Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:59:37.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Smoke derived from burnt vegetation stimulates germination of arable weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

S.W. Adkins  and
N.C.B. Peters
S.W. Adkins*
Affiliation:
School of Land and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
N.C.B. Peters
Affiliation:
Institute of Arable Crops Research, Long Ashton Research Station, Department of Agricultural Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS41 9AF, UK
*
*Correspondence Fax: +61 7 3365 1177 Email: s.adkins@mailbox.uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A commercially available smoke-water solution (Seed Starter®) stimulated the germination of caryopses and intact florets of Avena fatuaL. The solution was most effective when diluted (5–50%) and presented to intact or dehulled grain that had received a short period of dry after-ripening. It was less effective when applied at full strength or to grains that had been freshly harvested. The same stimulatory effect was observed in partly after-ripened caryopses of nine different wild oat biotypes obtained from three different cropping regions of the world. When freshly harvested caryopses were re-tested with the commercial solution (100%) for just 7 days prior to placement on to distilled water, a much higher germination percentage was possible than seen with continuous smoke-water incubation. The stimulatory ability of smoke water was more closely matched to that of gibberellic acid than to potassium nitrate, which had little or no effect on freshly harvested caryopses. The smoke-water solution (5–100%) was tested on the germination of 18 other cool temperate arable weed species. All monocotyledonous species tested (viz. Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana L., Alopecurus myosuroides, Sorghum halepense, Phalaris paradoxa) responded positively, while those of the dicotyledonous species were either strongly stimulated (≥40%stimulation Malva neglecta), moderately stimulated (≥20% stimulation Galium aparine, Veronica persica), slightly stimulated (Polygonum persicaria, P. pennsylvanicum, Fallopia convolvulus), unaffected (P. aviculare, Sinapis arvensis, Heracleum sphondylium, Angelica sylvestris, Mercurialis annua, Veronica hederifolia) or inhibited (Lamium purpureum). The optimal concentrations required to stimulate germination of the monocotyledonous species were similar to those observed for A. fatua (5–10%). However, for the dicotyledonous species slightly stronger solutions were required (10–20%). When the unaffected species were retested using a 10-day pre-chilling treatment, smoke water showed a small promotive response in three (S. arvensis, P. aviculare and V. hederifolia) of the six species. When four different smoke-water solutions (Seed Starter®, ®, charred-wood solution and wheat-straw solution) were tested on two representative species (A. fatua and M. neglecta), three formulations were effective in promoting the germination of both species, while the fourth (charred-wood solution) was only active on A. fatua. The active concentrations were different for the four solutions. Three solutions were active in the 2–20% dilution range, while the fourth (®) was only active in the 1–2% dilution range and was inhibitory at higher concentrations. These observations are discussed in the context that smoke may play an important ecological role in the management and control of introduced weeds in native and arable communities.

Keywords

Avena fatuagerminationseed dormancysmoke waterweeds
Type
Research Article
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 213 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, S.W., Symons, S.J. and Simpson, G.M. (1988) The physiological basis of seed dormancy in Avena fatua VIII. Action of malonic acid. Physiologia Plantarum 72, 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, S.W., Davidson, P.J., Matthew, L., Navie, S.C., Wills, D.A., Taylor, I.N. and Bellairs, S.M. (2000) Smoke and germination of arable and rangeland weeds. pp. 347–358in Black, M.; Bradford, K.V.; Vázquez- Ramos, J. (Eds) Seed biology: Advances and applications. Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Baldwin, I.T., Staszak-Kozinski, L. and Davidson, R. (1994) Up in smoke I. Smoke-derived germination cues for postfire annual, Nicotiana attenuata Torr. ex. Watson. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 2345–2371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, B.J.M., van Staden, J., Granger, J.E. and Brown, N.A.C. (1994) Plant-derived smoke and smoke extracts stimulate seed germination of the fire-climax grass Themeda triandra. Environmental and Experimental Botany 34, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D.T. (1999) Turner Review No. 1 – The process of germination in Australian species. Australian Journal of Botany 47, 475–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N.A.C. and van Staden, J. (1997) Smoke as a germination cue: A review. Plant Growth Regulation 22, 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P.J. and Adkins, S.W. (1997) Germination of Triodia grass seed by plant derived smoke. pp. 29–30in Proceedings of the 10th biennial Australian rangelands conference, 12 1997, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia.Google Scholar
De Lange, J.H. and Boucher, C. (1990) Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae) I. Plant-derived smoke as a seed germination cue. South African Journal of Botany 56(6), 700–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lange, J.H. and Boucher, C. (1993) Autecological studies on Audouinia capitata (Bruniaceae). VIII. Role of fire in regeneration. South African Journal of Botany 59, 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, K.W. and Roche, S. (1995) The role of combustion products (smoke) in stimulating ex-situ and in-situ germination of Western Australian plants. Proceedings of the International Plant Propagation Society 45, 53–56.Google Scholar
Dixon, K.W., Roche, S. and Pate, J.S. (1995) The promotive effect of smoke derived from burnt native vegetation on seed germination of Western Australian plants. Oecologia 101, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, L.C. and Cohn, M.A. (2000) Seed dormancy in red rice (Oryza sativa) XI. Commercial liquid smoke elicits germination. Seed Science Research 10, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewes, F.E., Smith, M.T. and van Staden, J. (1995) The effect of a plant-derived smoke extract on the germination of light sensitive lettuce seed. Plant Growth Regulation 16, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton-Warburton, L.M. (1998) A smoke-induced alteration of the sub-testa cuticle in seeds of the post-fire recruiter, Emmenanthe penduliflora Bench. (Hydrophyllaceae). Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 1317–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enright, N.J., Goldblum, D., Ata, P. and Ashton, D.H. (1997) The independent effects of heat, smoke and ash on emergence of seedlings from the soil seed bank of a healthy Eucalyptus woodland in Grampians (Gariwerd) National Park, western Victoria. Australian Journal of Ecology 22, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espelie, K.E., Davis, R.W. and Kolattukudy, P.E. (1980) Composition, ultrastructure and function of the cutinand suberin-containing layers in the leaf, fruit peel, juice sac and inner seed coat of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macfed.) Planta 149, 498–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jäger, A.K., Light, M.E. and van Staden, J. (1996) Effects of source of plant material and temperature on the production of smoke extracts that promote germination of light sensitive lettuce seeds. Environmental and Experimental Botany 36, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, J.E. and Fotheringham, C.J. (1998a) Mechanism of smoke-induced seed germination in a post-fire chaparral annual. Journal of Ecology 86, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, J.E. and Fotheringham, C.J. (1998b) Smoke-induced seed germination in California chaparral. Ecology 79, 2320–2336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, J.E. and Fotheringham, C.J. (2000) Role of fire in regeneration from seed. pp. 311–330in Fenner, M. (Ed.) Seeds, the ecology of regeneration in plant communities (2nd edition). Wallingford, UK, CABI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, J.E. and Keeley, S.C. (1987) Role of fire in the germination of chaparral herbs and suffrutescents. Madrono 34, 240–249.Google Scholar
Keeley, J.E., Morton, B.A., Pedrosa, A. and Trotter, P. (1985) Role of allelopathy, heat and charred wood in the germination of chaparral herbs and suffrutescents. Journal of Ecology 73, 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, S.C. and Pizzorno, M. (1986) Charred wood stimulated germination of two fire-following herbs of the California chaparral and the role of hemicellulose. American Journal of Botany 73, 1289–1297.Google Scholar
Maga, J.A. (1988) Smoke in food processing. Boca Raton, CRC Press.Google Scholar
Roche, S., Dixon, K.W. and Pate, J.S. (1997) Seed ageing and smoke: partner cues in the amelioration of seed dormancy in selected Australian native species. Australian Journal of Botany 45, 783–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakuma, H., Munakata, S. and Sugawara, S. (1980) Volatile products of cellulose pyrolysis. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 45, 443–451.Google Scholar
Thomas, T.H. and van Staden, J. (1995) Dormancy break of celery (Apium graveolens L.) seeds by plant-derived smoke extract. Plant Growth Regulation 17, 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, M.A., Thomas, T.H. and Peters, N.C.B. (1999) The promotive effect of combustion products from plant vegetation on the release of seeds from dormancy. Plant Growth Regulation 28, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Venter, H.A. and Esterhuizen, A.D. (1988) The effect of factors associated with fire on seed germination of Erica sessiliflora and Erica hebecalyx (Ericaceae). South African Journal of Botany 54, 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Staden, J., Drewes, F.E. and Brown, N.A.C. (1995) Some chromatographic characteristics of germination stimulants in plant-derived smoke extracts. Plant Growth Regulation 17, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar