Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:29:39.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Subjectivities from the Soviet North

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2019

Andy Bruno
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article develops the concept of “Soviet environmental subjectivity.” Taking a theoretical step toward comparative political ecology and neo-materialism, it makes the case that engagement with the natural environment comprised a potent, but underappreciated, determinant of Soviet subjectivity. To elaborate this argument, the article examines the life stories of three individuals who spent time in a common region in the far north: ornithologist Oleg Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, geologist Leonid Potemkin, and aspiring ballerina turned technician and prisoner Inna Tartakovskaia. Their lives reveal certain distinguishing features of Soviet environmental subjectivities, including a common desire to both exploit and protect the environment and a tendency for the state's punitive use of harsh natural conditions to alter subjective experiences. Furthermore, the very different paths of these individuals—one became an environmentalist, one defended the Soviet treatment of the natural world, and one did not actively engage in environmental politics—indicate the possible pervasiveness of environmental subjectivities in the Soviet Union.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , Spring 2019 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work has benefited from many eyes and much support. I would like to thank Anatoly Pinsky, Alexey Golubov, Francine Hirsch, Kathryn Ciancia, David McDonald, Piotr Puchalski, Karen Petrone, Harriet Murav, Sarah Frohardt-Lane, and the participants in the Midwest Russian History Workshop in March 2017 for their feedback on this work. Various pieces of this research and writing occurred over a long time period. Therefore, I would like to acknowledge the generous funding from the Fulbright Program, the Social Science Research Council, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the German Historical Institute, the National Science Foundation (NSF ARC 0922651), Florida State University, the University of Tübingen, Northern Illinois University, and a Fellowship in Aerospace History from the History of Science Society and the National Aeronautical and Space Administration.

References

1. Agrawal, Arun, Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects (Durham, 2005), 7, 164–65Google Scholar.

2. Stoddart, Mark C. J., Making Meaning out of Mountains: The Political Ecology of Skiing (Vancouver, 2012), 108Google Scholar. Here Stoddard references: Thrift, Nigel, “I Just Don’t Know What Got into Me: Where is the Subject?” Subjectivity 22, no. 1 (May 2008): 82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3. Halfin, Igal, Terror in my Soul: Communist Autobiographies on Trial (Cambridge, Mass., 2003)Google Scholar; Halfin, Igal, Red Autobiographies: Initiating the Bolshevik Self (Seattle, 2011)Google Scholar; Hellbeck, Jochen, Revolution on My Mind: Writing a Diary under Stalin (Cambridge, Mass., 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Space limitations prevent me from being bibliographic in my citations in this article.

4. For a recent contribution, see Pinsky, Anatoly, ed., Posle Stalina: Pozdnesovetskaia sub΄ektivnost΄, 1953–1985 gg. (Saint Petersburg, 2018)Google Scholar.

5. Widdis, Emma, “Socialist Senses: Film and the Creation of Soviet Subjectivity,” Slavic Review 71, no 3 (Fall 2012): 590–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Draskoczy, Julie, Belomor: Criminality and Creativity in Stalin’s Gulag (Boston, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Alexey Golubev, “Elemental Materialism: Objectifying Power and Selfhood in the Late USSR, 1961–1991” (PhD diss., University of British Columbia, 2016), 23; McQuillen, Colleen, “Human Adaptation in Late-Soviet Environmental Science Fiction,” in McQuillen, Colleen and Vaingurt, Julia, eds., The Human Reimagined: Posthumanism in Russia (Boston, 2018), 102Google Scholar.

7. Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford, 2005)Google Scholar; Bennett, Jane, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Durham, 2010)Google Scholar; LeCain, Timothy, The Matter of History: How Things Create the Past (Cambridge, Eng., 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Latour, Reassembling the Social, 217.

9. Ibid., 218.

10. Scholars of state-socialist countries have already shown how materials in the environment can function as actors affecting economic activities and politics. This essay brings this capacity for influence into the realm of the personal. See Gille, Zsuzsa, “From Nature as Proxy to Nature as Actor,” Slavic Review 68, no. 1 (Spring 2009): 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gille, Zsuzsa, From the Cult of Waste to the Trash Heap of History: The Politics of Waste in Socialist and Postsocialist Hungary (Bloomington, 2007)Google Scholar; Bruno, Andy, The Nature of Soviet Power: An Arctic Environmental History (Cambridge, Eng., 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bathsheba Demuth, “The Power of Place: Ideology and Ecology in the Bering Strait, 1848–1988” (PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, 2016).

11. Berlin, Valerii, “Khraniteli prirodnogo naslediia,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 3–7Google Scholar; Berlin, V. E., “O. I. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii—ekolog i kraeved (k 100-letiiu dnia rozhdeniia),” Tretie Ushakovskie Chteniia: Spornik nauchnykh statei (Murmansk, 2006), 283–89Google Scholar; Weiner, Douglas, Models of Nature: Ecology, Conservation, and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia (Bloomington, 1988), 16–22Google Scholar.

12. Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind; Pinsky, Anatoly, “The Diaristic Form and Subjectivity under Khrushchev,” Slavic Review 73, no. 4 (Winter 2014): 805–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. Oleg Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Dnevnik iz Petrovki (1917),” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 2 (1998), at http://www.arctic.org.ru/1998/2_6_98.htm (last accessed August 20, 2018); Oleg Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Dnevnik iz Petrovki (1918),” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 2 (1998), at http://www.arctic.org.ru/1998/2_7_98.htm (last accessed August 20, 2018); O. I. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Khibinskii dnevnik,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 99–149.

14. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Khibinskii dnevnik,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 104, 105; Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Dnevnik iz Petrovki (1918),” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 2 (1998).

15. Weiner, Models of Nature.

16. Kreps, German, “Dikii severnyi oleń na Koĺskom poluostrove i proekt organizatsii laplandskogo zapovednika,” Karelo-Murmanskii Krai 6, no. 10–11 (October-November 1928): 37Google Scholar.

17. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Khibinskii dnevnik,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 139.

18. Ibid., 148.

19. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Murmanskoi oblasti (GAMO), fond (f.) 773 (Lichnyi fond V. I. Kondrikova, 1929–1936), opis΄ (op.). 1, delo (d.) 6, ll. 165–72, 223 (Perepiska po sluzhebnym voprosam V. I. Kondrikova, July-December 1931); GAMO, f. 773, op. 1, d. 2, l. 171 (Perepiska po sluzhebnym voprosam V. I. Kondrikova, 1929–1930); GAMO, f. 773, op. 1, d. 51, ll. 194–95, 523 (Perepiska po sluzhebnym voprosam V. I. Kondrikova, January 9, 1935–April 30, 1935).

20. A. Mikhailov, “Bobry v Laplandii,” Leningradskaia Pravda, April 27, 1935.

21. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii (GARF), f. A-358 (Glavnoe upravlenie okhotnich́ego khoziaistva i zapovednikov pri sovet ministrov RSFSR i ego predshestvenniki, 1933–1990), op. 2, d. 111, ll. 1–18, 20–34 (Ochet Laplandskogo goszapovednika o nauchno-issledovateĺskoi rabote za 1938 g.); Valerii Berlin “Suprugi-uchenye,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 153; GARF, f. A-358, op. 2, d. 32, ll. 10, 18–24 (Materialy po istorii i organizatsii Laplandskogo goszapovednika, November 1933-September 1940).

22. Bianki, V. V., “Naturalist-ekolog Oleg Izmailovich Semenov-Tian-Shanskii (1906–1990): k 100-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia,” Russkii ornitologicheskii zhurnal 15, no. 335 (2006): 1012Google Scholar.

23. Berlin, “Khraniteli prirodnogo naslediia,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 7.

24. GARF, f. A-358, op. 4, d. 1521, l. 21 (Vzaimotnosheniia dikogo i domashnogo severnogo olenia, 1958–1962).

25. Ibid., 72.

26. Ibid., 85; O. A. Makarova, “Dikii severnyi oleń Koĺskogo poluostrova v kontse XX—nachale XXI vekov,” Nauka i biznes na Murmane, no. 4 (August 2003): 43; Douglas Weiner, A Little Corner of Freedom: Russian Nature Protection from Stalin to Gorbachev (Berkeley, 1999), 125–26, 467.

27. For an account of this episode, see Bruno, Andy, “A Tale of Two Reindeer: Pastoralism and Preservation in the Soviet Arctic,” REGION: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia 6, no. 2 (2017): 251–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, O., Laplandskii gosudarstvennyi zapovednik (nauchno-populiarnyi ocherk) (Murmansk, 1960), 7–8Google Scholar; Weiner, A Little Corner of Freedom, 128–29, 232, 258.

29. GARF, f. A-358, op. 5, d. 101, l. 9 (Doklady direktorov zapovednikov i ikh zamestitelei po nauchnoi chasti na Moskovskom soveshchanii, November 21–24, 1960).

30. Ibid., 12.

31. Ibid., 2, 9, 11–12.

32. Iskin, Ruth E., “In the Light of Images and the Shadow of Technology: Lacan, Photography and Subjectivity,” Discourse 19, no. 3 (Spring 1997): 60Google Scholar.

33. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Dnevnik iz Petrovki (1918),” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 2 (1998); Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Khibinskii dnevnik,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 99–149.

34. GARF, f. A-358, op. 4, d. 1640, ll. 1–86 (Vliianie promyshlennogo zagriazneniia na vidovoi sostav, rasprostranie, rost, i razvitie lishainikov v raione g. Monchegorska, 1973–1976); Barcan, Valery, “Nature and Origin of Multicomponent Aerial Emissions of the Copper-Nickel Smelter Complex,” Environmental International 28, no. 6 (December 2002): 451–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

35. O. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii and V. Kriuchkov, “Visit dym nad zapovednikom,” Pravda (October 10, 1980).

36. Ibid.

37. V. E. Berlin, “O. I. Semyonov-Tyan-Shansky—Naturalist, Researcher, Citizen,” in Laplandsky Zapovednik: Year-book of the Laplandsky State Nature Biosphere Zapovednik, no. 7 (2005–2006), 8.

38. Berlin, “Khraniteli prirodnogo naslediia,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (2004): 7.

39. Mincyte, Diana, “Everyday Environmentalism: The Practice, Politics, and Nature of Subsidiary Farming in Stalin’s Lithuania,” Slavic Review 68, no. 1 (Spring 2009): 31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40. Semenov-Tian-Shanskii, “Dnevnik iz Petrovki (1918),” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 2 (1998); Garros, Véronique, Korenevskaya, Natalia, and Lahusen, Thomas, eds., Intimacy and Terror: Soviet Diaries of the 1930s (New York, 1995), 276–77Google Scholar.

41. Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind, 226.

42. Hellbeck, Jochen, “The Last Soviet Dreamer: Encounters with Leonid Potemkin,” Cahiers du monde russe 50, no. 1 (January-March 2009): 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 147.

43. Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind, 231, 226–35.

44. Ibid., 241, 261.

45. Garros, Korenevskaya, and Lahusen, eds., Intimacy and Terror, 254–56, 259, 271.

46. Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind, 235, 260.

47. Ibid., 225.

48. Garros, Korenevskaya, and Lahusen, eds., Intimacy and Terror, 278.

49. Kaganovsky, Lilya, How the Soviet Man Was Unmade: Cultural Fantasy and Male Subjectivity under Stalin (Pittsburgh, 2008), 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50. Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind, 261.

51. Garros, Korenevskaya, and Lahusen, eds., Intimacy and Terror, 288.

52. Ibid.

53. Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind, 271.

54. Garros, Korenevskaya, and Lahusen, eds., Intimacy and Terror, 251.

55. L. Potemkin, “Istoriia pechengi i ee bogatstva,” Poliarnaia pravda, January 12, 1947, 3; L. Potemkin, “Istoriia pechengi i ee bogatstva,” Poliarnaia pravda, January 2, 1947, 3.

56. Potemkin, L. A., U severnoi granitsy: Pechenga sovetskaia (Murmansk, 1965): 227–62Google Scholar.

57. Potemkin, “Istoriia pechengi i ee bogatstva,” Poliarnaia pravda (January 2, 1947), 3; Potemkin, U severnoi granitsy, 281.

58. GAMO, f. P-359 (Pechengskii raionnyi komitet KP RSFSR, 1946–1991), op, 1, d. 6, l. 2ob (Protokol 1 Pechengskoi raionnoi otchetno-vybornoi partiinoi konferentsii, July 13–14, 1946).

59. GAMO, f. P-359, op, 1, d. 10 (Protokol zasedanii biuro Pechengskoi RK VKP/b/, 1946), l. 197 (Kharakteristika L. A. Potemkina).

60. Potemkin, “Istoriia pechengi i ee bogatstva,” Poliarnaia pravda (January 2, 1947), 3.

61. Hellbeck, Revolution on My Mind, 229.

62. GARF, f. 10174 (Potemkin Leonid Alekseevich, geolog, partiinyi rabotnik, zamestiteĺ ministra geologii RSFSR [1965–1975], 1914–2007), op. 1, d. 5, l. 5 (Spravka Min. geologii SSSR i Prez. Tsentraĺnogo Soveta VOOP o sluzhebnoi i obshchestvennoi deiateĺnosti Potemkina L. A., 1974–1980).

63. Weiner, A Little Corner of Freedom, 402.

64. GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 40, l. 3 (Spravka Potemkina, chlena Tsentraĺnogo Soveta VOOP, 1969–1982).

65. Potemkin, U severnoi granitsy; Potemkin, L. A., Lenin i razvitie mineraĺnoi syŕevoi bazy (Moscow, 1969)Google Scholar; Potemkin, L. A., Okhrana nedr i okruzhaiushchei prirody (Moscow, 1977)Google Scholar.

66. I read through Potemkin’s diaries for 1966–1969, 1972–1974, 1977–1978, and 1986–1987 and he frequently mentioned VOOP lectures and meetings. GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 55 (Dnevnik Potemkina L. A., 1966); GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 56 (Dnevnik Potemkina L. A., 1967–1968); GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 57 (Dnevnik Potemkina L. A., 1969); GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 58 (Dnevnik Potemkina L. A., 1971–1972); GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 59 (Dnevnik Potemkina L. A., 1973–1974); GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 61 (Dnevnik Potemkina L. A., 1977–1978); GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 65 (Dnevnik Potemkina L. A., 1986–1987).

67. GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 57, l. 350ob.

68. GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 58, l. 68.

69. GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 40, l. 5.

70. GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 59, ll. 19, 264, 291; GARF, f. 10174, op. 1, d. 65, l. 29.

71. Potemkin, Okhrana nedr i okruzhaiushchei prirody, 196.

72. Ibid., 8.

73. Ibid., 162.

74. Ibid., 166.

75. Ibid., 131–47, 168–93.

76. Hellbeck, , “The Last Soviet Dreamer: Encounters with Leonid Potemkin,” Cahiers du monde russe 50, no. 1 (January-March 2009): 151–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77. While only recorded in the 1970s and 1980s, her reminiscences still served as a template “for tracking the self in time.” Post-facto memoirs obviously present an alternative glimpse at the self than contemporaneous writings and possess politics that reflect the moments in which they are produced. Yet according to literary scholar Irina Paperno, a “fusion of memoir and diary” often occurred in records of the Soviet era. “Both allow for the self to be linked to the evolving historical time.” Irina Paperno, Stories of the Soviet Experience: Memories, Diaries, Dreams (Ithaca, 2009), xiii, 7.

