Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:22:36.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of priming-induced nuclear replication activity on storability of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) seed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

F. Saracco ,
R. J. Bino ,
J. H. W. Bergervoet  and
S. Lanteri
F. Saracco
Affiliation:
DI. VA.P.R.A., Plant Breeding and Seed Production, via P. Giuria 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
R. J. Bino
Affiliation:
CPRO-DLO, Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
J. H. W. Bergervoet
Affiliation:
CPRO-DLO, Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
S. Lanteri*
Affiliation:
DI. VA.P.R.A., Plant Breeding and Seed Production, via P. Giuria 15, 10126, Turin, Italy
*
*Correspondence
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of two priming treatments in PEG solutions on nuclear replication stages of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) embryos were evaluated using flow cytometry. Priming at −1.1 MPa for 10 d induced almost 40% of nuclei in the embryo root tips to enter the synthetic phase of nuclear division, while no DNA synthesis occurred during 6 d at−1.5 MPa and in less than 10% of the nuclei at 10 d. Both priming treatments effectively increased seed performance. A decrease of 2.7 d in mean germination time (MGT) was observed after priming in PEG solution at −1.1 MPa, while the treatment at−1.5 MPa lowered the MGT by 2.1 d. Primed and untreated seeds were subjected to controlled deterioration treatments by exposure to 45°C after equilibration at 75% RH. Both osmotic treatments considerably lowered seed tolerance to adverse storage conditions as compared with untreated seeds. However, seeds in which DNA replication was induced by priming were more sensitive to controlled deterioration than seeds in which priming did not induce nuclei to enter the synthetic phase. This could be a consequence of a higher DNA content, which is a more vulnerable target for mutation inducing factors. Alternatively the increased sensitivity could be a consequence of their more advanced progress in germinative events, making seeds less resistant to deteriorative factors imposed during storage. On the whole, from the present results it appears that the nucleic acid DNA content of the embryo only plays an additive role in influencing seed storability.

Keywords

Capsicum annuumDNA replicationflow cytometryprimingseed storability
Type
Research Papers
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 25 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarado, A.D. and Bradford, K.J. (1988) Priming and storage of tomato (Lycopersicon lycopersicum) seeds. I. Effects of storage temperature on germination rate and viability. Seed Science and Technology 16, 601–612.Google Scholar
Argerich, C.A., Bradford, K.J. and Tarquis, A.M. (1989) The effects of priming and ageing on resistance to deterioration of tomato seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 40, 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bino, R.J., Lanteri, S., Verhoeven, H.A. and Kraak, H.L. (1993) Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in seed tissues. Annals of Botany 72, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearman, P.A., Brocklehurst, P.A. and Drew, R.L.K. (1986) Effects of osmotic priming and ageing on onion seed germination. Annals of Applied Biology 108, 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell'Aquila, A., Savino, G. and De Leo, P. (1978) Metabolic changes induced by hydration-dehydration presowing treatment in wheat embryo. Plant and Cell Physiology 19, 348–354.Google Scholar
Deltour, R. (1985) Nuclear activation during early germination of the higher plant embryo. Journal of Cell Science 75, 43–83.Google Scholar
Georghiou, K., Thanos, C.A. and Passam, H.C. (1987) Osmoconditioning as a means of counteracting the ageing of pepper seeds during high-temperature storage. Annals of Botany 60, 279–285.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, G., Cruz, F., Moreno, J., González-Hernández, V.A. and Vázquez-Ramos, J.M. (1993) Natural and artificial seed ageing in maize: germination and DNA synthesis. Seed Science Research 3, 279–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISTA (1985) International rules for seed testing. Rules 1985. Seed Science and Technology 13, 299–335.Google Scholar
Koopman, M.J.F. (1963) Results of a number of storage experiments conducted under controlled conditions (other than agricultural seeds). Proceedings International Seed Testing Association 28, 853–860.Google Scholar
Koostra, P.T. and Harrington, J.F. (1969) Biochemical effects of age on membranal lipids of Cucumis sativus L. seeds. Proceedings International Seed Testing Association 34, 329–340.Google Scholar
Lanteri, S. and Belletti, P. (1990) Frequency of chromosome aberrations induced during storage in Pinus nigra Arnold seeds. Journal of Genetics & Breeding 44, 281–290.Google Scholar
Lanteri, S., Kraak, L., De Vos, C.H.R. and Bino, R.J. (1993) Effects of osmotic preconditioning on nuclear replication activity in seeds of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Physiologia Plantarum 89, 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanteri, S., Saracco, F., De Vos, C.H.R. and Bino, R.J. (1993) Effects of osmotic preconditioning on nuclear replication activity in seeds of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L.). Seed Science Research 4, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, S., Coolbear, P. and Hampton, J.G. (1991) Hydration-dehydration treatments to protect or repair stored “Karamu” wheat seeds. Crop Science 31, 822–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, D.J. (1983) Biochemical control systems operating in early hours of germination. Canadian Journal of Botany 61, 3568–3577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruzzelli, L. and Carella, G. (1983) The effect of ageing conditions on less of viability in wheat (T.durum). Journal of Experimental Botany 34, (139), 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savino, G., Haigh, P.M. and De Leo, P. (1979) Effects of presoaking upon seed vigour and viability during storage. Seed Science and Technology 7, 57–64.Google Scholar
Saxena, P.K. and King, J. (1989) Isolation of nuclei and their transplantation into plant protoplast. pp 328–342in Bajaj, Y.P.S. (Ed.) Biotechnology in agricultural and forestry. Plant protoplast and genetic engineering. New York, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Sybenga, J. (1972) General cytogenetics. pp 34–56. New York, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tarquis, A.M. and Bradford, K.J. (1992) Prehydration and priming treatments that advance germination also the rate of deterioration of lettuce seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 43 (248), 307–317.Google Scholar
Yanishevsky, R.M. and Stein, G.H. (1981) Regulation of cell cycle in eukaryotic cells. International Review of Cytology 69, 223–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed