Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:59:44.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Rights of Women in Russia, 1100-1750

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

George G. Weickhardt
George G. Weickhardt*
Affiliation:
law firm of Adams, Duque & Hazeltine, San Francisco
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This study will trace the evolution of rights of women to acquire and own land in Russia during the period 1100-1750. While detailed studies of particular periods are valuable, only with a chronological comparison can one appreciate the overall direction in which women's legal rights were developing and, specifically, whether they were contracting or expanding. Taking the long view in legal history is particularly important because changes in legal rules and legal status are often gradual, even glacial, and such change may be perceptible only over centuries. An overview is also important for the placement of past and future studies of particular periods in context. While it would be more conventional to conclude at the end of the Muscovite period rather than in the early empire, there were developments in women's rights in the Muscovite period which reached logical conclusions only in the mid-eighteenth century, such as the consolidation of a widow's rights to her husband's property.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , Spring 1996 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The author wishes to thank Nancy Shields Kollmann, Richard Hellie and Michelle Marrese for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

1. Vladimirskii-Budanov, M.F., Obzor istorii russkago prava, 6th ed. (St. Petersburg & Kiev: Tip.N.la.Ogloblina, 1909), 374.Google Scholar

2. The author is indebted to Daniel Kaiser for the following references: Zabelin, Iv, “Zhenshchina po poniatiiam starinnykh knizhnikov,” in Zabelin, , Opyty izucheniia russkikh drevnostei i istorii, 2 vols. (Moscow: Tipografiia Gracheva, 1872–73), 1: 129–78Google Scholar; Shashkov, S. S., Sobranie sochinenii, vol. I: Istoricheskie sud'by zhenshchiny, deloubiislvo i prostitutsiia. Istoriia russkoi zhenshchiny (St. Petersburg: Izd.O.N.Popovoi, 1898), 696–894 Google Scholar; Savel'ev, Al., luridicheskie otnosheniia mezhdu suprugami (Nizhnii Novgorod, 1881)Google Scholar; Shul'gin, Vitalii, O sostoianii zhenshchin v Rossii do Petra Velikago (Kiev, 1850)Google Scholar. For more balanced assessments, see Kavelin, K., Vzgliad na istoricheskoe razvitie russkago poriadka zakonnago nasledovaniia (St. Petersburg: Tipografiia Karla Vul'fa, 1860)Google Scholar and Sergeevich, V. I., Lektsii i issledovaniia po drevnei istorii russkago prava, 4th ed. (St. Petersburg: Tip. M.M. Stasiulevicha, 1910), 456–92, 548–75Google Scholar. See also Eck, Alexandre, “La situation juridique de la femme russe au moyen age,” Recueils de la Société jean Bodin 12 (1962): 405–20.Google Scholar

3. Pushkareva, N. L., “Imushchestvennye prava zhenshchin na Rusi (X-XV vv.),” Istoricheskie zapiski, 114 (1986): 180–224 Google Scholar; idem. and Eve Levin, “Zhenshchina v srednevekovom Novgorode XI-XV vv.,” Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Seriia 8: Isloriia, 1983(3): 78–89; idem, Zhenshchiny drevnei Rusi (Moscow: Mysl', 1989), see in particular chap. 3; idem., “Pravovoe polozhenie zhenshchiny v srednevekovoi Rusi: Voprosy prestupleniia i nakazaniia,” Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no. 4 (1985): 121–26.

4. Kleimola, Ann M., ‘“In accordance with the canons of the Holy Apostles': Muscovite Dowries and Women's Property Rights,” The Russian Review 51, no. 2 (1991): 204–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Vernadsky, George, “Studies in the History of Moscovian Private Law of the 16th and 17th Centuries. Inheritance: The Case of the Childless Wife,” in Sludi in Memoria di Aldo Albertoni, 3 vols. (Padua: Casa Editrice Dutt. Antonio Milani, 1935), 3: 433–54.Google Scholar

6. Levin, Eve, “Women and Property in Medieval Novgorod: Dependence and Independence,” Russian History 10, no. 2 (1983): 134–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. “Women and the Control of Property in Sixteenth Century Muscovy,” Russian History 10, no. 2 (1983): 201–12.

8. Daniel Kaiser, “Women's Property in Muscovite Families, 1500–1725,” paper prepared for conference on “Women in the History of the Russian Empire,” Kent State University and the University of Akron, 11–14 August 1988.

9. Idem., “Women, Property and the Law in Muscovite Russia,” unpublished paper.

10. Goehrke, Carsten, “Die Witwe in Alten Russland,” Forschungen zur Osteuropaischen Geschichte 38 (1986): 64–96.Google Scholar

11. Suzanne Janesik McNally, From Public Person to Private Prisoner: The Changing Place of Women in Medieval Russia (Ph.D. diss., State University of New York at Binghamtom, 1976); George Vernadsky, “Studies in the History of Muscovian Private Law. “

12. A.A. Zimin, S.V. Iushkov, L.V. Cherepnin and R.A. Sotronenko, eds. Pamiatniki russkogo prava (Moscow: Izd. iuridicheskoi literatury, 1952–9), 1: 77–80, 108–20Google Scholar (hereinafter “PRP “); Kaiser, Daniel H., The Laws of Rus'—Tenth to Fifteenth Centuries (Salt Lake City: Chs. Schlacks, Jr., 1992), 14–40 Google Scholar. For good general discussions of the inheritance provisions in the Russian Law, see Sergeevich, Leklsii, 548–79; and Vladimirskii-Budanov, Obzor, 470–85.

13. A Manual of Eastern Roman Law: The Procheiros Nomos, trans. Edwin Hanson Freshfield (Cambridge: University Press, 1928); A Revised Manual of Roman Law (Ecloga Privata Aucta), trans. Edwin Hanson Freshfield (Cambridge: University Press, 1927). For a discussion of purported borrowings from the Ecloga in the Russian Law, see Sergeevich, Lektsii, 554–60.

14. Tikhomirov, M.N. and Milov, L.V., eds., Zakon sudnyi liudem, kratkoi redaklsii (Moscow: Izd. Akademii nauk SSSR, 1961), 104–9Google Scholar; Zakon sudnyi ljudem (Court Law for the People), trans. H.W. Dewey and A.M. Kleimola (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, 1977), 1–51.

15. Russkaia istoricheskaia biblioteka (St. Petersburg: Arkheograficheskaia Komissiia, 1878), vi: 241–44.

16. PRP, 3: 341–418.

17. Ibid., 4: 227–61.

18. Grekov, B.D., ed., Akty sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoi istorii severo-vostochoi Rusi kontsa XlV-nachala XVI v., 3 vols. (Moscow: Izd. Akaclemii nauk SSSR, 1952–64) ( “ASEI “)Google Scholar; Cherepnin, L.V., ed., Akty feodal'nogo zemlevladeniia i khoziaistva XIV XVI vekov, 3 vols. (Moscow: Izd. Akademii nauk SSSR, 1951–6) ( “AFZKh “)Google Scholar; Fedotov-Chekhovskii, A., ed., Akty olnosiashchiesia do grazhdanskoi raspavy drevnei Russi, 2 vols. (Kiev: Tip l.A. Davidenko, 1860)Google Scholar ( “AGR “); Likhachev, N. P., Sbornik aktov sobrannykh v arkhivakh i bibliotekakh (St. Petersburg: V.S. Balashev, 1895) ( “Likhachev “)Google Scholar; Kotkov, S.I. et al., eds., Moskovskaia delovaia i bytovaia pis'mennost’ XVII veka (Moscow: Nauka, 1968) ( “MDBP “Google Scholar); Iushkov, A., Akty XIII XV1I vv. predstavlennye v Razriadnyi prikaz (Moscow: Univ. Tip., 1898) ( “Iushkov “)Google Scholar. The data base consists of 19 purchase deeds to or from women, 70 gift deeds, 88 wills and 21 judgment charters or case reports involving women as litigants.

19. See, e.g., ASEI, I: nos. 108, 472; III: 67, 67a, 473.

20. See, e.g., Iushkov, nos. 77, 78 and 90.

21. Hellie, Richard, Slavery in Russia (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 611.Google Scholar

22. Kleimola, “In Accordance. “

23. Blum, Jerome, Lord and Peasant in Russia From the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century (New York: Atheneum, 1964), 177–78.Google Scholar

24. Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopisei (St. Petersburg: Arkheograficheskaia Kommissiia, 1841), 13: (pt. 1) 268–69.

25. PRP, 4: 529–32.

26. Kobrin, V. B., Vlast’ i sobstvennost’ v srednevekovoi Rossii (Moscow: Mysl', 1985), 32–42, 68–89.Google Scholar

27. See, e.g., Likhachev, item nos. XVII, XIX, XX, XXI.

28. PRP, 5: 453–60.

29. Kaiser, “Women's Property,” 14.

30. AGR, no. 110, I: 382–407.

31. Hellie, Richard, The Muscovite Law Code (Ulozhenie) of 1649 (Irvine: Chs. Schlacks Jr., 1988)Google Scholar. Cited as “U. “

32. See Weickhardt, George G., “The Pre-Petrine Law of Property,” Slavic Review 52, no. 4 (1993): 663–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. AFZKh, III: items 281, 288, 290, 293, 294, 301, 302, 309, 323, 324.

34. Polnoe sobranie zahonov Rossiiskoi imperii ( “PSZ “) (St. Petersburg: Tip. 2 Otdeleniia Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskago Velichestva Kantseliarii, 1832), no. 700, art. 30.

35. Kobrin, 90–135.

36. AGR, no. 139, 2: 366–81.

37. PSZ, no. 1285.

38. Vladimirskii-Budanov, Obzor, 449–56.

39. PSZ, no. 2789.

40. PSZ, no. 3013.

41. PSZ, no. 4722.

42. PSZ, no. 5717.

43. PSZ, no. 8127.

44. Personal communication from Michelle Marrese, whose unpublished Ph.D. dissertation “Women and the Control of Property in Russia, 1700–1861” was submitted to Northwestern University in 1995.

45. Vladimirskii-Budanov, Obzor, 456–57.

46. Staves, Susan, Married Women's Separate Property in England, 1660–1833 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990), 1–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. Wagner, William G., Marriage, Property and Law in Late Imperial Russia (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48. Staves, Married Women's, 1–90.

49. Keep, John L.H., Soldiers of the Tsar: Army and Society in Russia 1462–1874 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), 102–35.Google Scholar

50. Walters, Brenda Meehan, Autocracy and Aristocracy: The Russian Service Elite of 1730 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1982), 71–77.Google Scholar