No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2009
Some years ago I published an article on this topic where more details can be found on what I may call analytic aspects concerning validity.page 1 But in the intervening years the attitude of many has indicated a willingness to consider change on this matter. Amongst Anglicans there seem fewer ministerial fundamentalists. Also a Roman Catholic has pointed out that in 1896 when Anglican orders were declared invalid Roman Catholic theologians were divided amongst themselves and today a leading Roman Catholic has said that he would like to see the matter reviewed.page 2 Indeed Roman references to ‘ecclesial communities’ and to penitence for their share in the divisions of the Church may be a hopeful sign and ease the way for a review of their attitude to validity and claim to be the one and only true church.page 3
page 175 note 1 Scottish Journal of Theology, vol. 15.2, June 1962, pp. 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 175 note 2 Hughes, J. J. in Journal of Ecumenical Studies, vol. 4.1.Google Scholar
page 175 note 3 Vatican II Decree of Ecumenism III. 14.
page 175 note 4 See Kittel, Wörterbuch; Ignatius ad Smyr. 8.
page 175 note 5 The Doctrines of Ministerial Order (Clark, 1940), pp. 229f, 249.Google Scholar
page 176 note 1 Leeming, B., Principles of Sacramental Theology (new ed. 1966), pp. 243, 270f.Google Scholar
page 176 note 2 G. W. L. Lampe, Lexicon of Patristic Greek; Greenslade, S. L., Schism in the Early Church (S.C.M. Press, 1953), esp. chs. 8, 9, 11.Google Scholar
page 176 note 3 Quick, O. C., The Christian Sacraments (1936 reprint), pp. 135ffGoogle Scholar; Swete, H. B., The Early History of the Church and Ministry (2nd ed. 1921), esp. chs. 3, 4.Google Scholar
page 176 note 4 op. cit., p. 178, and op. cit., pp. 144, ff
page 177 note 1 See The Old and the New in the Church, esp. Appendix 4 (S.C.M. Press, 1961).Google Scholar
page 177 note 2 Lacey, T. A., Unity and Schism (Mowbray, 1917)Google Scholar; O. C. Quick, op. cit.
page 177 note 3 e.g. Statements of Vatican II and those of Lambeth Conferences.
page 177 note 4 Theology, Oct. 1952, and Scottish Journal of Theology, June 1962.
page 177 note 5 Davies, J. G., The Spirit, the Church and the Sacraments (Faith Press, 1954), pp. 166 and 176.Google Scholar
page 177 note 6 Panagolous, J. in Journal of Ecumenical Studies, IV. I, pp. 38, 41.Google Scholar
page 178 note 1 Quick, op. cit., p. 144.
page 178 note 2 op. cit., p. 146.
page 178 note 3 pp. 13Iff, 154ff.
page 178 note 4 RevWhite, G., Scottish Journal of Theology, vol. 20.I, March 1967, pp. 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 178 note 5 Quick, op. cit., pp. 143ff, and Davies, op. cit., pp. 175f 191f.
page 178 note 6 Lambeth Conference Appeal 1920.
page 178 note 7 Davies, op. cit., p. 172.
page 179 note 1 W. Temple, Address to Canterbury Convocation May 1943, and Davies, op. cit., p. 173f.
page 179 note 2 Quick, op. cit., p. 144.
page 179 note 3 See also my article in Scottish Journal of Theology, vol. 15.2, June 1962, p. 128f.Google Scholar
page 179 note 4 Peck, A. L., Anglicanism and Episcopacy, 1958, p. 84.Google Scholar
page 180 note 1 For detail e.g. Hebert's, A. G. chapter in theApostolic Ministry, 1940Google Scholar; Manson, T. W., The Ministry of the Church (Westminster Press, U.S.A., 1948)Google Scholar; Archbishop Temple, op. cit.
page 180 note 2 Moberly, G., The Administration of the Holy Spirit in the Body of Christ (Parker, 1868), esp. ch. 5. 1 Cor. 12 passim, 2 Tim. 1.6.Google Scholar
page 180 note 3 Kittel, op. cit., in loc.; e.g. 1 Cor. 1.8.
page 180 note 4 Oman, J., Grace and Personality (C.U.P., 1931).Google Scholar
page 180 note 5 Davies, op. cit., pp. 173f 177; Ainslie, op. cit., p. 228; Quick, op. cit., p. 243f.
page 180 note 6 op. cit., p. 278.
page 181 note 1 Smith, H. Maynard, Frank, Bishop of Zanzibar (S.P.C.K., 1926), p. 234.Google Scholar
page 182 note 1 Covenant and Reconciliation (Mowbray, 1967), p. 5.Google Scholar
page 182 note 2 cf. Wiles, M. F., The Making of Christian Doctrine (C.U.P., 1967), pp. 6f, 9, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar