Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:14:52.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Statistical considerations in seed purity testing for transgenic traits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2007

Kirk M. Remund*
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, 800 North Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63167USA
Doris A. Dixon
Affiliation:
Monsanto Company, 800 North Lindbergh Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63167USA
Deanne L. Wright
Affiliation:
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 7300 N.W. 62nd Avenue, Johnston, Iowa, 50131-1004USA
Larry R. Holden
Affiliation:
Sielken, Inc., Bryan, Texas, 77802USA
*
*Correspondence: Fax: +1 314-693-6673 Email: Kirk.M.Remund@monsanto.com

Abstract

Recent advances in agricultural biotechnology have produced many new crop varieties with valuable transgenic traits. These varieties are being, and will continue to be, marketed alongside conventional non-transgenic varieties. As a result, seed purity in commercial seed lots is of particular importance to both seed consumers and seed producers. A key step in the seed production process is the design of sampling and testing procedures used to evaluate seed lot purity. However, due to uncertainties in such methods, there is always a risk of incorrectly rejecting or accepting a seed lot. This paper discusses factors that should be considered when designing and implementing seed purity testing procedures to manage this misclassification risk – especially with regard to the presence or absence of transgenic traits. Many sources of uncertainty in both seed lot sampling and in the assay methods are described, and recommendations for reducing their impact are provided. This paper also explains the statistical concepts of misclassification risk as it affects seed producers and seed consumers. Sampling plans and formulas for determining the sample sizes necessary to control these misclassification errors when accepting or rejecting seed lots are also provided. Both simple, single-stage testing plans and the, often more efficient, double-stage testing plans are described. Testing seed pools rather than individual seeds is introduced as another way of adding efficiency to the testing process. Formulas are given for determining, from a seed sample, the confidence limits for the actual purity level of a commercial lot.

Type
Perspectives in Seed Technology
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOSA (1998) Rules for testing seeds. Columbus, Ohio, Association of Official Seed Analysts.Google Scholar
Cochran, W.G. (1977) Sampling techniques (3rd edition). New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hermanson, G.T., Mallia, A.K. and Smith, P.K. (1992) Immobilized affinity ligand techniques. San Diego, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. and White, T.J. (1990) PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. San Diego, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
ISTA (1999) International rules for seed testing rules 1999. Zurich, Switzerland, International Seed Testing Association.Google Scholar
Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. and Kemp, A.W. (1993) Univariate discrete distributions (2nd edition). New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Lindley, D.V. (1970) Introduction to probability and statistics from a Bayesian viewpoint, part 2. Inference (1st edition). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, M. M. (1992) Immunochemical protocols. Methods in molecular biology, Vol 10. Totowa, NJ, Humana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, D.C. (1997) Introduction to statistical quality control (3rd edition). New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
USDA Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (1995a) Mechanical sampling systems handbook. Washington DC, USDA. (http://www.usda. gov/gipsa)Google Scholar
USDA Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (1995b) Grain inspection handbook: Book 1. Washington DC, USDA. (http://www.usda.gov/gipsa)Google Scholar