Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T12:40:58.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pressuring the Politburo: The Committee of the Bulgarian Women's Movement and State Socialist Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kristen Ghodsee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

National women's organizations were a ubiquitous feature of all of the eastern European communist nations. Although the specificities of these organizations varied from country to country, they were all state-run mass organizations variously charged with mobilizing domestic women and representing their nations at international forums concerning women's rights. In the west, these state women's organizations were treated with suspicion; they were often viewed as tools of authoritarian control, mobilizing women to fulfill party goals. It is rarely considered that eastern bloc women may have used their privileged relationship with the Communist Party to promote policies that actually helped women, or that they could push back at male patriarchal elites by appealing to higher communist principles regarding the woman question. This article is a case study of the Committee of the Bulgarian Women's Movement. It demonstrates that this organization, despite its entanglement with the state bureaucracy, was relatively successful in pressuring the Bulgarian Politburo into expanding rights and entitlements to women between 1968 and 1990.

Type
Articles
Information
Slavic Review , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , Fall 2014 , pp. 538 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Maxine, Molyneux, “Socialist Societies Old and New: Progress toward Women's Emancipation?,” Feminist Review, no. 8(Summer 1981): 28.Google Scholar

2. Francisca de Haan, “Continuing Cold War Paradigms in the Western Historiography of Transnational Women's Organisations: The Case of the Women's International Democratic Federation (WIDF),” Women's History Review19, no. 4 (2010): 548

3. See, for instance, Johanna, Kantolaand Judith, Squires, “From State Feminism to Market Feminism?,” International Political Science Review 33, no. 4(September 2012): 382–400 Google Scholar; McBride, Dorothy E.and Mazur, Amy G., The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research(Philadelphia, 2010)Google Scholar; Stetson, Dorothy McBrideand Mazur, Amy G., eds., Comparative State Feminism(London, 1995)Google Scholar; and Smith, Lois M.and Alfred, Padula, Sex and Revolution: Women in Socialist Cuba(Oxford, 1996).Google Scholar

4. Mazur, Amy G.and McBride, Dorothy E., “State Feminism since the 1980s: From Loose Notion to Operationalized Concept,” Politics & Gender 3, no. 4(December 2007): 502.Google Scholar

5. Jancar, Barbara Wolfe, Women under Communism(Baltimore, 1978), 504.Google Scholar

6. Ibid., 106

7. Wolchik, Sharon Lee, “Politics, Ideology and Equality: The Status of Women in Eastern Europe”(PhD diss., University of Michigan, 1978).Google Scholar

8. lancar, , Women under Communism,206-7.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., 210.

10. Saba, Mahmood, The Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject(Princeton, 2005).Google Scholar

11. Amy, Borovoyand Kristen, Ghodsee, “Decentering Agency in Feminist Theory: Social Democracy, Postsocialism, and the Re-engagement of the Social Good,” Women's Studies International Forum 35(2012): 153-65.Google Scholar

12. Stetson, and Mazur, , eds., Comparative State Feminism, 290-91Google Scholar. Emphasis added.

13. Jean, Robinson, “Women, the State, and the Need for Civil Society: The Liga Kobiet in Poland,”in Stetson, and Mazur, , eds., Comparative State Feminism, 203-20.Google Scholar

14. Robinson, “Women, the State, and the Need for Civil Society,” 212.

15. Wang, Zheng, ‘“State Feminism'? Gender and Socialist State Formation in Maoist China,” Feminist Studies 31, no. 3(Fall 2005): 519.Google Scholar

16. Ibid., 520.

17. See also Wang, Zheng, “Creating a Socialist Feminist Cultural Front: Women of China(1949-1966),” China Quarterly, no. 204(December 2010): 827-49.Google Scholar

18. On the organizations in Hungary and Romania, see Raluca Maria, Popa, “Translating Equality between Women and Men across Cold War Divides: Women Activists from Hungary and Romania and the Creation of International Women's Year,”in Shana, Pennand Jill, Massino, eds., Gender Politics and Everyday Life in State Socialist Eastern and Central Europe(London, 2009)Google Scholar; in Yugoslavia, , Chiari, Bonfiglioli, “Revolutionary Networks: Women's Political and Social Activism in Cold War Italy and Yugoslavia (1945-1957)“(PhD diss., University of Utrecht, 2012)Google Scholar; and in the eastern bloc more broadly, Francisca de Haan, “Continuing Cold War Paradigms.“

19. Tsentralen durzhaven arkhiv (hereafter TsDA), fond (f.) 417, opis (o.) 1-7, arkivna edinitsa (a.e.) multiple. For the documents that come from the personal archive of Elena Lagadinova, I refer to them by their title and date, followed by the abbreviation PAoEL. All translations from the Bulgarian are my own or that of my research assistant, Miroslava Nikolova.

20. This article is part of a larger book project, which aims to be a salvage ethnography of the Bulgarian women's committee. The historian Maria Todorova has argued that it is imperative to document the experiences of people who lived through the communist era, likening this to the process of salvage ethnography. This term was originally used to describe the work of American anthropologists in the mid-twentieth century who were recording the languages, theologies, and folklores of Native American tribes before they became assimilated into mainstream white American culture. Todorova asserts that the experiences of those who lived under communism are rapidly being lost as the older generation dies off. See the introduction by Maria, Todorovain Maria Todorova, ed., Remembering Communism: Genres of Representation(New York, 2010), 14.Google Scholar

21. Krassimira, Daskalova, “The Woman's Movement in Bulgaria in a Life Story,” Women's History Review 13, no. 1 (March 2004): 91–103.Google Scholar

22. Maria Dinkova, “Strasti po velikata zhenska revoliutsiia,” Vesni, 2003, no. 5: 27-30; Dinkova, “Strasti po velikata zhenska revoliutsiia,” Vesni, 2003, nos. 6-7: 24-25; and Dinkova, “Strasti po velikata zhenska revoliutsiia,” Vesni, 2008, no. 6:33-62.

23. “Zhenata dnes—zhena s minalo: Nai-dulgoletnoto bulgarsko spisanie navarshi 60 godini,” Zhenata dnes, 2005, no. 1:112-16.

24. Ibid, 112.

25. Joana Pavlova, “Razshiriavanena ‘chastnoto’ prostranstvo vpublichnoto: Spisanie 'Zhenata dnes’ prez 1954-1958 g.,” in Krassimira Daskalova and Tatyana Kmetova, Gender and Transition, 1938-1958(Sofia, 2011), 189-200.

26. Maria Dinkova, personal communication, July 2010, Sofia, Bulgaria.

27. TsDA, f. 417, o. 4, a.e. 492, list (11.) 71-72.

28. Ibid.

29. Mira, Badzheva, “Sonia Bakish: Dnes zhenata e po-agresivna. No prava li e?,“ Zhenata dnes, 2005, no. 1:136-38.Google Scholar

30. Ibid.

31. TsDA, f. 417, o. 2, a.e. 1,11.14-16. The CBWM's annual budgets are also archived in TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 572,11.1-26.

32. Robinson, “Women, the State, and the Need for Civil Society,” 205-10.

33. Fredda, Brilliant, “Madame Elena Lagadinova,”in Fredda, Brilliant, ed., Women in Power(New Delhi, 1987), 77 Google Scholar. See also lean, Lipman-Blumen, Connective Leadership: Managing in a Changing World(Oxford, 1996), 299 Google Scholar. Unlike partisans who lived in the mountains on a permanent basis, the iatatsiwere those allied with the partisans who lived in town and were thus at greater risk of being caught.

34. A habilitationis the highest academic qualification a scholar can achieve in Bulgaria and several other European countries. Lagadinova keeps a rich personal archive of all of her diplomas and curriculum vitae.

35. TsDA, f. 417, o. 2, a.e. 1,11.1-4.

36. Maria, Dinkova, The Social Progress of the Bulgarian Woman(Sofia, 1972), 60–61.Google Scholar

37. Iliana, Marcheva, “Istoriiata na edna predizvestena smurt ili kraiat na organiziranoto zhensko dvizhenie v Bŭlgariia (1944-1950),” Epokhi 5, no. 2: (1998) 60–61.Google Scholar

38. TsDA, f. 417, o. 2, a.e. 15,11. 58-69; TsDA, f. 417, o. 2, a.e. 1,11.14-16. Luleva, A., '“Zhenskiiat vapros’ v sotsialisticheska Bulgariia—ideologiia, politika, realnost,”in Soltsializmŭt: Iliuzni i realnost, etnologichni aspekti na vsekidnevnata kultura. Sbornik dokladi ot mezhdunarodna nauchna konferentsiia(Sofia, 2003), 155-75.Google Scholar

39. See Bell, lohn D., The Bulgarian Communist Party from Blagoev to Zhivkov(Stanford, 1985).Google Scholar

40. See Henry, Schaefer, “Zhivkov's Great Society,” Radio Free Europe Research, 23 September 1968, Open Society Archives at Central European University, Budapest Google Scholar, at www.osaarchivum.org/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/7-l-76.shtml (no longer available).

41. Komitet na dvizhenieto na bŭlgarskite, zheni, Natsionalna konferentsiia na biilgarskite zheni (23 i 24 septemvri 1968 g.)(Sofia, 1969), 224-27Google Scholar; see also TsDA, f. 417, o. 4, a.e. 3,11.1-5.

42. Jancar, Women under Communism, 107.

43. See, for instance, Ulf, Brunnbauer, “Making Bulgarians Socialist: The Fatherland Front in Communist Bulgaria, 1944-1989,” East European Politics & Societies 22, no. 1(Winter 2008): 44.Google Scholar

44. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 1,11.5-70.

45. TsDA, f. 417, o. 4, a.e. 3,11.5-12.

46. The CBWM's monthly bulletin detailed a wide array of activities organized at the municipal level, including cooking courses, book clubs, political discussions, and expert lectures on topics such as childrearing and interior design. These activities proved to be very popular with local women, who used them as a way to socialize with each other.

47. Veselina Grueva, personal communication, July 2011, Sofia, Bulgaria.

48. Anna Durcheva, personal communication, March 2013, Sofia, Bulgaria.

49. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 1,11.5-70.

50. Lagadinova knew firsthand about the problem of mixing politics with science. She had studied under Trofim Lysenko in the Soviet Union.

51. Dinkova, , “Strasti po velikata zhenska revoliutsiia,” Vensi, 2003, no. 5.Google Scholar

52. Penka, Duhtevaand Maria, Dinkova, “Zhenata v stroilelstvoto,” Zhenata dnes, 1969, no. 7: 4–8.Google Scholar

53. V. I., Lenin, “The Importance of Gold Now and After the Complete Victory of Socialism,“in Collected Works, 45vols. (Moscow, 1960-70), 33:109-16Google Scholar, at www.marxists.org/ archive/lenin/works/1921/nov/05.htm (last accessed 13 January 2014). Emphasis added.

54. See, for instance, Roumyana, Slabakova, “Research on Women in Bulgaria: The Hard Way into the Future,” in “Women's Studies in Europe,”special issue, Women's Studies Quarterly 20, nos. 3/4 (Fall-Winter, 1992): 136-43.Google Scholar

55. 1 spent an entire afternoon with Dinkova in the summer of 2011 going through twenty years’ worth of back issues of the magazine in a reading room in the National Library in Sofia. She was able to tell me exactly which articles had caused controversy and explain how the magazine had navigated around the censors.

56. “Anketna karta: Zhenata v proizvodstvoto, ocshtestveniia zhivot i semeistvoto,“ PaoEL.

57. All figures taken from the placards prepared by Elena Lagadinova for a meeting with Todor Zhivkov to discuss women's issues in 1971, PAoEL.

58. Valentina, Bodrovaand Richard, Anker, eds., Working Women in Socialist Countries: The Fertility Connection(Geneva, 1985).Google Scholar

59. Dinkova, “Strasti po velikata zhenska revoliutsiia,” Vensi, 2003, no. 5.

60. Kristen, Ghodsee, The Red Riviera: Gender, Tourism, and Postsocialism on the Black Sea(Durham, 2005), 54–56.Google Scholar

61. “Anketna karta,” PaoEL.

62. Velitchko Dobrianov et al., “Bulgaria,” in Bodrova and Anker, eds., Working Women in Socialist Countries, 66-67.

63. Gail, Kligman, The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu's Romania(Berkeley, 1998).Google Scholar

64. On the example of the Soviet Union and the early work of Zhenotdel, see Elizabeth, Wood, The Baba and the Comrade: Gender and Politics in Revolutionary Russia(Bloomington, 2000).Google Scholar

65. Inna, Leykin, “'Population Prescriptions': State, Morality, and Population Politics in Contemporary Russia”(PhD diss., Brown University, 2012).Google Scholar

66. Sergei, Zakharov, “Russian Federation: From the First to Second Demographic Transition,” Demographic Research 19, no. 24 (July 2008): 907-72.Google Scholar

67. Iliiana Marcheva, “Bŭlgarskata Leidi Stalin: Tsola Dragoicheva,” in Bŭlgarskite durzhavnitsi: 1944-1989 g. (Sofia, 2005) 117-30.

68. Bogomil, Rainov, Liudmila: Mechti i dela(Sofia, 2003).Google Scholar

69. “Za izdigane roliata na zhenata v izgrazhdaneto na razvitoto sostialistichesko obshtestvo,“ Reshenie na Politbiuro na TsK na BKP ot 6 mart 1973 g. (Sofia, 1977). For an extensive feminist analysis of this decision, see Savina Sharkova, “Sotsialisticheskata zhena mezhdu publichnoto i chastnoto (1967-1973): Vizii, protivorechiia i politicheki deistviia prez sotsializma v Bulgariia,” Godishnik na Sofiiskiia universitet “Sv. Kliment Okhridski,“ Filisoski Fakultet, Kniga Psikhologiiaa, vol. 103 (Sofia, 2012), 61-80.

70. Veselina Grueva, personal communication, July 2011, Sofia, Bulgaria

71. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 493,11.48-50.

72. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 496,11.71-73.

73. Ibid., 11.17-29.

74. Ibid., 11. 30-31.

75. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 496,1.36.

76. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 495,11.99-105.

77. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 497,11.4-6.

78. Totka Dzhondzhorova-Penkova, “Trudovata konstitutsiia i zhenata,” Biuletin na Komiteta na bŭlgarski zheni, 1986, no. 5: 8-15.

79. Veselina Grueva, personal communication, July 2011, Sofia, Bulgaria. This informant was still an open proponent of communism and believed very strongly that the ideal of communism should not be tainted by the lived experience of communism in Bulgaria in the twentieth century. As a result, she deliberately referred to the communist past as “totalitarian” to differentiate it from a potential future experiment with communism.

80. Elena Lagadinova, personal communication, July 2012, Sofia, Bulgaria.

81. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 493,11. 25-29.

82. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 496,1. 34.

83. Ibid.

84. “Razvitie na supermarketite i gipermarketite vav Frantsiia,” Nauka—teknika— ikonomika: Barza informatsia, no. 76.23.11, PAoEL

85. Iasen, Antov, “Gore glavata, bashti!,” Zhenata dries, 1983, no. 11: 14–15 Google Scholar; Stefan, Smirnov, “Muzh bez slabosti,” Zhenata dnes, 1983, no. 12:16–17.Google Scholar

86. Anna Durcheva, personal communication, July 2012, Sofia, Bulgaria.

87. Elena Lagadinova, personal communication, March 2012, Sofia, Bulgaria.

88. Tatiana, Kmetova, President of the Center for Women's Studies and Policies, personal communication, March 2012, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar

89. Planners tended to prefer concentrating resources on the production of durable and semidurable goods to the production of disposable consumer goods such as diapers and feminine hygiene products. On the logics of communist central planning see Katherine, Verdery, What was Socialism and What Comes Next(Princeton, 1996).Google Scholar

90. See, for instance, Slavenka, Drakulic, How We Survived Communism and Even Laughed(New York, 1993).Google Scholar

91. Kristen, Ghodsee, “Rethinking State Socialist Mass Women's Organizations: The Committee of the Bulgarian Women's Movement and the United Nations Decade for Women, 1975-1985,” Journal of Women's History 24, no. 4(Winter 2012): 49–73.Google Scholar

92. Maria, Dinkova, “Otpuskat po maichinstvo—praktika i problemi,”in Zhenata: Trud i bit(Sofia, 1977), 347-65.Google Scholar

93. Milanka, Vidova, Nevjana, Abadčieva, and Roumjana, Gančeva, eds., 100 Questions and Answers concerning Bulgarian Women(Sofia, 1983).Google Scholar

94. TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 492,11. 60-70; TsDA, f. 417, o. 5, a.e. 347,11.1-5.

95. TsDA, f. 417, o. 6, a.e. 306,11.1-8.

96. Yearbook of the United Nations, vol. 39 (New York, 1986), 1418.

97. Krastina Tchomakova, longtime secretary of the CBWM, personal communication, August 2011, Gabarevo, Bulgaria.

98. Iliiana Marcheva, “Maika, truzhenichka, obshtestvenichka: Elena Lagadinova— opit za tipologichen portret,” Izvestiia na Starozagorskiia istoricheski muzei, vol. 4, Sbornik ot konferentsiia “Lichnostta v istoriiata”(Stara Zagora, 2011), 444-52.

99. International Women's Tribune Center, Mid-Decade Directory, Europe: Participants at the NGO Mid-Decade Forum and World Conference of the UN Decade for Women, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 14-28,1980(New York, 1981), 7-8. Lagadinova believed this was done because Zakharieva wanted the opportunity to travel to Copenhagen.

100. “Sreshta na Drugaria Todor Zhivkov s Redkolegiata na spisanie ‘Zhenata dnes,'“ Zhenata dnes, 1982, no. 3:1.

101. Maria Dinkova, personal communication, July 2011, Sofia, Bulgaria.

102. Pencho Kobachev, “Zhenata na premiera, koiato izkliochikha ot BKP,” 24 Chasa, 22 April 2010, at www.24chasa.bg/Article.asp?ArticleId=457149 (last accessed 13 January 2014).

103. Kristen, Ghodsee, “Feminism-by-Design: Emerging Capitalisms, Cultural Feminism and Women's Nongovernmental Organizations in Post-Socialist Eastern Europe,“ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29no. 3(Spring 2004): 727-53.Google Scholar

104. Partridge, Damani J., Hypersexuality and Headscarves: Race, Sex and Citizenship in the New Germany(Bloomington, 2012), 46.Google Scholar

105. See, for instance, Thomas, Carothersand Marina, Ottoway, eds., Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion(Washington, D.C., 2000)Google Scholar; Wedel, Janine R., Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe(New York, 2001)Google Scholar; and Ghodsee, “Feminism-by-Design.“

106. Krassimira, Daskalova, “How Should We Name the ‘Women-Friendly’ Actions of State Socialism?,” Aspasia 1(2007): 214-19.Google Scholar