Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:30:52.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nation, Gender, Class: Celebrity Culture and the Performance of Identity in the Balkans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Breda Luthar  and
Andreja Trdina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we explore performance and the “dramatic realization” of local female social elites in popular mass-market magazines in Slovenia and Croatia between 2008 and 2011. We argue that popular culture—and, more specifically, celebrity discourse—is one of the central locations for analyzing cultural shifts in gender, nationality, and class in postsocialist society. At the center of the discussion is the argument that ethnicity should not be seen as an independent social process; the rise of national distinctions in the Balkans and the reframing of the nation need to be examined by stressing the rearticulations of class, ethnicity, and gender as they are experienced as organizing categories of social differences. We focus on two genres: social chronicles, or “society pages,” and photo interviews with elite professionals. We investigate the key intersections of gender, class, and nationality and, more generally, reflect on the transformations in discourses of Balkan identity.

Type
Rethinking “Europe” Versus “The Balkans” in Media Discourses
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , Summer 2015 , pp. 265 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rogers, Brubaker, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (Cambridge, Eng., 1996), 20 Google Scholar.

2. Billig, Michael, Banal Nationalism (London, 1995), 6 Google Scholar.

3. Ignatieff, Michael, Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism (New York, 1993), 4.Google Scholar

4. On the notion of presentational media, such as Facebook and Twitter, see David Marshall, P., “The Promotion and Presentation of the Self: Celebrity as Marker of Presentational Media,” Celebrity Studies 1, no. 1 (March 2010): 35–48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. The fact that the majority of the media was drawn to the everyday and the ordinary (i.e., the demotic turn) should be understood as a ritualization of media openness rather than a democratic development. See Turner, Graeme, Understanding Celebrity (London, 2004), 82–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Morley, David, Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity (London, 2000), 105 Google Scholar.

7. For more on transformations of cultural identities through public discourse in postsocialist societies, see also Ljiljana Šarić, Andreas Musolff, Stefan Manz, and Ingrid Hudabiunigg, eds., Contesting Europe's Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse (Bristol, 2010); and Vezovnik, Andreja, “Representational Discourses on the Erased of Slovenia: From Human Rights to Humanitarian Victimization,” Journal of Language and Politics 12, no. 4 (January 2013): 606-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On class and ethnicity in Macedonia, for example, see Dimova, Rozita, “Consuming Ethnicity: Loss, Commodities, and Space in Macedonia,” Slavic Review 69, no. 4 (Winter 2010): 859-81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. Rener, Tanja and Ule, Mirjana, “Back to the Future: Nationalism and Gender in Post-socialist Societies,” in Wilford, Rick and Miller, Robert L., eds., Women, Ethnicity and Nationalism: The Politics of Transition (London, 1998), 105 Google Scholar. See also Susan Gal and Gail Kligman, The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay (Princeton, 2000).

9. West, Candace and Fenstermaker, Sarah, “Doing Difference,” Gender and Society 9, no. 1 (February 1995): 9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Hall, Stuart, “Race, Articulation and Societies Structured in Dominance,” in Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism (Paris, 1980), 305-45Google Scholar. Tim Butler and Michael Savage argue in Social Change and the Middle Classes (London, 1995) that gender, for example, should be understood as an independent stratifying principle (38). The same could be claimed for the ethnicity.

11. Yuval-Davis, Nira, “Gender and Nation,” in Wilford, Rick and Miller, Robert L., eds., Women, Ethnicity and Nationalism (London, 1998), 21–31.Google Scholar

12. See also P. D. Marshal, who argues in his Celebrity and Power: Fame in Contemporary Culture (Minneapolis, 1997) that celebrity is “an embodiment of a discursive battleground on the norms of individuality and personality within a culture” (65).

13. According to the latest available data gathered by National Readership Research in Slovenia, Ona has a reach of 17.8 percent, Lady of 13.1 percent, Jana of 6.5 percent, and Obrazi of 3.2 percent. For the sake of comparison, the major daily newspaper Delo reported a 7.9 percent reach in 2009. See http://www.nrb.info/podatki/index.html (last accessed January 30, 2015). The selected Croatian titles also had the highest readership in the analyzed period; in 2009, for example, Gloria had a reach of 19.8 percent, Story of 12 percent, and Gloria GLAM of 11 percent. MEDIApuls Media Reports, at http://www.puls.hr (no longer available).

14. A total of 104 interviews with professional women and more than 200 society pages from the chosen magazines in the selected period were analyzed. We should note that despite the increasingly diverse range of celebrity figures and the increasing visibility of “ordinary celebrities” (reality TV participants, game show contestants), politicians and the business elite in Slovenia still represent a considerable part of the local celebrities appearing in interviews and society pages, whereas in Croatian media, representatives of the entertainment industry seem to occupy more prominent positions than the political elite in either genre.

15. See Turner, Graeme, Understanding Celebrity (London, 2004), 80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Corner, John, “Mediated Persona and Political Culture,” in Corner, John and Pels, Dick, eds., Media and the Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity and Cynicism (London, 2003), 68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Ibid., 75.

18. Löwenthal's article, which was first published in 1944, became one of the canonical texts in communication studies. See Löwenthal, Leo, “Biographies in Popular Magazines,” in Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and Stanton, Frank N., eds., Radio Research 1942-1943 (New York, 1944), 507-48Google Scholar.

19. Alberoni, Francesco, “The Powerless ‘Elite’: Theory and Sociological Research on the Phenomenon of the Stars,” in McQuail, Denis, ed., Sociology of Mass Communications (Harmondsworth, 1971), 75–99.Google Scholar

20. Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York, 1990)Google Scholar.

21. The performance of national identity of course includes different symbolic sites, from monuments, national events and institutions to everyday landscapes of routine life and popular cultural forms.

22. Edensor, Tim, National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life (Oxford, 2002), 69 Google Scholar.

23. Hage, Ghassan, White Nation: Fantasies of White Supremacy in a Multicultural Society (Annandale, 1998), 49–55 Google Scholar.

24. Ibid., 52. See also Bennett, Tony, Savage, Mike, Silva, Elizabeth, Warde, Alan, Gayo-Cal, Modesto, and Wright, David, Culture, Class, Distinction (London, 2009), 258-59CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for a similar notion of “national capital” in the context of class distinctions.

25. On audience-mediated experience and its effects, see Scannell, Paddy, “Authenticity and Experience,” Discourse Studies 3, no. 4 (November 2001): 409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26. Turner, Graeme, Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn (Los Angeles, 2010), 10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Although the corporate interests of the media and culture industries in the production of celebrity are obvious, and local or global celebrity is also a manufactured commodity, here we do not address the political economy of celebrity.

27. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London, 2006), 6 Google Scholar.

28. Obrazi, no. 3, February 1, 2008, 86; Lea, no. 10, March 4, 2009, 40; and Story, March 30, 2010, 11.

29. Sacks, Harvey, “On Doing ‘Being’ Ordinary,” in Maxwell Atkinson, J. and Heritage, John, eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (Cambridge, Eng., 1984), 419 Google Scholar.

30. Alexander, Jeffrey C., “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy,” Sociological Theory 22, no. 4 (December 2004): 550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31. Edensor, National Identity, 92.

32. Gloria, November 24, 2011, 26-33.

33. As such, these shared conventions of how to be ordinary usually become reflexive or habitual and, by restricting the scope of appropriate performances in public, consolidate a sense of national identity. This is why it is so difficult, as Edensor argues, for those unfamiliar with a particular national culture to simply learn it and “pass” as national subjects unproblematically. Edensor, National Identity, 90.

34. Gloria, June 9,2011,20

35. Kendall, Diana, Framing Class: Media Representations of Wealth and Poverty in America (Lanham, 2005), 30–35 Google Scholar.

36. “Erika Žnidaršič, presenter of the show Piramida, surprised us with an excellent performance in this year's oh-so-fashionable purple.” Obrazi, no. 2, January 8, 2009, 68. “At least actress Marija Borić does not have to think much about a haircut for the party; this new one fits her perfectly.” Story, April 28,2010,7. “Ella was in City Center One looking for new clothes all day. For the coming fall, the young blonde chose a cute black leather jacket that fits her brilliantly.” Story, August 11, 2010, 10.

37. “We have noticed that Katarina Kresal loves high heels.” Lady, no. 44, October 29, 2008,48. Another local elite woman is seen “in a light blue silk dress with flower applications.” Obrazi, no. 9, February 26, 2009, 22.

38. The remains of the spoken word are most obvious in formulations such as “you know,” “of course,” “thank god,” the anticipatory particle “really,” the interjection “well,” the slightly evaluative descriptor “like,” and the skeptical “actually.”

39. Elizabeth Bird, S., For Enquiring Minds: A Cultural Study of Supermarket Tabloids (Knoxville, 1992), 4 Google Scholar. For more on situating tabloids in a tradition of oral, folk narrative, see ibid., 162-200.

40. Paddy Scannell and David Cardiff, A Social History of British Broadcasting, vol. 1, 1922-1939: Serving the Nation (Cambridge, Mass., 1991), 162.

41. Bauman, Zygmunt, Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World (Cambridge, Eng., 2001), 64 Google Scholar.

42. On celebrity as class pantomime, see Tyler, Imogen and Bennett, Bruce, “‘Celebrity Chav’: Fame, Femininity and Social Class,” European Journal of Cultural Studies 13, no. 3 (August 2010): 380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43. Yet, as Cas Wouters argues, national habitus formation is in turn to be understood and explained largely from countries’ specific class structures and the ways in which classes in these countries have mingled and amalgamated. Wouters, Cas, Informalization: Manners and Emotions since 1890 (London, 2007), 10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44. Tyler and Bennett, “‘Celebrity Chav,’” 375-93.

45. Skeggs, Beverley, Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable (London, 1997), 102 Google Scholar.

46. See, for example, Brown, Jeffrey A., “Class and Feminine Excess: The Strange Case of Anna Nicole Smith,” Feminist Review, no. 81 (2005): 74–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and, on the class prejudices underlying the gendered treatment of Britney Spears in popular media, Williamson, Milly, “Female Celebrities and the Media: The Gendered Denigration of the ‘Ordinary’ Celebrity,” Celebrity Studies 1, no. 1 (2010): 118-20CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On suppressing class and its displacements through other categories (gender in particular) in popular TV sitcoms in Slovenia, see Jontes, Dejan, “Razred vpopularnih televizijskih zanrih,” Teorija inpraksa 48, no. 4 (2011): 968-81Google Scholar.

47. See Skeggs, Beverley, “The Toilet Paper: Femininity, Class and Mis-Recognition,” Women's Studies International Forum 24, nos. 3-4 (2001): 298 Google Scholar.

48. Obrazi, no. 37, December 4, 2008, 80.

49. Obrazi, no. 18, July 23, 2009, 74.

50. The category of “lady,” characterized by ease and a restrained attitude, is a bourgeois ideal of femininity, a sign of distinction that had already been constructed in the eighteenth century. See Poovey, Mary, The Proper Lady and the Woman Writer: Ideology as Style in the Works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen (Chicago, 1984)Google Scholar.

51. Mosse, George L., Nationalism and Sexuality: Respectability and Abnormal Sexuality in Modern Europe (New York, 1985), 18 Google Scholar.

52. On political efforts to increase birth rates, see Rener and Ule, “Back to the Future,” 111-12.

53. Couldry, Nick, “Theorising Media as Practice,” in Bräuchler, Birgit and Postill, John, eds., Theorising Media and Practice (Oxford, 2010), 49 Google Scholar.

54. See Corner, John, “The Interview as Social Encounter,” in Scannell, Paddy, ed., Broadcast Talk (London, 1991), 31–47 Google Scholar.

55. Goffman, Erving, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York, 1959; London, 1990), 15 Google Scholar. 56. Ibid., 45.

57. Macdonald, Myra, Exploring Media Discourse (London, 2003), 76 Google Scholar.

58. Jana, no. 13, March 25, 2008, 34-37.

59. Jana, no. 32, August 5, 2008, 11-13.

60. Gloria, November 17, 2011, 20-26.

61. Gloria, May 5, 2011, 112-15.

62. One of the most prominent popular values is the family and love for children: “All my life I dreamed of big success, but on every trip I most look forward to coming home; career is for nothing if you do not have someone to return to.” Gloria, January 27, 2011, 18-23. Even if a woman does not yet have a family, she must perform to desire one: “I cannot wait to become a mum.” Story, October 19,2011,36-39. “I love children, but until I get my own, I enjoy time with my niece and my younger sister, who is nine years old.” Gloria, May 5, 2011,112-15.

63. For more on “popular proto-nationalism,” see Hobsbawm, Eric, Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality (Cambridge, Eng., 1990), 46–79 Google Scholar.

64. Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal, Hegemonija in socialistična strategija: K radikalni demokratični politiki (Ljubljana, 1987), 98 Google Scholar.

65. Jana, no. 5, February 3, 2009, 14-16.

66. Gloria, November 24, 2011, 26-33.

67. Burr, Vivien, An Introduction to Social Constructionism (London, 1995), 86–95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68. Ibid., 93.

69. Jana, no. 3, January 15, 2008, 26-27.

70. Story, January 5, 2010, 20-25.

71. Gloria, September 8, 2011,38-44.

72. See also Löwenthal, “Biographies in Popular Magazines,” 198.

73. Hall, Stuart, “Lastnosti novičarskih fotografij,” in Luthar, Breda, Zei, Vida, and Hardt, Hanno, eds., Medijska kultura: Kako brati medijske tekste (Ljubljana, 2004), 198 Google Scholar.

74. See Luthar, Breda, “People Just Like Us: Political Celebrity and Creation of National Normality,” Cultural Studies 24, no. 5 (September 2010): 690–715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

75. Berger, John, Ways of Seeing (London, 1972; New York, 1990), 55 Google Scholar.

76. See also van Zoonen, Liesbet, Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge (Lanham, 2005), 101 Google Scholar.

77. Emmison, Michael and Smith, Philip, Researching the Visual: Images, Objects, Contexts and Interactions in Social and Cultural Inquiry (London, 2000), 224 Google Scholar.

78. Gender divisions, which are symbolically established by popular cultural institutions and practices, can only function within the context of and in interrelation with other discourses and institutions (legal, political, educational, etc.). See also Pušnik, Maruša and Bulc, Gregor, “Women in Their Own Reflection: Self-Representation of Women Politicians in the Slovenian Press,” Journal of Communication Inquiry 25, no. 4 (October 2001): 396–412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79. Laclau and MoufFe, Hegemonija in socialisticna strategija, 101.

80. Ona, no. 11, March 17, 2009,10-14; Gloria, November 24, 2011, 26-33; Jana, no. 5, February 3,2009,14-16; and Jana, no. 13, March 25,2008,34-37.

81. Herzfeld, Michael, Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation-State (New York, 1997), 26, 32Google Scholar.

82. “You appear fragile, but you handled low blows in the election debates so brilliantly.” Ona, no. 11, March 17, 2009,10-14. “[She is] fragile and gentle at first sight but a determined fighter for human rights, constantly presenting ministers with unpleasant questions about the observed irregularities in their work.” Obrazi, no. 8, April 15, 2008, 40-43.

83. “Many have no idea that there is a very tolerant, kind, understanding, and warm woman behind that stern look.” Jana, no. 5, February 3,2009,14-16. “[This is the] smile of a woman who knows how to find a kind word for everyone but who can also put her foot down when necessary.” Jana, no. 39, September 29, 2009, 49.

84. Goffman, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. According to Myra Macdonald, the idea of the woman as a selfless caretaker, characterized by “caring” and “sharing,” is one of the myths that contribute to the typical verbal and visual construction of femininity in popular media. Macdonald, Myra, Representing Women: Myths of Femininity in the Popular Media (London, 1995), 132-62Google Scholar.

85. Gloria, May 5,2011,112-15.

86. Herzfeld, Cultural Intimacy, 25.

87. Rener and Ule, “Back to the Future,” 112. For an intriguing discussion of the changing ideologies of care in the postsocialist context which focuses on nursing practices that extend labor across the public sphere of work, on the one hand, and the domestic world of emotion, kinship obligation, and personal relationships, on the other, see Read, Rosie, “Labour and Love: Competing Constructions of ‘Care’ in a Czech Nursing Home,” Critique of Anthropology 27, no. 2 (June 2007): 203-22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88. Wilford, Rick, “Women, Ethnicity and Nationalism: Surveying the Ground,” in Wilford, Rick and Miller, Robert L., eds., Women, Ethnicity and Nationalism (London, 1998), 1.Google Scholar

89. Edensor, National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life, 90.

90. Chaney, David, “A Symbolic Mirror of Ourselves: Civic Ritual in Mass Society,” in Collins, Richard, Curran, James, Garnham, Nicholas, Scannell, Paddy, Schlesinger, Philip, and Sparks, Colin, eds., Media, Culture and Society: A Critical Reader (London, 1986), 248 Google Scholar.

91. Collins, Jim, Uncommon Cultures: Popular Culture and Post-Modernism (New York, 1989), 85 Google Scholar.

92. When discussing the difficulty of producing narratives of class in late modernity as a general, and not a specifically national, problem, Nick Couldry stresses that the problem is “not in media's failure to sustain an account of class based in inequalities of resource distribution, but in the specific ways in which that story fails to be told.” Couldry, Nick, “Class and Contemporary Forms of ‘Reality’ Production, or Hidden Injuries of Class,” in Wood, Helen and Skeggs, Beverley, eds., Reality Television and Class (London, 2011), 33 Google Scholar. Emphasis in the original.

93. For data on gender and family values, see Listhaug, Ola and Ringdal, Kristen, “Slovenian Values in a European Context,” in Ramet, Sabrina P. and Fink-Hafner, Danica, eds., Democratic Transition in Slovenia: Value Transformation, Education, and Media (College Station, 2006), 59 Google Scholar. See also Ramet, Sabrina P., Religija ipolitika u vreme promene (Belgrade, 2006)Google Scholar. While close to 90 percent of citizens identified themselves as Catholics, more than 55 percent reported that they believe abortion should remain legal. Zrinščak, Siniša, “Religion and Social Justice in Post-Communist Croatia,” in Borowik, Irena and Tomka, Miklós, eds., Religion and Social Change in Post-Communist Europe (Kraków, 2001), 190 Google Scholar.

94. See Županov, Josip, “Hrvatsko društvo danas—kontinuitet i promjena,” Politička misao 48, no. 3 (2011): 145-63Google Scholar; reprinted from Županov, Josip, Poslije potopa (Zagreb, 1995), 160-84Google Scholar. See also recent data on egalitarian syndrome in Slovenia in Brina Malnar, “Trendi neenakosti v Sloveniji med statistiko in javnim mnenjem,” Teorija in praksa 48, no. 4 (luly-August, 2011): 951-67, and Luthar, Breda, “Popularna kultura in razredne distinkcije v Sloveniji: Simbolne meje v egalitarni družbi,” Družboslovne razprave, no. 28 (2012): 13–37 Google Scholar, which confirm this prediction and also establish the existence of contradictory populism.

95. On contradictory values concerning gender equality after 1991, see Antić, Milica G., “Gender Equality in Slovenia: Continuity and Changes in the 1990s,” in Ramet, Sabrina P. and Fink-Hafner, Danica, eds., Democratic Transition in Slovenia: Value Transformation, Education, and Media (College Station, 2006), 215-32Google Scholar.

96. Braudel, Fernand, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, trans. Reynolds, Siân, vol. 1 (Berkeley, 1995), 21 Google Scholar.

97. Corner, John, Theorizing Media: Power, Form, Subjectivity (Manchester, 2011), 75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98. See Bird, For Enquiring Minds.

99. Löwenthal, “Biographies in Popular Magazines,” 198.