discourse Pronounced at the Inauguration of the Author as Royall Professor of Law in Harvard University. Cambridge, Mass.: James Munroe.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, Simon. 1842. A Treatise on the Law of Evidence. Boston: Little and Brown.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, Simon. 1874. The Testimony of the Evangelists Examined by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice. New York: James Cockroft.Google Scholar
Guralnick, Stanley M. 1972. “Geology and Religion Before Darwin: The Case of Edward Hitchcock, Theologian and Geologist (1793–1864).” Isis 63:529–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guralnick, Stanley M. 1974. “Sources of Misconception on the Role of Science in the Nineteenth-Century American College.” Isis 65:352–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, Samuel. 1964. Efficiency and Uplift; Scientific Management in the Progressive Era, 1890–1920. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Thaddeus William. 1852. “Man and Nature.” Christian Examiner 53:116–118.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L. 1977.The Emergence of Professional Social Science. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, Walter B. 1961. “Nineteenth Century State Geological Surveys.” Isis 52:357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrickson, Walter B. 1973. “Science and Culture in the American Middle West.” Isis 64:326–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilliard, Francis. 1835. The Elements of Law: Being a Comprehensive Summary of American Civil Jurisprudence for the use of students, men of business, and general readers. Boston: Hilliard, Gray.Google Scholar
Hindle, Brook. 1956. The Pursuit of Science in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hoeflich, Michael. 1986. “Law & Geometry: Legal Science from Leibniz to Langdell.” American Journal of Legal History 30:95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoeflich, Michael. 1989. The Gladsome Light of Jurisprudence: Learning the Law in England and the United States in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, David. 1836. Course of Legal Study. Baltimore: Joseph Neal.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1978. Religion and Science in America, 1800–1860. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Mary Ann. 1992. “Engineering an Environment for Change: Bigelow, Peirce, and Early Nineteenth-Century Practical Education at Harvard.” In Science at Harvard University, edited by Clark, A. Elliott and Margaret, W. Rossiter. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Silas. 1842. An Introduction to Legal Science; Being a Concise and Familiar Treatise on Such Legal Topics as are Earliest Read by the Law Student should be Generally Taught in the Higher Seminaries of Learning; and Understood by Every Citizen, as a Part of a General and Business Education. New York: John S. Voorhies.Google Scholar
Kasson, John F. 1976. Civilizing the Machine: Technology and Republican Values in America, 1776–1900. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Konefsky, Alfred S. 1988. “Law and Culture in Antebellum Boston.” Stanford Law Review 40:1119–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langdell, Christopher Columbus. 1871. Cases on Contracts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Langdell, Christopher Columbus. 1880. A Summary of the Law of Contracts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
LaPiana, William. 1995. “Honor Langdell.” Law and Social Inquiry 20:761–764.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Philip J. 1972. “Edward Hitchcock: The Christian Geologist.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 116:21–34.Google Scholar
Levy, Babbette M. 1979. Cotton Mather. Boston: Twayne.Google Scholar
Lieber, Francis. 1858. “Address.” In Addresses of the Newly Appointed Professors of Columbia College, edited by William, Betts, 75–100. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lindahl, Lars. 1984. Theory of Legal science: proceedings of the Conference on Legal Theory and Philosophy of Science, Lund, Sweden, December 11–14, 1983. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Livingstone, David N. 1992. “A Geologist by Profession, a Geographer by Inclination: Nathaniel Southgate Shaler and Geography at Harvard.” In Science at Harvard University, edited by Clark, A. Elliott and Margaret, W. Rossiter, 146–166. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
Lurie, Edward. 1954. “Louis Agassiz and the Races of Man,” Isis 45:227–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, Leo. 1964. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayes, Daniel [1834] 1989. “An Address to the Students of Law in Transylvania University.” In The Gladsome Light of Jurisprudence: Learning the Law in England and the United States in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, edited by Michael, H. Hoeflich, 145–164. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Millhauser, Milton. 1959. Just Before Darwin: Robert Chambers and Vestiges. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, William E. 1975. Americanization of the Common Law:the Impact of Legal Change on Massachusetts Society, 1760–1830. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. 1977. Creation By Natural Law: Laplace's Nebular Hypothesis in American Thought. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. 1985. “Science and Religion.” Osiris 1:59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimann, Mathias. 1990. “Nineteenth Century German Legal Science.” Boston College Law Review 31:837–897.Google Scholar
Reingold, Nathan. 1976. Science in America Since 1820. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Roselius, Christian [1854] 1989. “Introductory Lecture at Tulane Law School.” In The Gladsome Light of Jurisprudence: Learning the Law in England and the United States in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries, edited by Michael, H. Hoeflich. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Charles. 1997. No Other Gods: On Science and American Social Thought. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, David. 1995. The Hidden Holmes: His Theory of Torts in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sharswood, George. 1870. Lectures Introductory to the Study of Law. Philadelphia: T and J. W. Johnson.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Steven. Forthcoming. The History of American Legal Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Salem Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Stephen A. 1981. “The Aristotelian Basis of English Law, 1450–1800.” New York University Law Review 56:18–59.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Bruce. 1992. “Harvard, MIT, and the Ideal Technical Education.” In Science at Harvard University, edited by Clark, A. Elliott and Margaret, W. Rossiter, 76–95. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, William Stanhope. 1815. A Comprehensive View of the Leading and Most Important Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion. New Brunswick, CT: Deare and Myer.Google Scholar
Stearns, Raymond P. 1946. “Colonial Fellows of the Royal Society of London, 1661–1788.” William & Mary Quarterly (3d Series) 3:208–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ste, Robert. 1983. Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1880s. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Arthur E. 1967. The Law at Harvard. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, John, Esq. 1882. The Reign of Law; Read Before the Literary Section of Vassar Brothers' Institute March 7, 1882. Poughkeepsie, NY: A. V. Haight.Google Scholar
Tucker, Nathan Beverley. 1834. ”Lecture on the Study of the Law; Being an Introduction to a Course of Lectures on that Subject in the College of William and Mary.” Southern Literary Messenger 1:145–54.Google Scholar
Tyler, Samuel. 1840. “The Baconian Philosophy.” Biblical Repertory and Princeton Review 12:350–377.Google Scholar
Wallis, S. T. 1872. Address Delivered Before the Law Class of the University of Maryland, June 15th, 1872. Baltimore, MD: John Murphy.Google Scholar
Welch, Claude. 1996. “Dispelling Some Myths About the Split Between Theology and Science in the Nineteenth Century.” In Religion and Science: History, Method, Dialogue, edited by Mark Richardson, W. and Wesley, J. Wildman, 29–40. New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 1993. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Law and the Inner Self. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Morton G. 1957. Social Thought in America: The Revolt Against Formalism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Reinhard. 1996. “Savigny's Legacy: Legal History, Comparative Law, and the Emergence of a European Legal Science.” Law Quarterly Review 112:576–605.Google Scholar
Zochert, Donald. 1974. “Science and the Common Man in Ante-Bellum America.” Isis 65:448–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar