Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:46:43.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Eric Winsberg
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceIndiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

Abstract

In its reconstruction of scientific practice, philosophy of science has traditionally placed scientific theories in a central role, and has reduced the problem of mediating between theories and the world to formal considerations. Many applications of scientific theories, however, involve complex mathematical models whose constitutive equations are analytically unsolvable. The study of these applications often consists in developing representations of the underlying physics on a computer, and using the techniques of computer simulation in order to learn about the behavior of these systems. In many instances, these computer simulations are not simple number-crunching techniques. They involve a complex chain of inferences that serve to transform theoretical structures into specific concrete knowledge of physical systems. In this paper I argue that this process of transformation has its own epistemology. I also argue that this kind of epistemology is unfamiliar to most philosophy of science, which has traditionally concerned itself with the justification of theories, not with their application. Finally, I urge that the nature of this epistemology suggests that the end results of some simulations do not bear a simple, straightforward relation to the theories from which they stem.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Essays 7 and 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. 1989. Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, A. 1986. The Neglect of Experiment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, R. 1988. Constructing Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1968. Language of Arts. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. J., and Smarr, L. L.. 1993. Supercomputing and the Transformation of Science. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1977. “The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science.” In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scient Tradition and Change, 178224. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laymon, R. 1985. “Idealizations and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation.” In Observation, Experiment and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, edited by Achinstein, P. and Hannaway, O., 147173. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Laymon, R. 1990. “Computer Simulations, Idealizations and Approximations.” PSA (Philosophy of Science Association) 2:519–34.Google Scholar
Moin, P. and Kim, J.. 1997. “Tackling turbulence with supercomputers.” Scientific American 276 (1):6268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, F. R. 1970. An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. L. 1990. “Beyond Numerical and Causal Accuracy: Expanding the Set of Justificational Criteria.” PSA 1:485499.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. L. 1992. “An Expanded Epistemology of Approximations.” PSA 1:154–66.Google Scholar
Shirayama, S., and Kuwahara, K.. 1990. “Flow Visualization in Computational Fluid Dynamics.” The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications 4(2):6680.Google Scholar
Smarr, L. 1985. “An approach to complexity.” Science 228:403408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilhelmson, R. B., et al. 1990. “A study of the evolution of a numerically modeled severe storm.” The International Journal of Supercomputer Applications 4(2):2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar