Article contents
Unifying the Ministry: The History of an Idea
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Extract
Church union schemes have for some years past tended to hinge upon a special service of ‘commissioning’ by which the ministries of various existing denominations should be unified. This pattern of unification, commonly associated with North India, has been attacked on the grounds that it gives ‘an impression of evasion and dishonesty’.1 It is held by many that it encourages some to believe that the commissioning is an ordination, and others to believe that it is not. And while this may be true of some present-day advocates of such schemes, it is not true of their origin. There was a quite clear theological interpretation to services for ‘unifying the ministry’, though in the opinion of this writer a false one. As we shall see, it was held that in a divided church there was no longer one ministry, but a number of parallel ministries, all defective until such time as they should be added together. It is the purpose of this survey to record the rise and fall of that idea amongst Anglicans, who have been particularly prone to it, over the past fifty years.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd 1967
References
page 50 note 1 Neill, Stephen, ‘Christian Union Today’, Horizons, Third Quarter 1964, Toronto, p. 6.Google Scholar
page 51 note 1 Capon, M. G., Towards Unity in Kenya, C.C.K., 1962, pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
page 51 note 2 The Lambeth Conferences (1867–1930), S.P.C.K., 1948, p. 39.Google Scholar
page 52 note 1 Quick, O. C., The Christian Sacraments, James Nisbet & Co., 1927, pp. 144–145.Google Scholar
page 52 note 2 Parker, T. M., Christianity and the State in the light of History, A. & C. Black, 1955, chapter VII, and especially p. 137.Google Scholar
page 52 note 3 e.g. Rahner, Karl, The Church and the Sacraments, Nelson, 1963, pp. 98–104.Google Scholar
page 52 note 4 Report of the Lambeth Conference of 1930, p. 116.
page 53 note 1 Doctrine in the Church of England, S.P.C.K., 1938, p. 111.Google Scholar
page 53 note 2 Report of the Lambeth Conference of 1948, S.P.C.K., p. 55.
page 53 note 3 Report of the Lambeth Conference of 1948, pp. 64–66.
page 54 note 1 The Historic Episcopate, ed. Carey, K. M., Dacre Press, A. & C. Black, 1954, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
page 54 note 2 The Historic Episcopate, pp. 122–3.
page 54 note 3 The Apostolic Ministry, ed. Kirk, K. E., Hodder, & Stoughton, , 1957 issue, p. xii.Google Scholar
page 55 note 1 Bayne, Stephen F. Jr., Ceylon, North India, Pakistan: A Study in Ecumencial Decision, S.P.C.K., 1960, p. 201.Google Scholar
page 55 note 2 Dr E. L. Mascall writing in the January 1962 issue of Theology, and in the 6th June 1963 issue of the Methodist Recorder.
page 55 note 3 Including Dr E. L. Mascall himself, writing in The Church Times, 2nd April 1965.
- 1
- Cited by