78. “Boi za nikeĺ: Vospominaniia I. L. Kondrikovoi-Tartakovskoi,” Monchegorskii rabochii, September 13, 1986, 3–4; Tat́iana Shishkina, “Pamiat́o nem khranitsia zdes΄,” Khibinskii Vestnik, September 16, 2004, 6; I. L. Tartakovskaia, “Nachalo,” in G. I. Rakov, ed., Khibinskie Klady: Vospominaniia veteranov osvoeniia Severa (Leningrad, 1972), 60–61; “Boi za nikeĺ,” Monchegorskii rabochii, September 16, 1986, 4.

79. Tartakovskaia, “Nachalo,” in Rakov, ed., Khibinskie Klady, 63; I. L. Tartakovskaia, “Fersman i Kondrikov,” Zhivaia Arktika, no. 1 (October 2001): 35.

80. Tartakovskaia, “Nachalo,” in Rakov, ed., Khibinskie Klady, 64.

81. “Boi za nikeĺ,” Monchegorskii rabochii (September 18, 1986), 4.

82. “Boi za nikeĺ,” Monchegorskii Rabochii (September 23, 1986), 3–4.

83. “Boi za nikeĺ,” Monchegorskii rabochii (September 11, 1986), 3.

84. Tartakovskaia, “Nachalo,” in Rakov, ed., Khibinskie Klady, 62.

85. Sergei Tararaksin, Sudeb sgorevshikh ochertańe (Murmansk, 2006), 81–90.

86. I. L. Tartakovskaia, “Kazaloś, my v kamere symasshedshikh . . .” in V. E. Levtov, ed., Budni boĺshogo terrora v vospominaniiakh i dokumentakh (Saint Petersburg, 2008), 137–38.

87. Ibid., 137–39.

88. Ibid.; “Zhertvy politicheskogo terror SSSR,” Memorial, at, http://lists.memo.ru/d32/f109.htm (last accessed August 20, 2018). Tartakovskaia recalled bravely crying “aren’t you ashamed” at the sentencing agent when learning this fate.

89. Varlam Shalamov, Kolymskie rasskazy (London, 1978), 94.

90. “Boi za nikeĺ,” Monchegorskii rabochii, September 18, 1986, 4.

91. Alexis Peri, The War Within: Diaries from the Siege of Leningrad (Cambridge, Mass., 2017), 42.

92. Anna Müller, If the Walls Could Speak: Inside a Women’s Prison in Communist Poland (Oxford, 2018), 5.

93. Shishkina, “Pamiat́o nem khranitsia zdeś,” Khibinskii Vestnik, September 16, 2004, 6.

94. “Zhertvy politicheskogo terror SSSR,” Memorial, at http://lists.memo.ru/d32/f109.htm (last accessed August 20, 2018); Kozlov, A. G., Teatr na severnoi zemle: Ocherki po istorii Magdanskogo muzykaĺno-dramaticheskogo teatra im. M. Goŕkogo (1933–1953 gg.) (Magadan, 1992), 93–94Google Scholar; Kozlov, A. G., Ogni lagernoi rampy: Iz istorii Magadanskogo teatra 30–50-kh godov (Moscow, 1992), 133–34Google Scholar; Arkadii Arsh, “Ia liubliu tebia, Magadan!” at http://neisri.narod.ru/academnet/1school/15-1951/arsh/index.htm (last accessed August, 2018).

95. Tartakovskaia, “Nachalo,” in Rakov, ed., Khibinskie Klady, 61, 66.

96. Iu. L. Voitekhovskii, “Neizvestnoe piśmo I. L. Kondrikovoi I. V. Beĺkovu,” Tietta, no. 5 (2008): 48–49.

97. A recent critique by Andreas Malm raises many objections to the maximalist strands in Latour’s oeuvre, but it does little to challenge neo-materialism’s potency as a tool for analyzing the underappreciated influence of the material world in specific settings. Malm, Andreas, The Progress of this Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World (London, 2018)Google Scholar.