Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:45:44.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in seed quality during seed development and maturation in tomato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

I. Demir  and
R. H. Ellis
I. Demir
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 2AT, UK
R. H. Ellis*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG6 2AT, UK
*
* Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Changes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seed quality were monitored during seed development and maturation in glasshouse experiments in 2 years. The end of the seedfilling period (mass maturity) occurred 35–41 d after anthesis (differing among trusses) in 1989 and 42 d after anthesis in 1990. Seed moisture contents at this developmental stage were 53–72% (wet basis), while the onset of ability to germinate (during 21-d tests at 20°/30°C) and the onset of tolerance to rapid enforced desiccation occurred just before (1990) or just after (1989) mass maturity. In 1989, seed quality was assessed primarily by seedling size in a glasshouse experiment; maximum mean seedling dry weight 25 d after sowing was not achieved until 24–40 d after mass maturity. In 1990, seed quality was assessed primarily by germination following storage; maximum normal germination after 35 d in storage at 40 °C with 14 ± 0.5% moisture content was attained 23 d after mass maturity, but with little difference among seed lots harvested 10 d earlier or up to 30 d later. The results contradict the hypothesis that maximum seed quality is attained at the end of the seed-filling period and that seed viability and vigour begin to decline immediately thereafter.

Keywords

Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.seed developmentseed qualityseed storageseed weightseedling size
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 81 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argerich, C.A. and Bradford, K.J. (1989) The effects of priming and ageing on seed vigour in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany 40, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishnoi, W.R. (1974) Physiological maturity of seeds in Triticale hexaploid L. Crop Science 14, 819–821.Google Scholar
Coolbear, P., Francis, A. and Grierson, D. (1984) The effect of low temperature pre-sowing treatment on the germination performance and membrane integrity of artificially aged tomato seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 35, 1609–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deijode, S.D. (1983) Studies on vigour and viability of seeds at different stages of fruit development in tomato. Singapore Journal of Primary Industries 2, 106–109.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.H., Hong, T.D. and Roberts, E.H. (1987) The development of desiccation-tolerance and maximum seed quality during maturation in six grain legumes. Annals of Botany 59, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.H. and Pieta Filho, C. (1992) Seed development and cereal seed longevity. Seed Science Research 2, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J.F. (1972) Seed storage longevity, pp. 145–245 in Kozlowski, T.T. (Ed.) Seed biology, Vol. III, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hoagland, D.R. (1920) Optimum nutrient solutions for plants. Science 52, p. 562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Seed Testing Association (1985a) International rules for seed testing. Rules 1985. Seed Science and Technology 13, 299–355.Google Scholar
International Seed Testing Association (1985b) International rules for seed testing. Annexes 1985. Seed Science and Technology 13, 356–513.Google Scholar
Kameswara Rao, N., Appa Rao, S., Mengesha, M.H. and Ellis, R.H. (1991) Longevity of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum R.Br) seeds harvested at different stages of maturity. Annals of Applied Biology 119, 97–103.Google Scholar
Kwon, O.S. and Bradford, K.J. (1987) Tomato seed development and quality as influenced by preharvest treatment with ethephon. HortScience 22, 588–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odland, M.L. (1938) Observations on dormancy in vegetable seed. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 35, 562–565.Google Scholar
Pieta Filho, C. and Ellis, R.H. (1991a) The development of seed quality in spring barley in four environments. I. Germination and longevity. Seed Science Research 1, 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieta Filho, C. and Ellis, R.H. (1991b) The development of seed quality in spring barley in four environments. II. Field emergence and seedling size. Seed Science Research 1, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasyad, D.A., Van Sanford, D.A. and TeKrony, D.M. (1990) Changes in seed viability and vigour during wheat seed maturation. Seed Science and Technology 18, 259–267.Google Scholar
Suzuki, J. (1969) Studies on the maturity and longevity of solanaceous plant seeds. Japan Journal of Breeding 19, 149–158.Google Scholar
TeKrony, D.M., Egli, D.B. and Philips, A.D. (1980) Effect of field weathering on the viability and vigour of soybean seed. Agronomy Journal 72, 749–753.Google Scholar
Villiers, T.A. (1973) Ageing and the longevity of seeds in field conditions, pp. 265–288 in Heydecker, W. (Ed.) Seed ecology. London, Butterworths.Google Scholar
Villiers, T.A. (1974) Seed ageing: chromosome stability and extended viability of seeds stored fully imbibed. Plant Physiology 53, 875–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiers, T.A. and Edgecumbe, D.J. (1975) On the causes of seed deterioration in dry storage. Seed Science and Technology 3, 761–774.Google Scholar