Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:16:40.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE VALUE OF IDEOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AMONG UNIVERSITY FACULTY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2021

Keith E. Whittington
Keith E. Whittington*
Affiliation:
Politics, Princeton University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conservatives in the United States have grown increasingly critical of universities and their faculty, convinced that professors are ideologues from the political left. Universities, for their part, have increasingly adopted a mantra of diversity and inclusivity, but have shown little interest in diversifying the political and ideological profile of their faculties. This essay argues that the lack of political diversity among American university faculty hampers the ability of universities to fulfill their core mission of advancing and disseminating knowledge. The argument is advanced through a series of four questions: Is it true that university faculty are not ideologically diverse? Why might it be true? Does it matter? How might it be fixed.

Keywords

higher educationideological diversityacademic freedomcampus free speechintellectual freedomprofessorsliberalismconservatism
Type
Research Article
Information
Social Philosophy and Policy , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , Winter 2020 , pp. 90 - 113
Copyright
© Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Immanuel Kant, “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’” in Kant: Political Writings, 2nd ed., ed. H. S. Reiss (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 54.

2 Howard, Lawrence C., “The Academic and the Ballot,” School and Society 86 (1958): 416 Google Scholar.

3 Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Wagner Thielens, Jr., The Academic Mind (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1958); Lawrence C. Howard, “The Academic and the Ballot,” School and Society 86 (1958): 415; Henry A. Turner, Charles G. McClintock, and Charles B. Spaulding, “The Political Party Affiliation of American Political Scientists,” Western Political Quarterly 16 (1963): 650; Charles G. McClintock, Charles G. Spaulding, and Henry A. Turner, “Political Orientations of Academically Affiliated Psychologists,” American Psychologist 20, no. 3 (1965): 211; David J. Armor, Joseph B. Giacquinta, R. Gordon McIntosh, and Diana E. H. Rusell, “Professors’ Attitudes toward the Vietnam War,” Public Opinion Quarterly 31 (1967): 159.

4 Seymour Martin Lipset and Everett Carll Ladd, Jr., “The Myth of the ‘Conservative’ Professor: A Reply to Michael Faia,” Sociology of Education 47 (1974): 203.

5 Eizen, Stanley and Maranell, Gary, “The Political Party Affiliation of College Professors,” Social Forces 47 (1968): 145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lipset, Seymour Martin and Ladd, Jr. Everett Carll, “The Divided Professoriate,” Change 3 (1971): 54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Everett Carll Ladd, Jr., and Seymour Martin Lipset, “Politics of Academic Natural Scientists and Engineers,” Science 176 (1972): 1091.

6 Pritchard, Keith W., Sing-Nan Fen, and Thomas H. Buxton, “The Political Leanings of College Teachers of Education in Eight Selected Universities and Colleges,” Western Political Quarterly 24 (1971): 549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lipset, Seymour Martin and Ladd, Jr. Everett Carll, “The Politics of American Sociologists,” American Journal of Sociology 78 (1972): 67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ladd, Everett Carll, Jr., and Seymour Martin Lipset, “The Politics of American Political Scientists,” Political Science and Politics 4 (1971): 135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Seymour Martin Lipset and Everett Carll Ladd, Jr., “And What Professors Think,” Psychology Today (November 1970): 50.

8 Roettger, Walter B and Winebrenner, Hugh, “The Voting Behavior of American Political Scientists: The 1980 Presidential Election,” Western Political Quarterly 36 (1983): 134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hamilton, Richard F and Hargens, Lowell L, “The Politics of the Professors: Self-Identifications, 1969–1984,” Social Forces 71 (1993): 603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 In the United States at least, partisanship and ideological commitment are often seen as bad and to be avoided, and thus many would prefer to characterize themselves as independent-minded and centrist, even when their actual behavior and commitments would align them with some distinct political or ideological camp.

10 Gross, Neil, Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Klein, Daniel B and Stern, Charlotta, “Professors and Their Politics: The Policy Views of Social Scientists,” Critical Review 17 (2005): 257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Christopher F. Cardiff and Daniel B. Klein, “Faculty Partisan Affiliations in All Disciplines: A Voter-Registration Study,” Critical Review 17 (2005): 237; Rothman, Stanley, S. Robert Lichter, and Neil Nevitte, “Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty,” The Forum 3 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zipp, John F and Fenwick, Rudy, “Is the Academy a Liberal Hegemony?: The Political Orientations and Educational Values of Professors,” Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (2006): 304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rothman, Stanley, April Kelly-Woessner, and Matthew Woessner, The Still Divided Academy (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2011)Google Scholar; Lanbert, Mitchell, Anthony J. Quain, and Daniel B. Klein, “Faculty Voter Registration in Economics, History, Journalism, Law, and Psychology,” Econ Journal Watch 13 (2016): 422 Google Scholar; Abrams, Samuel J., “Professors Moved Left Since the 1990s, Rest of the Country Did Not,” Heterodox Academy (January 9, 2016)Google Scholar; Lindgren, James, “Measuring Diversity: Law Faculties in 1997 and 2012,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 39 (2016): 89 Google Scholar; McGinnis, John O., Matthew A. Schwartz, and Benjamin Tisdell, “The Patterns and Implications of Political Contributions by Elite Law School Faculty,” Georgetown Law Journal 93 (2005): 1167 Google Scholar; Bonica, Adam, Adam S. Chilton, Kyle Rozema, and Maya Sen, “The Legal Academy’s Ideological Uniformity,” Journal of Legal Studies 47 (2018): 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Gross, Neil and Fosse, Ethan, “Why Are Professors Liberal?” Theory and Society 41 (2012): 145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Buckley, Jr. William F., Let Us Talk of Many Things (New York: Basic Books, 2008), 425 Google Scholar.

13 “Paul Wellstone,” Nation (October 31, 2002).

14 Ernest O. Melby, “Proving the Critics’ Case,” Inside Higher Ed (August 26, 2005).

15 Leslie Green, “Why It is Hard to be a Campus Conservative,” Semper Viridis (September 18, 2017).

16 Jason Rosenhouse, “Why Are So Many College Professors Politically Liberal?” ScienceBlogs (December 29, 2013).

17 Rachel Triesman and David Yaffe-Bellany, “Election 2016: Conservative Views Considered Unwelcome at Yale,” Yale Daily News (October 27, 2016).

18 Noah Carl, “Verbal Intelligence is Correlated with Socially and Economically Liberal Beliefs,” Intelligence 44 (2014): 142; Markus Kemmelmeier, “Is There a Relationship Between Political Orientation and Cognitive Ability? A Test of Three Hypotheses in Two Studies,” Personality and Individual Differences 45 (2008): 767; Edward Dutton and Richard Lynn, “Intelligence and Religious and Political Differences Among Members of the U.S. Academic Elite,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 10 (2014): 1; Gerhard Meisenberg, “Verbal Ability as a Predictor of Political Preferences in the United States, 1974–2012,” Intelligence 50 (2015): 135; Noah Carl, “Can Intelligence Explain the Overrepresentation of Liberals and Leftists in American Academia?: Intelligence 53 (2015): 181.

19 Conway, Lucian Gideon, et al., “Are Conservatives Really More Simple-Minded than Liberals? The Domain Specificity of Complex Thinking,” Political Psychology 37 (2016): 777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Lazarsfeld and Thielens, The Academic Mind, 149, 162.

21 Lipset, Seymour Martin and Dobson, Richad B, “The Intellectual as Critic and Rebel: With Special Reference to the United States and the Soviet Union,” Daedalus 101 (1972): 137 Google Scholar.

22 Adams, John, “To Thomas Pickering, September 16, 1798,” in The Works of John Adams, vol. 8, ed. Charles Francis Adams (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1853), 596 Google Scholar.

23 Wilson, Woodrow, “Leaders of Men,” in The Papers of Woodrow Wilson, vol. 6, ed. Link, Arthur S (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970), 647 Google Scholar.

24 Taylor, Stuart Jr and K. C. Johnson, Until Proven Innocent (New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2008), 399 Google Scholar.

25 Matthew Woessner and April Kelly-Woessner, “Left Pipeline: Why Conservatives Don’t Get Doctorates,” in The Politically Correct University, ed. Robert Maranto, Richard E. Redding, and Frederick M. Hess (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2009); Gross, “Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care?” 104–140; Hodgkinson, Shari P and Innes, J. Michael, “The Attitudinal Influences of Career Orientation in 1st-Year University Students: Environmental Attitudes as a Function of Degree Choice,” Journal of Environmental Education 32 (2001): 37;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Brianne, Hastie, “Cold Hearts and Bleeding Hearts: Disciplinary Differences in University Students’ Sociopolitical Orientations,” Journal of Social Psychology 147 (2007): 211 Google Scholar; Fosse, Ethan, Freese, Jeremy, and Gross, Neil, “Political Liberalism and Graduate School Attendance: A Longitudinal Analysis,” in Professors and Their Politics, ed. Neil Gross and Solon Simmons (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014)Google Scholar.

26 Porter, Stephen R and Umbach, Paul D., “College Major Choice: An Analysis of Person-Environment Fit,” Research in Higher Education 47 (2006): 429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Elchardus, Marcus and Spruyt, Bram, “The Culture of Academic Disciplines and the Sociopolitical Attitudes of Students: A Test of Selection and Socialization Effects,” Social Science Quarterly 90 (2009): 446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Binder, Amy J and Wood, Kate, Becoming Right (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Gross, “Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care?” 113.

29 Ibid., 118.

30 Woessner and Kelly-Woessner, “Left Pipeline”; Stanley Rothman, April Kelly-Woessner, and Matthew Woessner, The Still Divided Academy (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2011); Jon A. Shields and Joshua M. Dunn Sr., Passing on the Right (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016). But see Gross, “Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? 346 n. 30.

31 There is also some intriguing data suggesting that conservative academics who find themselves in disciplines that dramatically skew to the left will over time change their own political affiliation to better match that of their colleagues, though conservatives in less skewed disciplines do not. John Paul Wright, Ryan T. Motz, and Timothy S. Nixon, “Political Disparities in the Academy: It’s More Than Self-Selection,” Academic Questions 32 (2019): 402.

32 George Yancey, Compromising Scholarship (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2011); Stanley S. Rothman, Robert Lichter, and Neil Nevitte, “Politics and Professional Advancement among College Faculty,” The Forum 3 (2005); Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter, “The Vanishing Conservative—Is There a Glass Ceiling?” in The Politically Correct University, ed. Robert Maranto, Richard Redding, and Frederick Hess (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2009); James Cleith Phillips, “Political Diversity and the Legal Academy: Three Empirical Studies,” (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 2018).

33 Yoel Inbar and Joris Lammers, “Political Diversity in Social and Personality Psychology,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (2012): 496.

34 Nathan Honeycutt and Laura Freberg, “The Liberal and Conservative Experience across Academic Disciplines: An Extension of Inbar and Lammers,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 8 (2017): 115.

35 Sunstein, Cass R., “The Problem with All Those Liberal Professors,” Bloomberg Opinion (September 17, 2018)Google Scholar.

36 Glenn, David, “Senator Proposes an End to Federal Support for Political Science,” Chronicle of Higher Education (October 7, 2009)Google Scholar.

37 Ezra Klein, “Area Pundit Angry at Political Science for Proving Him Wrong,” Vox (September 17, 2014); Jonathan Chait, “Have Nerds Betrayed the Left?” New York Magazine (September 15, 2014).

38 Jeff Hauser, “The Do-Nothing Discipline,” The Baffler 38 (March 2018).

39 Buckley, Jr. William F., God and Man at Yale (Washington, DC: Regnery Press, 1951)Google Scholar.

40 D’Souza, Dinesh, Illiberal Education (New York: Free Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

41 Sykes, Charlie J., Profscam (Washington, DC: Regnery Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Kimball, Roger, Tenured Radicals (New York: Harpercollins, 1990)Google Scholar; Horowitz, David, Indoctrination U (New York: Encounter Books, 2007)Google Scholar; Shapiro, Ben, Brainwashed (Nashville, TN: Thomas West, 2010)Google Scholar; Greer, Scott, No Campus for White Men (Washington, DC: WND Books, 2017)Google Scholar.

42 Eric Owens, “Marxist Wisconsin Professor Rakes in $170,000 per year Teaching about Inequality and Oppression,” The Daily Caller (June 13, 2017).

43 See, e.g., Anya Kamenetz, “Professors Are Targets in Online Culture Wars; Some Fight Back,” NPR (April 4, 2018).

44 Wilson, John K., The Myth of Political Correctness (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

45 April Kelly-Woessner and Matthew Woessner, “My Professor Is a Partisan Hack: How Perception of a Professor’s Political Views Affect Student Course Evaluations,” Political Science and Politics 39 (2006): 495; Robert Maranto and Matthew Woessner, “Why Conservative Fears of Campus Indoctrination are Overblown,” Chronicle of Higher Education (July 31, 2017); Mack D. Mariani and Gordon J. Hewitt, “Indoctrination U? Faculty Ideology and Changes in Student Political Orientation,” Political Science and Politics 41 (2008): 773; Markus Kemmelmeier, Cherry Danielson, and Jay Basten, “What’s in a Grade? Academic Success and Political Orientation,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (2005): 1386.

46 Peter Dreier, “The Professor Watchlist Gets an F for Accuracy,” The American Prospect (December 9, 2016); Katherine Knott, “What It’s Like to Be Named to a Watch List of ‘Anti-American’ Professors,” Chronicle of Higher Education (November 23, 2016); Colleen Flaherty, “Being Watched,” Inside Higher Ed (November 22, 2016).

47 Mill, John Stuart, On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), 19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Ibid., 20.

49 Ibid., 23.

50 Ibid., 35.

51 Ibid., 19.

52 Ibid., 47–48.

53 Ibid., 47.

54 Ibid., 36.

55 It is a different problem to consider whether the campus gates should remain open to those who operate entirely outside the context of disciplinary knowledge-seeking—that is, whether universities should robustly protect campus free speech as well as academic freedom. I will bracket that issue here, though I think universities should offer protection to both. Whittington, Keith E., Speak Freely (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018)Google Scholar.

56 See also, van der Vossen, Bas, “In Defense of the Ivory Tower: Why Philosophers Should Stay Out of Politics,” Philosophical Psychology 28 (2015): 1045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Mill, On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays, 42.

58 See, e.g., Keith E. Stanovich and Maggie E. Toplak, “The Need for Intellectual Diversity in Psychological Science: Our Own Studies of Actively Open-Minded Thinking as a Case Study,” Cognition 187 (2019): 156; Jose L. Duarte, Jarret T. Crawford, Charlotta Stern, Jonathan Haidt, Lee Jussim, and Philip E. Tetlock, “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38 (2015): 1; Lee Jussim, Jarret T. Crawford, Stephanie M. Anglin, and Sean T. Stevens, “Ideological Bias in Social Psychological Research,” in Social Psychology and Politics, ed. Joseph P. Forgas, Klaus Fiedler, and William D. Crano (New York: Psychology Press, 2015); Mark Horowitz, Anthony Haynor, and Kenneth Kickham, “Sociology’s Sacred Victims and the Politics of Knowledge: Moral Foundations Theory and Disciplinary Controversies,” American Sociologist 49 (2018): 459; Chris C. Martin, “How Ideology Has Hindered Sociological Insight,” American Sociologist 47 (2016): 115.

59 Mill, On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays, 37.

60 Wolff, Robert Paul, The Ideal of the University (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969), 75 Google Scholar.

61 The UnKoch My Campus movement, however, shows how challenging even such positive projects can be. A left-leaning academia is inclined to resist efforts to foster more conservative teaching and scholarship even when such initiatives do not impinge on scholarship or teaching of existing faculty. Universities have an obligation to take care that donors of all sorts do not interfere with the autonomy of scholars on campus, but they also have an obligation not to impose ideological litmus tests on the sources or purposes of funds made available to a campus.